Process model generation from natural language text

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6741 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 482-496

  Friedrich, Fabian ^a   Mendling, Jan ^b   Puhlmann, Frank ^a  

^a Inubit AG   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; CENTRAL PROBLEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXT; ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE; PROBLEM-BASED; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS MODEL; TIME SPENT; AUTOMATIC APPROACHES; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960335582     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: An inductive approach to the acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI, pp. 52-57 (1999)
2. Frederiks, P., Van der Weide, T.: Information modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 58(1), 4-20 (2006)
3. Scheer, A.: ARIS-business process modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
4. Reijers, H., Limam, S., Van Der Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow design. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1), 229-262 (2003)
5. Gruber, T.: Automated knowledge acquisition for strategic knowledge. Machine Learning 4(3), 293-336 (1989)
6. Blumberg, R., Atre, S.: The problem with unstructured data. DM Review 13, 42-49 (2003)
7. White, M.: Information overlook. EContent(26:7) (2003)
8. OMG, eds.: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (June 2010)
9. Freund, J., Rücker, B., Henninger, T.: Praxishandbuch BPMN. Hanser (2010)
10. Melčuk, I.: Dependency syntax: theory and practice, New York (1988)
11. Marcus, M., Marcinkiewicz, M., Santorini, B.: Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2), 330 (1993)
12. de Marneffe, M., Manning, C.: The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In: Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, pp. 1-8 (2008)
13. Baker, C., Fillmore, C., Lowe, J.: The berkeley framenet project. In: 17th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 86-90 (1998)
14. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: A lexical database for english. CACM 38(11), 39-41 (1995)
15. Achour, C.B.: Guiding scenario authoring. In: 8th European-Japanese Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, pp. 152-171. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)
16. Li, J., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., Zhao, J.: A policy-based process mining framework: mining business policy texts for discovering process models. ISEB 8(2), 169-188
17. Yue, T., Briand, L., Labiche, Y.: An Automated Approach to Transform Use Cases into Activity Diagrams. Modelling Foundations and Appl., 337-353 (2010)
18. Fliedl, G., Kop, C., Mayr, H., Salbrechter, A., Vöhringer, J., Weber, G., Winkler, C.: Deriving static and dynamic concepts from software requirements using sophisticated tagging. Data & Knowledge Engineering 61(3), 433-448 (2007)
19. Kop, C., Mayr, H.: Conceptual predesign-bridging the gap between requirements and conceptual design. In: 3rd Int. Conf. on Requirements Eng. p. 90 (1998)
20. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G., Chueng, A.: Process Discovery from Model and Text Artefacts. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Services, pp. 167-174 (2007)
21. Ghose, A.K., Koliadis, G., Chueng, A.: Rapid business process discovery (R-BPD). In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 391-406. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
22. Sinha, A., Paradkar, A., Kumanan, P., Boguraev, B.: An Analysis Engine for Dependable Elicitation on Natural Language Use Case Description and its Application to Industrial Use Cases. Technical report, IBM (2008)
23. de AR Gonçalves, J.C., Santoro, F.M., Baião, F.A.: A case study on designing processes based on collaborative and mining approaches. In: Int. Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Shanghai, China (2010)
24. Fliedl, G., Kop, C., Mayr, H.: From textual scenarios to a conceptual schema. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55(1), 20-37 (2005)
25. Friedrich, F.: Automated generation of business process models from natural language input. Master's thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (November 2010)
26. Kitzmann, I., Konig, C., Lubke, D., Singer, L.: A Simple Algorithm for Automatic Layout of BPMN Processes. In: IEEE Conf. CEC, pp. 391-398 (2009)
27. Seemann, J.: Extending the sugiyama algorithm for drawing UML class diagrams: Towards automatic layout of object-oriented software diagrams. In: Graph Drawing, pp. 415-424. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
28. Eiglsperger, M., Kaufmann, M., Siebenhaller, M.: A topology-shape-metrics approach for the automatic layout of UML class diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, p. 189. ACM, New York (2003)
29. White, S., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide: Understanding and Using BPMN. Future Strategies Inc. (2008)
30. Holschke, O.: Impact of granularity on adjustment behavior in adaptive reuse of business process models. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 112-127. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
31. Reijers, H.: Design and control of workflow processes: business process management for the service industry. Eindhoven University Press (2003)
32. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf. Sys. 36, 498-516 (2010)
33. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Garcia-Banuelos, L., Käärik, R.: Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
34. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: On application of structural decomposition for process model abstraction. In: 2nd Int. Conf. BPSC, pp. 110-122 (March 2009)
35. Kop, C., Vöhringer, J., Hölbling, M., Horn, T., Irrasch, C., Mayr, H.: Tool Supported Extraction of Behavior Models. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. ISTA (2005)
36. Yue, T., Briand, L., Labiche, Y.: Automatically Deriving a UML Analysis Model from a Use Case Model. Technical report, Carleton University (2009)
37. Wang, H.J., Zhao, J.L., Zhang, L.J.: Policy-Driven Process Mapping (PDPM): Discovering process models from business policies. DSS 48(1), 267-281 (2009)
38. Sinha, A., Paradkar, A.: Use Cases to Process Specifications in Business Process Modeling Notation. In: 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. on Web Services, pp. 473-480 (2010)
39. Shi, L., Mihalcea, R.: Putting Pieces Together: Combining FrameNet, VerbNet and WordNet for Robust Semantic Parsing. In: Proceedings of the 6th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, p. 100 (2005)