Interplay of neuronal processes during response inhibition: Results from a combined event-related potentials (ERPs)/transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study on methylphenidate

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 99-106

  Hoegl, Thomas ^a   Heinrich, Hartmut ^a,b   Albrecht, Björn ^c   Diruf, Martin ^a   Moll, Gunther H ^a   Kratz, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Heckscher Klinikum   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contingent negative variation (CNV); Event related potentials (ERPs); Methylphenidate (MPH); P3; Response inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Indexed keywords

METHYLPHENIDATE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE FUNCTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHYLPHENIDATE; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960427550     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Banaschewski T., Brandeis D. Annotation: what electrical brain activity tells us about brain function that other techniques cannot tell us - a child psychiatric perspective. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2007, 48:415-435.
2. Band G.P., van Boxtel G.J. Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 1999, 101:179-211.
3. Barker A.T., Jalinous R., Freeston I.L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985, 1:1106-1107.
4. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2001-2013.
5. Beste C., Dziobek I., Hielscher H., Willemssen R., Falkenstein M. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson's disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:855-860.
6. Boroojerdi B. Pharmacologic influences on TMS effects. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 19:255-271.
7. Boylan L.S., Sackeim H.A. Magnetoelectric brain stimulation in the assessment of brain physiology and pathophysiology. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:504-512.
8. Brandeis D., van Leeuwen T.H., Rubia K., Vitacco D., Steger J., Pascual-Marqui R.D., Steinhausen H.C. Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits. Behav. Brain Res. 1998, 94:111-125.
9. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A., van Staveren A.S. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:1660-1671.
10. Buchmann J., Gierow W., Weber S., Hoeppner J., Klauer T., Benecke R., Haessler F., Wolters A. Restoration of disturbed intracortical motor inhibition and facilitation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children by methylphenidate. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62:963-969.
11. Buchmann J., Gierow W., Weber S., Hoeppner J., Klauer T., Wittstock M., Benecke R., Haessler F., Wolters A. Modulation of transcallosally mediated motor inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by medication with methylphenidate (MPH). Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 405:14-18.
12. Coons H.W., Peloquin L.J., Klorman R., Bauer L.O., Ryan R.M., Perlmutter R.A., Salzman L.F. Effect of methylphenidate on young adult's vigilance and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1981, 51:373-387.
13. Coxon J.P., Stinear C.M., Byblow W.D. Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:3371-3383.
14. Di Lazzaro V., Restuccia D., Oliviero A., Profice P., Ferrara L., Insola A., Mazzone P., Tonali P., Rothwell J.C. Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 119:265-268.
15. Dias E.C., Foxe J.J., Javitt D.C. Changing plans: a high density electrical mapping study of cortical control. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:701-715.
16. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 1999, 101:267-291.
17. Fallgatter A.J., Strik W.K. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1999, 32:233-238.
18. Filipovic S.R., Jahanshahi M., Rothwell J.C. Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision. Exp. Brain Res. 2000, 132:411-415.
19. Floeter M.K., Rothwell J.C. Releasing the brakes before pressing the gas pedal. Neurology 1999, 53:664-665.
20. Gauggel S., Rieger M., Feghoff T.A. Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson's disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004, 75:539-544.
21. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1983, 55:468-484.
22. Hoshiyama M., Kakigi R., Koyama S., Takeshima Y., Watanabe S., Shimojo M. Temporal changes of pyramidal tract activities after decision of movement: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 105:255-261.
23. Kindlon D., Mezzacappa E., Earls F. Psychometric properties of impulsivity measures: temporal stability, validity and factor structure. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1995, 36:645-661.
24. Kirschner J., Moll G.H., Fietzek U.M., Heinrich H., Mall V., Berweck S., Heinen F., Rothenberger A. Methylphenidate enhances both intracortical inhibition and facilitation in healthy adults. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003, 36:79-82.
25. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 99:19-27.
26. Kratz O., Diruf M.S., Studer P., Gierow W., Buchmann J., Moll G.H., Heinrich H. Effects of methylphenidate on motor system excitability in a response inhibition task. Behav. Brain Funct. 2009, 5:12.
27. Kujirai T., Caramia M.D., Rothwell J.C., Day B.L., Thompson P.D., Ferbert A., Wroe S., Asselman P., Marsden C.D. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 1993, 471:501-519.
28. Leocani L., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Ikoma K., Hallett M. Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 6):1161-1173.
29. Leocani L., Toro C., Zhuang P., Gerloff C., Hallett M. Event-related desynchronization in reaction time paradigms: a comparison with event-related potentials and corticospinal excitability. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:923-930.
30. McCallum W.C., Cooper R., Pocock P.V. Brain slow potential and ERP changes associated with operator load in a visual tracking task. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 69:453-468.
31. Moll G.H., Heinrich H., Rothenberger A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in child psychiatry: disturbed motor system excitability in hypermotoric syndromes. Dev. Sci. 2002, 5:381-391.
32. Moll G.H., Heinrich H., Rothenberger A. Methylphenidate and intracortical excitability: opposite effects in healthy subjects and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2003, 107:69-72.
33. Moll G.H., Heinrich H., Trott G., Wirth S., Rothenberger A. Deficient intracortical inhibition in drug-naive children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is enhanced by methylphenidate. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 284:121-125.
34. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:751-761.
35. Nigg J.T. Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127:571-598.
36. Ohlmeier M.D., Prox V., Zhang Y., Zedler M., Ziegenbein M., Emrich H.M., Dietrich D.E. Effects of methylphenidate in ADHD adults on target evaluation processing reflected by event-related potentials. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 424:149-154.
37. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
38. Overtoom C.C., Bekker E.M., van der Molen M.W., Verbaten M.N., Kooij J.J., Buitelaar J.K., Kenemans J.L. Methylphenidate restores link between stop-signal sensory impact and successful stopping in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65:614-619.
39. Penades R., Catalan R., Rubia K., Andres S., Salamero M., Gasto C. Impaired response inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder. Eur. Psychiatry 2007, 22:404-410.
40. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Weller B.J., Kopell B.S. ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 60:423-434.
41. Reis J., Swayne O.B., Vandermeeren Y., Camus M., Dimyan M.A., Harris-Love M., Perez M.A., Ragert P., Rothwell J.C., Cohen L.G. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. J. Physiol. 2008, 586:325-351.
42. Sohn Y.H., Wiltz K., Hallett M. Effect of volitional inhibition on cortical inhibitory mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 88:333-338.
43. Spronk M., Jonkman L.M., Kemner C. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:2738-2752.
44. Stinear C.M., Coxon J.P., Byblow W.D. Primary motor cortex and movement prevention: where Stop meets Go. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33:662-673.
45. van den Wildenberg W.P., Burle B., Vidal F., van der Molen M.W., Ridderinkhof K.R., Hasbroucq T. Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: a TMS study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:225-239.
46. Veniero D., Bortoletto M., Miniussi C. TMS-EEG co-registration: on TMS-induced artifact. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:1392-1399.
47. Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:418-424.
48. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
49. Willcutt E.G., DeFries J.C., Pennington B.F., Olson R.K., Smith S.D., Cardon L.R. Genetic etiology of comorbid reading difficulties and ADHD. Behavioral genetics in a postgenomic era 2003, 227-246. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C. R. Plomin, J.C. DeFries, P. McGuffin, I. Craig (Eds.).
50. Wylie S.A., van den Wildenberg W.P., Ridderinkhof K.R., Bashore T.R., Powell V.D., Manning C.A., Wooten G.F. The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1844-1853.