Thought experiments in the theology of revelation? An initial approach;Gedankenexperimente in der offenbarungstheologie? Eine erste annäherung

Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 109-129

  Fehige, Yiftach J H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Augustine; Intuition; Revelation; Theology; Thought experiment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960364944     PISSN: 00121045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. J. Peijnenburg u. D. Atkinson, When are Thought Experiments Poor Ones?, in: Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 34 (2003), 305-322, hier: 318.
2. N. Kujundzic, The Role of Variation in Thought Experiments, in: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12 (1998), 239-243.
3. R. A. Sorensen, Thought Experiments, Oxford 1992, 200-202.
4. J. R. Brown, Why Empiricism Won't Work, in: Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2 (1992), 271-279, besonders 274-275;
5. D. Davies, Thought Experiments and Fictional Narratives, in: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, VII (2007), 29-45;
6. N. Nersessian, Thought Experiments as Mental Modelling: Empiricism without Logic, in: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, VII (2007), 125-161, besonders 144-153;
7. P. Swirski, Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution and Game Theory, London 2007.
8. T. De Mey, Imagination's Grip on Science, in: Metaphilosophy, 37 (2006), 222-239.
9. A. Bokulich, Rethinking Thought Experiments, in: Perspectives on Science, 9 (2001), 285-307.
10. S. Krimsky, The Use and Misuse of Critical Gedankenexperimente, in: Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 4 (1973), 323-334, hier: 331.
11. E. Brendel, Wahrheit und Wissen, Paderborn 1999, 9-14.
12. J. R. Brown, Why Thought Experiments Do Transcend Empiricism, in: Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, hg. v. C. Hitchcock, Malden/Mass. 2004, 23-43, hier: 25
13. S. Haggqvist, A Model for Thought Experiments, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39 (2009), 56-76, hier: 58:
14. 91950, 58-59.
15. 61991, besonders 83-91.
16. D. E. Klemm u. W. H. Klink, Dialogue on Theological Models: Constructing and Testing Theological Models, in: Zygon, 38 (2003), 495-527, hier: 495.
17. J. G. Lennox, Darwinian Thought Experiments: A Function for Just-So Stories, in: Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, hg. v. T. Horowitz u. G. Massey, Lanham 1991, 223-245;
18. J. Reiss, Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments and Singular Causal Inference in History, in: Philosophy of Science, 76 (2009), 712-723;
19. N. Rescher, Imagining Irreality, Chicago 2003, 229-238;
20. Unmaking the West: What-If? Scenarios That Rewrite World History, hg. v. Ph. E. Tetlock u. a., Ann Arbor 2009, besonders 14-44;
21. E. Weber u. T. DeMey, Explanation and Thought Experiments in History, in: History and Theory, 42 (2003), 28-38;
22. J. R. Brown, The Laboratory of the Mind, Second Revised Edition, New York 2010, 67-97;
23. E. Glas, Thought Experimentation and Mathematical Innovation, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30 (1999), 1-19;
24. J. P. Van Bendegem, Thought Experiments in Mathematics: Anything But Proof, in: Philosophica, 72 (2003), 9-33;
25. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics, hg. v. Ph. E. Tetlock u. a., Princeton 1996, besonders 1-67.
26. R. Cooper, Thought Experiments, in: Metaphilosophy, 36 (2005), 328-347, besonders 329-330;
27. U. Gähde, Gedankenexperimente in Erkenntnistheorie und Physik: strukturelle Parallelen, in: J. Nida-Rümelin, Rationalität, Realismus, Revision, Berlin 2000, 457-464.
28. R. J. Snooks, Another Scientific Practice Separating Chemistry from Physics, in: Foundations of Chemistry, 8 (2006), 255-270.
29. J. Habermas, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, Frankfurt/M. 2005, 119-154 u. 216-257;
30. 22005, besonders 83-136; 159-196.
31. I. Barbour, Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues, New York 1990, 77-105.
32. G. Cantor u. C. Kenny, Barbour's Fourfold Way: Problems with His Taxonomy of Science-Religion Relationships, in: Zygon, 36 (2001), 765-781.
33. J. Polkinghorne, Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship, New Heaven 2007.
34. J. Polkinghorne, The Faith of a Physicist, Minneapolis 1996, 193-194
35. D. E. Klemm u. W. H. Klink, Dialogue on Theological Models: Constructing and Testing Theological Models, a. a. O., 495-527,
36. J. L. Schellenberg, Philosophy of Religion: A State of the Subject Report, in: Toronto Journal of Theology, 25 (2009), 95-110;
37. J. Hick, God and Christianity according to Swinburne, in: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2 (2010), 25-37, hier: 26.
38. J. McAllister, The Evidential Significance of Thought Experiments in Science, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27 (1996), 233-250.
39. C. M. N. Eire, The Quest for a Counterfactual Jesus, in: Unmaking the West, hg. v. Ph. E. Tetlock u. a., Ann Harbor 2006, 119-142, hier: 131.
40. E. Brendel, Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments, in: Dialectica, 58 (2004), 88-108;
41. T. S. Gendler, Philosophical Thought Experiments, Intuitions, and Cognitive Equilibrium, in: Midwest Studies in Philosophy of Science, 31 (2007), 68-89.
42. D. G. Myers, Intuition. Its powers and perils, New Haven 2004.
43. G. Bealer, George, Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy, in: Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition & Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, hg. v. M. DePaul u. W. Ramsey, Lanham 1998, 201-239, hier: 207-214.
44. G. Gigerenzer, I think, therefore I err, in: Social Research, 72 (2005), 195-218.
45. dies., Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment, Oxford 2005.
46. Sh. Krimsky, The use and misuse of critical Gedankenexperimente, in: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 4 (1973), 323-334, hier: 331
47. J. D. Norton, Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26 (1996), 333-366, hier: 339.
48. Th. Wilson, Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconsciousness, Cambridge/Mass. 2002, besonders 1-41.
49. ders., Medien der Vernunft, Frankfurt/M. 2001.
50. W. Heisenberg, Die Richtigkeitskriterien der abgeschlossenen Theorien in der Physik, in: Einheit und Vielheit, hg. v. E. Scheibe u. G. Sussmann, Göttingen 1973, 140-144.
51. ders., The Logic of Thought Experiments, in: Synthese, 106 (1996), 227-240.
52. ders., Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism, in: Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, hg. v. C. Hitchcock, Oxford 2004, 44-66.
53. L. Barsalou, Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364 (2009), 1281-1289, hier: 1282.
54. Ling-Ling Wu u. L. Barsalou, Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation, in: Acta Psychologica, 132 (2009), 173-189.
55. L. Barsalou, Embodiment in Religious Knowledge, in: Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5 (2005), 14-57;
56. ders., Multimodal Simulation in Conceptual Processing, in: Categorization inside and outside the lab, hg. v. W. Ahn u. a., Washington 2005, 249-270;
57. 52002, 211
58. N. Bohr, Diskussion mit Einstein über erkenntnistheoretische Probleme in der Atomphysik, in: Albert Einstein als Philosoph und Naturforscher, hg. v. P. A. Schilpp, Stuttgart 1949, 115-150.
59. A. C. de la Torre, The photon-box Bohr-Einstein demythologized, in: European Journal of Physics, 21 (2000), 253-260;
60. V. Hinizdo, On Bohr's response to the clock-in-the-box thought experiment of Einstein, in: European Journal of Physics, 23 (2002), L 9-L13.
61. U. Kühne, Die Methode des Gedankenexperiments, Frankfurt/M. 2005, 303.
62. J. Hilgevoord, The uncertainty principle for energy and time II, in: American Journal of Physics, 66 (1997), 396-402.
63. S. Bosbach u. a., Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation, in: Nature Neuroscience, 8 (2005), 1295-1297.
64. M. A. Bishop, Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments, in: Philosophy of Science, 66 (1999), 534-541.
65. P. Eicher, Offenbarung. Prinzip neuzeitlicher Tradition, München 1977, 48-57.
66. 22007, besonders 79-108.
67. E. Schillebeeckx, The Understanding of Faith, New York 1972, 36
68. W. Groß, Ist biblisch-theologische Auslegung ein integrierender Methodenschritt?, in: Wie viel Systematik erlaubt die Schrift? Auf der Suche nach einer gesamtbiblischen Theologie, hg. v. F.-L. Hossfeld, (Quaestiones Disputatae, Bd. 185), Freiburg 2001, 110-149.
69. T. Fuhrer, Der Geist im vollkommenen Körper: Ein Gedankenexperiment in Augustins De civitate 22, in: Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, hg. v. D. Frede u. B. Reis, Berlin 2007, 465-491.
70. R. P. Russell, Saint Augustine: The Teacher, The Free Choice of the Will, Grace and Free Will, (The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation, Bd. 39), Washington 1968, 66.
71. S. Blackburn, Lust, New York 2004.
72. U. Ranke-Heinemann, Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven, New York 1990, 75-90;
73. J. H. Y. Fehige, Sexualphilosophie: Eine einführende Annäherung, Münster 2007, 87-89.
74. D. Perler, Thought Experiments: The Methodological Functions of Angels in Late Medieval Epistemology, in: Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry: Their Function and Significance, hg. v. I. Iribarren u. M. Lenz, Hampshire 2008, 143-153.
75. G. Meilaender, Sweet Necessities: Food, Sex, and Saint Augustine, in: Journal of Religious Ethics, 29 (2001), 3-18.
76. Y. J. H. Fehige, Transsexuality: Reconciling Christianity and Science, in: Toronto Journal of Theology, 27 (im Erscheinen).