Evaluation of water use for bioenergy at different scales

Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 361-374

  Yeh, Sonia ^a   Berndes, Göran ^b   Mishra, Gouri S ^a   Wani, Suhas P ^c   Elia Neto, André ^d   Suh, Sangwon ^e   Karlberg, Louise ^f   Heinke, Jens ^g   Garg, Kaushal K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^d CTC Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^g POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Biofuels; Life cycle analysis; Sustainability; Water footprint; Water use indicators

Indexed keywords

BIO-ENERGY; BIOENERGY PRODUCTS; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CO-PRODUCTS; CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; CROP MANAGEMENTS; DIFFERENT SCALE; DIRECT MEASUREMENT; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; END-USERS; GLOBAL SCALE; GREEN WATER; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION; SOIL QUALITY; SPATIAL SCALE; WATER DEMAND; WATER FOOTPRINT; WATER PRODUCTIVITY; WATER REQUIREMENTS; WATER USE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; WATER USE INDICATORS; WATERRESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOFUELS; CROPS; ECOSYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; PLANNING; PRODUCTIVITY; SUPPLY CHAINS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

WATER CONSERVATION;

EID: 79960371255     PISSN: 1932104X     EISSN: 19321031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.308     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Berndes G, Bioenergy and water-the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Global Environ Chang 12:253-271 (2002).
2. Berndes G, Water Demand for Global Bioenergy Production: Trends, Risks and Opportunities. WBGU, Göteborg, Berlin (2008).
3. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY and van der Meer TH, The water footprint of bioenergy. P Natl Acad Sci 106:10219-10223 (2008).
4. Bonnet J-F and Lorne D, Water and Biofuels in 2030: Water Impacts of French Biofuel Development at the 2030 Time Horizon. Les cahiers du CLIP (19):98 (2009). Available at: [June 13, 2011].
5. National Research Council, Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2007).
6. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM and Mekonnen MM, Water Footprint Manual. Water Footprint Network, Enschede, the Netherlands (2009).
7. Hoff H et al., Greening the global water system. J Hydrol 384:177-186 (2010).
8. Rockstrom J et al., Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour Res 45 (4), (2009). W00A12, 16 pp. DOI:10.1029/2007WR006767.
9. Rockström J et al., Managing water in rain-fed agriculture: The need for a paradigm shift. Agr Water Manage 97:543-550(2010).
10. Burt CM et al., Irrigation performance measures: Efficiency and uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng 123:423-442 (1997).
11. Rockström J, Gordon L, Folke C, Falkenmark M and Engwall M, Linkages among water vapor flows, food production, and terrestrial ecosystem services. Conserv Ecol 3 (2):5 (1999).
12. King CW and Webber ME, Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol 42 (21):7866-7872 (2008), DOI:10.1021/es800367m
13. Chiu Y-W, Walseth B and Suh S, Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 43 (8): 2688-2692 (2009), DOI: 10.1021/es8031067.
14. Pfister S, Koehler A and Hellweg S, Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43 (11), pp 4098-4104 (2009).
15. Fingerman K, Torn M, O'Hare M and Kammen D, Accounting for the water impacts of ethanol production. Environ Res Lett 5:014020 (2010).
16. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY and van der Meer TH, Water Footprint of Bio-Energy and other Primary Energy Carriers. UNESCO-IHE Institute of Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands (2008).
17. Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY and van der Meer TH, The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10219-10223 (2009).
18. Mubako S and Lant C, Water resource requirements of corn-based ethanol. Water Resour Res 44:W00A02 (2008).
19. Wu M, Mintz M, Wang M and Arora S, Water consumption in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. Environ Manage 44:981-997 (2009).
20. Rosegrant MW, Cai X and Cline S, World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington DC (2002).
21. Perry C, Steduto P, Allen RG and Burt CM, Increasing productivity in irrigated agriculture: Agronomic constraints and hydrological realities. Agr Water Manage 96:1517-1524 (2009).
22. Shah TJ and Burke KV, Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, ed by Molden D. International Water Management Institute, Colombo (Earthscan, London) (2007).
23. Fargione JE, Plevin RJ and Hill JD, The Ecological Impact of Biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:351-377 (2010).
24. Mishra G and Yeh S, Life-cycle water consumption and withdrawal requirements of ethanol from corn grain and residues Environ Sci Technol, re-submitted March, 2011. 45 (10), pp 4563-4569. (2011) DOI: 10.1021/es104145m.
25. Ridoutt BG and Pfister S, A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environ Chang 20:113-120 (2010).
26. Milà i Canals L et al., Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I - inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14:28-42 (2009).
27. Scanlon BR, Jolly I, Sophocleous M and Zhang AL, Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: Quantity versus quality. World Resour Res 43 (2007). W03437, DOI:10.1029/2006WR005486.
28. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, van Straaten O and Bossio DA, Carbon, Land and Water: A Global Analysis of the Hydrologic Dimensions of Climate Change Mitigation through Afforestation / Reforestation, IWMI Research Report 101. International Water Management Institute, Colombo (2006).
29. Jackson RB et al., Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 310:1944-1947 (2005).
30. Malmer A, Murdiyarso D, Bruijnzeel LA., and Ilstedt U, Carbon sequestration in tropical forests and water: a critical look at the basis for commonly used generalizations. Global Chang Biol 16 (2), pp 599-604 (2010).
31. Hoekstra AY, Gerbens-Leenes W and van der Meer TH, Reply to Pfister and Hellweg: Water footprint accounting, impact assessment, and life-cycle assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:E114 (2009).
32. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY and van der Meer T, The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 68:1052-1060 (2009).
33. Chapagain AK and Orr S, An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: A case of Spanish tomatoes. J Environ Manage 90:1219-1228 (2009).
34. Chapagain AK, Globalisation of Water: Opportunities and Threats of Virtual Water Trade. Taylor and Francis (2006). Available at.
35. Berndes G, Karlberg L, Heinke J and Hamelinck C, Global water use for bioenergy production: policy impacts and options for water savings. Interim Report, Division of Physical Resource Theory, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden (2011).
36. Elia Neto A and Shintaku A, Manual de Conservação e Reúso de Água na Agroindústria Sucroenergética (Manual for Conservation and Water Reuse in Sugar-Ethanol Sugarcane Mills), ed by Elia Neto A et al. ANA, FIESP, UNICA and CTC (2010).
37. Garg K, Karlberg L, Wani SP and Berndes G, Biofuel production on wastelands in India: opportunities and tradeoffs for soil and water management at the watershed scale. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 5:410-430 (2011).
38. Elia Neto A, Zotelli LC and Donzelli JL, Cenários de Demanda de Água Industrial para o Setor Sucroenergético nas Bacias Hidrográficas do Estado de São Paulo (Scenarios of Industrial Water to Sugar-Ethanol Sugarcane Mills in São Paulo State Watershed). Anais do II Congresso Estadual de Comitês de Bacia, São Pedo, SP (2010).
39. Wani SP, Osman M, Emmanuel DS and Sreedevi TK, Improved livelihoods and environmental protection through biodiesel plantations in Asia. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 8:11-29 (2006).
40. Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP and Gowda CLL, Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L: A review. Appl Energ 87:732-742 (2010).
41. Achten WMJ et al., Jatropha: From global hype to local opportunity. J Arid Environ 74:164-165 (2010).
42. Wani SP, Sreedevi TK, Marimuthu S, Kesava Rao A VR and Vineela C, Harnessing the potential of Jatropha and Pongamia plantations for improving livelihoods and rehabilitating degraded lands, in 6th International Biofuels Conference. March 4-5, New Delhi, India (2009).
43. Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET), Computer Model v. August 26, 2010. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL (2010).
44. Wang M, Huo H and Arora S, Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context. Energ Pol in press (2011), DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.052.
45. Griffiths M, Taylor A and Woynillowicz D, Troubled Waters, Troubling Trends. The Pembina Institute (2006). Alberta, Canada. Available at.
46. Davidson D and Hurley AM, Running out of Steam? Oil Sands Development and Water Use in the Athabasca River-Watershed: Science and Market based Solutions. University of Alberta and University of Toronto (2007). Alberta, Canada. avaiable.
47. Kelly EN et al. Oil sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:16178-16183 (2010).
48. GAO. Energy-Water Nexus: A Better and Coordinated Understanding of Water Resources Could Help Mitigate the Impacts of Potential Oil Shale Development; GAO-11-35. 70 United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), Washington, DC (2010).
49. Rockström J et al., Managing water in rain-fed agriculture-The need for a paradigm shift. Agr Water Manage 97:543-550 (2010).
50. Lal R, Offsetting global CO2 emissions by restoration of degraded soils and intensification of world agriculture and forestry. Land Degrad Dev 14:309-322 (2003).
51. Rost S et al., Global potential to increase crop production through water management in rain-fed agriculture. Environ Res Lett 4:044002 (2009).
52. Sulser T et al., Green and blue water accounting in the Ganges and Nile basins: Implications for food and agricultural policy. J Hydrol 384:276-291 (2010).
53. Herrero M et al., Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems Science 327:822 (2010).
54. Ridoutt BG and Pfister S, A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environ Chang 20:113-120 (2010).
55. Bayart J-B et al., A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15:439-453 (2010).
56. Guinee J et al., Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004). Avaliable at: Dordrecht.
57. Alcamo J et al., Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol Sci J 48:317-337 (2003).
58. McIsaac GF, David MB and Corey A, Miscanthus and Switchgrass Production in Central Illinois: Impacts on Hydrology and Inorganic Nitrogen Leaching. J Environ Qual 39:1790-1799 (2010).
59. Dominguez-Faus R, Powers SE, Burken JG and Alvarez PJ, The water footprint of biofuels: A drink or drive issue? Environ Sci Technol 43:3005-3010 (2009).