Risk factors for advanced adenomas amongst small and diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective monocenter study

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 609-612

  Chaput, Ulriikka ^a   Alberto, Sara Folgado ^a   Terris, Benoit ^a   Beuvon, Frederic ^a   Audureau, Etienne ^a   Coriat, Romain ^a   Roche, Herve ^a   Gaudric, Marianne ^a   Prat, Frederic ^a   Chaussade, Stanislas ^a  

^a CHU Cochin Port Royal ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Advanced adenoma; Diminutive polyps; Small polyps; Villous

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM POLYP; RISK FACTOR; TUMOR VOLUME; VILLOUS ADENOMA;

ADENOMA; AGED; CARCINOMA; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 79960380581     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: 18783562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Muto T., Bussey H.J., Morson B.C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975, 36:2251-2270.
2. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002, 12:1-9. v.
3. Halligan S., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005, 237:893-904.
4. Kim D.H., et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1403-1412.
5. Mulhall B.P., Veerappan G.R., Jackson J.L. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005, 142:635-650.
6. Pickhardt P.J., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
7. van Dam J., et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:970-984.
8. Zalis M.E., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.
9. Rex D.K. PRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:p1903-p1905. discussion 1907-8.
10. Rex D.K., et al. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:149-153.
11. Hofstad B., et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996, 39:449-456.
12. Gschwantler M., et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002, 14:183-188.
13. Lieberman D., et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1100-1105.
14. Atkin W.S., Morson B.C., Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:658-662.
15. O'Brien M.J., et al. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990, 98:371-379. The National Polyp Study.
16. Winawer S.J., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:1872-1885.
17. Yang G., et al. Pathologic features of initial adenomas as predictors for metachronous adenomas of the rectum. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:1661-1665.
18. Nusko G., et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 1997, 29:626-631.
19. Unal H., et al. Malignancy risk of small polyps and related factors. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:2796-2799.
20. Martinez M.E., et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:832-841.
21. Appelman H.D. Con: High-grade dysplasia and villous features should not be part of the routine diagnosis of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:1329-1331.
22. Rex D.K., Goldblum J.R. Pro: Villous elements and high-grade dysplasia help guide post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:1327-1329.
23. Odze R.D. " Should High Grade Dysplasia or Degree of Villous Change in Colonic Polyps be Reported?" Previously reported in American Journal of Gastroenterology, Reply to Dr. Villanacci. Am J Gastroenterol 2008.
24. Lieberman D.A., et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:1077-1085.
25. Loeve F., et al. Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study. Int J Cancer 2004, 111:147-151.