An immunological approach to quantify consumption of protein-tagged Lygus hesperus by the entire cotton predator assemblage

Biological Control

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 337-345

  Hagler, James R ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; ELISA; Immunomarking; Predator gut content analysis; Protein marking; Western tarnished plant bug

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; ARTHROPODA; COLEOPTERA; GLYCINE MAX; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HETEROPTERA; LYGUS HESPERUS; LYGUS LINEOLARIS; MIRIDAE; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 79960346730     PISSN: 10499644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agusti N., De Vicente M.C., Gabarra R. Development of sequence amplified characterized region (SCAR) markers of Helicoverpa armigera: a new polymerase chain reaction-based technique for predator gut analysis. Molecular Ecology 1999, 8:1467-1474.
2. Blackmer J.L., Hagler J.R., Simmons G.S., Canas L.A. Comparative dispersal of Homalodisca coagulata and Homalodisca liturata (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Environmental Entomology 2004, 33:88-99.
3. Boina D.R., Meyer W.L., Onagbola E.O., Stelinski L.L. Quantifying dispersal of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) by immunomarking and potential impact of unmanaged groves on commercial citrus management. Environmental Entomology 2009, 38:1250-1258.
4. Buczkowski G., Bennett G. Dispersal central-place foraging in the polydomous odorous house ant, Tapinoma sessile as revealed by a protein marker. Insectes Sociaux 2006, 53:282-290.
5. Buczkowski G., Bennett G. Protein marking reveals predation of termites by the woodland ant, Aphaenogaster rudis. Insectes Sociaux 2007, 54:219-224.
6. Butler G.D. Spanogonicus albofasciatus as an insect and mite predator. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 1965, 38:70-75.
7. Calder C.R., Harwood J.D., Symondson W.O.C. Detection of scavenged material in the guts of predators using monoclonal antibodies: a significant source of error in measurement of predation?. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2005, 95:57-62.
8. Chapman E.G., Romero S.A., Harwood J.D. Maximizing collection and minimizing risk: does vacuum suction sampling increase the likelihood for misinterpretation of food web connections?. Molecular Ecology Resources 2010, 10:1023-1033.
9. Chen Y., Giles K.L., Payton M.E., Greenstone M.H. Identifying key cereal aphid predators by molecular gut analysis. Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:1887-1898.
10. Clancy D.W., Pierce H.D. Natural enemies of some Lygus bugs. Journal of Economic Entomology 1966, 59:853-858.
11. Cohen A.C. Extra-oral digestion in predaceous terrestrial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 1995, 40:85-103.
12. Debolt J.W. Meridic diet for rearing successive generations of Lygus hesperus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1982, 75:119-122.
13. Dunbar D.M., Bacon O.G. Feeding, development, and reproduction of Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) on eight diets. Annals Entomological Society of America 1972, 65:892-895.
14. Falcon L.A., van den Bosch R., Ferris C.A., Stromberg L.K., Etzel K., Stinner R.E. A comparison of season-long cotton-pest-control programs in California during 1966. Journal of Economic Entomology 1968, 61:633-642.
15. Foltan P., Sheppard S., Konvicka M., Symondson W.O.C. The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4147-4158.
16. Fournier V., Hagler J., Daane K., de León J., Groves R. Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay. Oecologia 2008, 157:629-640.
17. Fournier V., Hagler J.R., Daane K., de León J., Groves R., Costa H., Henneberry T.J. Development and application of a glassy-winged and smoke-tree sharpshooter egg-specific predator gut content ELISA. Biological Control 2006, 37:108-118.
18. Greenstone M.H. Serological analysis of arthropod predation: past, present and future. The Ecology of Agricultural Pests: Biochemical Approaches 1996, 265-300. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY. W.O.C. Symondson, J.E. Liddell (Eds.).
19. Greenstone M.H., Rowley D.L., Weber D.C., Payton M.E., Hawthorne D.J. Feeding mode and prey detectability half-lives in molecular gut-content analysis: an example with two predators of the Colorado potato beetle. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2007, 97:201-209.
20. Greenstone M.H., Shufran K.A. Spider predation: species-specific identification of gut contents by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Arachnology 2003, 31:131-134.
21. Greenstone M.H., Szendrei Z., Payton M.E., Rowley D.L., Coudron T.A., Weber D.C. Choosing natural enemies for conservation biological control: use of the prey detectability half-life to rank key predators of Colorado potato beetle. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata 2010, 136:97-107.
22. Hagler J.R. Field retention of a novel mark-release-recapture method. Environmental Entomology 1997, 26:1079-1086.
23. Hagler J.R. Variation in the efficacy of several predator gut content immunoassays. Biological Control 1998, 12:25-32.
24. Hagler J.R. Development of an immunological technique for identifying multiple predator-prey interactions in a complex arthropod assemblage. Annals of Applied Biology 2006, 149:153-165.
25. Hagler J.R., Baker P.B., Marchosky R., Machtley S.A., Bellamy D.E. Methods to mark termites with protein for mark-release-recapture and mark-capture type studies. Insectes Sociaux 2009, 56:213-220.
26. Hagler J.R., Cohen A.C. Effects of time and temperature on digestion of purified antigen by Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) reared on artificial diet. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1990, 83:1177-1180.
27. Hagler J.R., Cohen A.C., Bradley-Dunlop D., Enriquez F.J. Field evaluation of predation on Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) using a species- and stage-specific monoclonal antibody. Environmental Entomology 1992, 21:896-900.
28. Hagler J.R., Cohen A.C., Bradley-Dunlop D., Enriquez F.J. New approach to mark insects for feeding and dispersal studies. Environmental Entomology 1992, 21:20-25.
29. Hagler J.R., Durand C.M. A new method for immunologically marking prey and its use in predation studies. Entomophaga 1994, 39:257-265.
30. Hagler J.R., Jackson C.G. An immunomarking technique for labeling minute parasitoids. Environmental Entomology 1998, 27:1010-1016.
31. Hagler J.R., Jones V.P. An approach to mark arthropods for mark-capture research. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata 2010, 135:177-192.
32. Hagler J.R., Miller E. An alternative to conventional insect marking procedures: detection of a protein mark on pink bollworm by ELISA. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2002, 103:1-9.
33. Hagler J.R., Naranjo S.E. Determining the frequency of heteropteran predation on sweetpotato shitefly and pink bollworm using multiple ELISAs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1994, 72:59-66.
34. Hagler J.R., Naranjo S.E. Using gut content immunoassays to evaluate predaceous biological control agents: a case study. The Ecology of Agricultural Pests: Biochemical Approaches 1996, 383-399. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY. W.O.C. Symondson, J.E. Liddell (Eds.).
35. Hagler J.R., Naranjo S.E. Measuring the sensitivity of an indirect predator gut content ELISA: detectability of prey remains in relation to predator species, temperature, time, and meal size. Biological Control 1997, 9:112-119.
36. Hagler J.R., Naranjo S.E. Use of a gut content ELISA to detect whitefly predator feeding activity after field exposure to different insecticide treatments. Biocontrol Science and Technology 2005, 15:321-339.
37. Hagler J.R., Naranjo S.E., Erickson M.L., Machtley S.A., Wright S.F. Immunological examinations of species variability in predator gut content assays: effect of predator:prey protein ratio on immunoassay sensitivity. Biological Control 1997, 9:120-129.
38. Harper G.L., King R.A., Dodd C.S., Harwood J.D., Glen D.M., Bruford M.W., Symondson W.O.C. Rapid screening of invertebrate predators for multiple prey DNA targets. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:819-827.
39. Harwood J.D. Are sweep net sampling and pitfall trapping compatible with molecular analysis of predation?. Environmental Entomology 2008, 37:990-995.
40. Harwood J.D., Desneux N., Yoo H.J.S., Rowley D.L., Greenstone M.H., Obrycki J.J., O'Neil R.J. Tracking the role of alternative prey in soybean aphid predation by Orius insidiosus: a molecular approach. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:4390-4400.
41. Harwood J.D., Phillips S.W., Sunderland K.D., Symondson W.O.C. Secondary predation: quantification of food chain errors in an aphid-spider-carabid system using monoclonal antibodies. Molecular Ecology 2001, 10:2049-2057.
42. Harwood J.D., Sunderland K.D., Symondson W.O.C. Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:3549-3560.
43. Janke J., Bandte M., Ulrichs C., Grabenweger G., Jackel B., Balder H., Buttner C. Serological marking of Pnigalio agraules (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) for field dispersal studies. Journal of Pest Science 2009, 82:47-53.
44. Jasrotia P., Ben-Yakir D. An immuno-marking technique for thrips. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2006, 120:155-160.
45. Jones V.P., Hagler J.R., Brunner J.F., Baker C.C., Wilburn T.D. An inexpensive immunomarking technique for studying movement patterns of naturally occurring insect populations. Environmental Entomology 2006, 35:827-836.
46. Juen A., Traugott M. Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: a case study using a soil insect predator-prey system. Oecologia 2005, 142:344-352.
47. Kasper M.L., Reeson A.F., Cooper J.B., Perry K.D., Austin A.D. Assessment of prey overlap between a native (Polistes humilis) and an introduced (Vespula germanica) social wasp using morphology and phylogenetic analyses of 16S rDNA. Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:2037-2048.
48. Leigh T.F., Gonzalez D. Field cage evaluation of predators for control of Lygus hesperus Knight on cotton. Environmental Entomology 1976, 5:948-952.
49. Luck R.F., Shepard B.M., Kenmore P.E. Experimental methods for evaluating arthropod natural enemies. Annual Review of Entomology 1988, 33:367-391.
50. Mansfield S., Hagler J.R., Whitehouse M.E.A. A comparative study on the efficacy of a pest-specific and prey-marking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of predation. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2008, 127:199-206.
51. McCarty M.T., Shepard M., Turnipseed S.G. Identification of predaceous arthropods in soybeans by using autoradiography. Environmental Entomology 1980, 9:199-203.
52. Murray R.A., Solomon M.G. A rapid technique for analyzing diets of invertebrate predators by electrophoesis. Annals of Applied Biology 1978, 90:7-10.
53. Naranjo S.E., Ellsworth P.C., Hagler J.R. Conservation of natural enemies in cotton: role of insect growth regulators in management of Bemisia tabaci. Biological Control 2004, 30:52-72.
54. Naranjo S.E., Hagler J.R. Characterizing and estimating the effect of heteropteran predation. Predatory Heteroptera: Their Ecology and Use in Biological Control 1998, 171-197. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD. M. Coll, J.R. Ruberson (Eds.).
55. Naranjo S.E., Hagler J.R. Toward the quantification of predation with predator gut immunoassays: a new approach integrating functional response behavior. Biological Control 2001, 20:175-189.
56. Nordlund D.A., Hardee D.D. Lygus management. Southwestern Entomologist 2000, (23):127.
57. Perkins P.V., Watson T.F. Nabis alternatus as a predator of Lygus hesperus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1972, 65:625-629.
58. Rosenheim J.A., Wilhoit L.R., Armer C.A. Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of a herbivore population. Oecologia 1993, 96:439-449.
59. Scott W.P., Snodgrass G.L. A review of chemical control of the tarnished plant bug in cotton. Southwestern Entomologist 2000, (23):67-81.
60. Sheppard S.K., Bell J., Sunderland K.D., Fenlon J., Skervin D., Symondson W.O.C. Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4461-4468.
61. Sheppard S.K., Harwood J.D. Advances in molecular ecology: tracking trophic links through predator-prey food-webs. Functional Ecology 2005, 19:751-762.
62. Sheppard S.K., Henneman M.L., Memmott J., Symondson W.O.C. Infiltration by alien predators into invertebrate food webs in Hawaii: a molecular approach. Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:2077-2088.
63. Sopp P.I., Sunderland K.D. Some factors affecting detection period of aphid remains in predators using ELISA. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata 1989, 51:11-20.
64. Sunderland K.D. Progress in quantifying predation using antibody techniques. The Ecology of Agricultural Pests: Biochemical Approaches 1996, 419-455. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY. W.O.C. Symondson, J.E. Liddell (Eds.).
65. Symondson W.O.C. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology 2002, 11:627-641.
66. Symondson W.O.C., Glen D.M., Erickson M.L., Liddell J.E., Langdon C.J. Do earthworms help to sustain the slug predator Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae) within crops? Investigations using monoclonal antibodies. Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:1279-1292.
67. Tamaki G., Olsen D.P., Gupta R.K. Laboratory evaluation of Geocoris bullatus and Nabis alternatus as predators of Lygus. Journal Entomological Society of British Columbia 1978, 75:35-37.
68. Traugott M., Symondson W.O.C. Molecular analysis of predation on parasitized hosts. Bulletin Entomological Research 2008, 98:223-231.
69. Unruh T.R., Yu T., Willett L.S., Garczynski S.F., Horton D.R. Development of monoclonal antibodies to pear psylla (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and evaluation of field predation by two key predators. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2008, 101:887-898.
70. Von Berg K., Traugott M., Symondson W.O.C., Scheu S. The effects of temperature on detection of prey DNA in two species of carabid beetle. Bulletin Entomological Research 2008, 98:263-269.
71. Weber, D.C., Lundgren, J.G., 2009. Detection of predation using qPCR: effect of prey quantity, elapsed time, chaser diet, and sample preservation on detectable quantity of prey DNA. Journal of Insect Science, available online: insectscience.org/9.41.
72. Xu G., Brindley W.A. Structure of populations of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) with multiple resistance mechanisms to trichlorfon. Journal of Economic Entomology 1993, 86:1656-1663.
73. Zink A.G., Rosenheim J.A. Stage-specific predation on Lygus hesperus affects its population stage structure. Entomologia Experimentails et Applicata 2008, 126:61-66.