Factors affecting spontaneous voiding recovery after radical hysterectomy

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 685-690

  Cibula, David ^a   Sláma, Jiri ^a   Velechovská, Petra ^a   Fischerova, Daniela ^a   Zikán, Michal ^a   Pinkavová, Iva ^a   Hill, Martin ^b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Morbidity; Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy; Voiding recovery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICTURITION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINATION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77952256272     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d80ae3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, et al. Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1705-1712.
2. Pikaart DP, Holloway RW, Ahmad S, et al. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:205-210. (Pubitemid 47575729)
3. Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, et al. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:4-13.
4. Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, et al. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:154-157.
5. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomised study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3-12.
6. Jackson KS, Naik R. Pelvic floor dysfunction and radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:354-363.
7. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Type II versus type III nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:256-262.
8. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:307-314.
9. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, et al. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:180-186.
10. van den Tillart S A H M, Kenter GG, Peters A A W, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Local recurrence rate, feasibility, and safety in cervical cancer patients stage IA to IIA. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:39-45.
11. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297-303.
12. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, et al. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:287-293.
13. Wells TH, Steed H, Capstick V, et al. Suprapubic or urethral catheter: what is the optimal method of bladder drainage after radical hysterectomy? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:1034-1038.
14. Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, et al. Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1172-1178.
15. Charoenkwan K, Pranpanas S. Prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative voiding dysfunctions in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8:387-389.