European infrastructure networks and regional innovation in science-based technologies

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 517-537

  Vinciguerra, Sandra ^a,b   Frenken, Koen ^a,c   Hoekman, Jarno ^a,c   van Oort, Frank ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Global cities; Infrastructure networks; Knowledge spillovers; NUTS3; World cities

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960378641     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2011.562358     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acs, Z. 2002. Innovation and the growth of cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2. Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28, no. 1: 31-56.
3. Boschma, R.A. 2005. Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39, no. 1: 61-74.
4. Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri. 2003. Innovation and spillovers in region: Evidence form European patentdata. European Economic Review 47, no. 4: 687-710.
5. Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2001. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change 10, no. 4: 975-1005.
6. Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography 9, no. 4: 439-68.
7. Burger, M.J., F.G. van Oort, and G.J.M. Linders. 2009. On the specification of the gravity model of trade: Zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis 4, no. 2: 167-90.
8. Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Cooke, P., M.G. Uranga, and G. Extebarria. 1998. Regional innovation systems: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A 30, no. 9: 1563-84.
10. Cowan, R., P.A. David, and D. Foray. 2000. The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, no. 2: 211-53.
11. Derudder, B. 2006. On conceptual confusion in empirical analysis of a transnational urban network. Urban Studies 43, no. 11: 2027-46.
12. Fingleton, B. 2003. Externalities, economic geography and spatial econometrics: Conceptual and modeling developments. International Regional Science Review 26, no. 2: 197-207.
13. Friedmann, J. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17, no. 1: 69-83.
14. Fritsch, M., and V. Slavtchev. 2007. Universities and innovation in space. Industry and Innovation 14, no. 2: 201-18.
15. Giuri, P., S. Brusoni, G. Crespi, D. Francoz, A. Gambardella, W. Garcia-Fontes, A. Geuna, et al. 2007. Inventors and invention processes in Europe. Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy 36, no. 8: 1107-27.
16. Glaeser, E.L., H.D. Kallal, J.A. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100, no. 6: 1126-52.
17. Greunz, L. 2003. Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions. Annals of Regional Science 37, no. 4: 657-80.
18. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28, no. 4: 1661-707.
19. Jaffe, A.B. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79, no. 5: 957-70.
20. Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3: 577-98.
21. Leenders, R.T.A.J. 2002. Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24, no. 1: 21-47.
22. Maggioni, M.A., M. Nosvelli, and T.E. Uberti. 2007. Space vs. networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science 86, no. 3: 471-93.
23. Maurseth, P.B., and B. Verspagen. 2002. Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104, no. 4: 531-45.
24. Moreno, R., R. Paci, and S. Usai. 2005. Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions. Environment and Planning A 37, no. 10: 1793-812.
25. Peri, G. 2005. Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 87, no. 2: 308-22.
26. Ponds, R., F. van Oort, and K. Frenken. 2007. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science 86, no. 3: 423-43.
27. Ponds, R., F. van Oort, and K. Frenken. 2010. Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography 10, no. 2: 231-55.
28. Rallet, A. 1993. Choix de proximité et processus d'innovation technologique. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine, numéro special Economie de Proximités 3, no. 1: 365-86.
29. Rallet, A., and A. Torre. 1999. Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? Geojournal 49, no. 4: 373-80.
30. Rutherford, J., A. Gillespie, and R. Richardson. 2004. The territoriality of pan-European telecommunications backbone networks. Journal of Urban Technology 11, no. 3: 1-34.
31. Sassen, S. 1991. The global city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Van Looy, B., E. Zimmerman, R. Veugelers, E. Verbeek, J. Mello, and K. Debackere. 2003. Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? Scientometrics 57, no. 3: 355-67.
33. Verbeek, A., J. Callaert, P., Andries, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and R. Veugelers. 2002. Linking science to technology-bibliographic references in patents: Volume 1, science and technology interplaypolicy relevant findings and interpretation. Report to the European Commission DG Research Project ERNHPV2-CT-1993-03 CBSTII action Brussels EUR 20492/1, Leuven, Belgium.