Impact of granularity on adjustment behavior in adaptive reuse of business process models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6336 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 112-127

  Holschke, Oliver ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PROCESS DESIGN;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; COGNITIVE EFFORTS; COGNITIVE PROCESS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EXPERIMENT SET-UP; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROCESS SIMILARITIES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 78049294672     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Leontiev, A. N.: Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1978)
2. Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P., Neece, O. E.: Knowledge Reuse for Innovation. Management Science 50(2), 174-188 (2004)
3. March, J. G.: Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2(1), 71-87 (1991)
4. Frakes, W., Kang, K.: Software reuse research: status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(7), 529-536 (2005) (Pubitemid 41387747)
5. Rothenberger, M. A., Dooley, K. J., Kulkarni, U. R., Nada, N.: Strategies for Software Reuse: A Principal Component Analysis of Reuse Practices. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29(9), 825-837 (2003)
6. Kelly, M.: Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM) - The Business Process Framework, TeleManagement Forum (2007)
7. Supply-Chain Council: Supply Chain Operations Reference-model Version 8.0, Supply-Chain Council, Inc. (2006)
8. Holschke, O., Rake, J., Levina, O.: Granularity as a Cognitive Factor in the Effectiveness of Business Process Model Reuse. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H. A., et al. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 245-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
9. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application Information Systems and E-Business Management 1, 35-53 (2003)
10. Soffer, P., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Sturm, A.: Facilitating Reuse by Specialization of Reference Models for Business Process Design. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS 2007) in Conjunction with the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2007(2007)
11. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y.: External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal Human-Computer Studies 45, 185-213 (1996) (Pubitemid 126360243)
12. Larkin, J. H., Simon, H. A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65-100 (1987)
13. Prieto-Diaz, R.: Status report: Software reusability. IEEE Software 10(3), 61-66 (1993)
14. Reijers, H., Mendling, J.: Modularity in process models: review and effects. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 20-35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
15. Moody, D. L.: The "Physics" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(6), 756-779 (2009)
16. Batra, D., Wishart, N. A.: Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(4), 397-419 (2004)
17. Plous, S.: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)
18. Parsons, J., Saunders, C.: Cognitive Heuristics in Software Engineering: Applying and Extending Anchoring and Adjustment to Artifact Reuse. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 873-888 (2004) (Pubitemid 41158280)
19. Yao, Y.: Probabilistic approaches to rough sets. Expert Systems 20(5), 287-297 (2003)
20. Yao, Y.: A Partition Model of Granular Computing. LNCS Transactions on Rough Sets 1, 232-253 (2004) (Pubitemid 38977873)
21. United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT): Core Components Technical Specification, Version 3.0, United Nations (September 29, 2009)
22. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. Requirements Engineering 9(4), 248-260 (2004)
23. Teo, H.-H., Chan, H. C., Wei, K. K.: Performance Effects of Formal Modeling Language Differences: A Combined Abstraction Level and Construct Complexity Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49(2), 160-175 (2006)
24. Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Information Systems 35(4), 467-482 (2009)
25. Kerlinger, F. N.: Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Orlando, FL (1986)
26. Lindland, I., Sindre, G., Solvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11, 42-49 (1994)
27. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 91-102 (2006) (Pubitemid 43323397)
28. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 358-380 (2006) (Pubitemid 43994225)
29. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Park, S.-J.: Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge. Information Systems Research 17(1), 81-99 (2006) (Pubitemid 43450180)
30. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models. In: Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2007). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Ballarat (2007) (Pubitemid 47568474)
31. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Banuelos, L.: Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Similarity Search. In: Dayal, U., et al. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
32. van Dongen, B. F., Dijkman, R. M., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450-464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
33. Robinson, P.: Task Complexity, Task Difficulty, and Task Production: Exploring Interactions in a Componential Framework. Applied Linguistics 22(1), 27-57 (2001) (Pubitemid 33227877)
34. Campbell, D. J.: Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. Academy of Management Review 13(1), 40-52 (1988)
35. Larkey, L. S.: Automatic Essay Grading Using Text Categorization Techniques. In: 21st annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 90-95. ACM, New York (1998)
36. Prabhu, N.: Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)
37. Signavio GmbH: Signavio (2009), http://academic.signavio.com [cited 17.3.2010]
38. Boh, W. F.: Reuse of knowledge assets from repositories: a mixed methods study. Information & Management 45 (July) 365-375 (2008)