When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 500, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 10-15

  Sambo, Chiara F ^a,b   Forster, Bettina ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Mirror; Peripersonal space; Visuo tactile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MIRROR REFLECTED VISUAL STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960326947     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.233     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Avillac M., Ben Hamed S., Duhamel J.R. Multisensory integration in the ventral intraparietal area of the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:1922-1932.
2. Bertamini M., Berselli N., Bode C., Lawson R., Wong L.T. The rubber hand illusion in a mirror. Conscious. Cogn. 2011, (April). [Epub ahead of print].
3. Bertamini M., Lawson R., Liu D. Understanding 2D projections on mirrors and on windows. Spatial Vision 2008, 21:273-289.
4. Berti A., Rizzolatti G. Coding near and far space. The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect 2002, 119-129. Oxford University Press, New York. H.-O. Karnath, A.D. Milner, G. Vallar (Eds.).
5. Duhamel J.R., Golby C.L., Goldberg M.E. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79:126-136.
6. Fogassi L., Gallese V., Fadiga L., Luppino G., Matelli M., Rizzolatti G. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 76:141-157.
7. Forster B., Eimer M. Covert spatial attention in touch: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for costs and benefits. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:171-179.
8. Graziano M.S., Gross C.G. A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp. Brain Res. 1993, 97:96-109.
9. Heed T., Roder B. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:184-202.
10. Helbig H.B., Ernst M.O. Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception 2007, 36:1523-1533.
11. Holmes N., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 372:62-67.
12. Holmes N., Spence C. The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn. Proc. 2004, 5:94-105.
13. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Obayashi S., Iwamura Y. Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neurosci. Res. 2001, 40:163-173.
14. Làdavas E. Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6:17-22.
15. Làdavas E., Farnè A. Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. J. Physiol.-Paris 2004, 98:161-170.
16. Lawson R., Bertamini M. Errors in judging information about reflections on mirrors. Perception 2006, 35:1265-1288.
17. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:977-981.
18. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 177:285-290.
19. Macaluso E., Driver J. Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28:264-271.
20. Macaluso E., Maravita A. The representation of space near the body through touch and vision. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:782-795.
21. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:731-740.
22. Maravita A., Spence C., Clarke K., Husain M., Driver J. Vision and touch through the looking glass in a case of crossmodal extinction. Neuroreport 2000, 11:3521-3526.
23. Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 2002, 83:B25-34.
24. Maravita A., Spence C., Sergent C., Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates crossmodal interactions. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13:350-355.
25. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. The space around us. Science 1997, 277:190-191.
26. Sambo C.F., Forster B. An ERP investigation on visuo-tactile interactions in peripersonal and extra-personal space: evidence for the spatial rule. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:1550-1559.
27. Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., Woldorff M.G. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:400-410.