Understanding 2D projections on mirrors and on windows

Spatial Vision

Volumn 21, Issue 3-5, 2008, Pages 273-289

  Bertamini, Marco ^a   Lawson, Rebecca ^a   Liu, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b SHAANXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Mirror; Naive physics; Picture perception; Viewpoint

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; MIRRORS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WINDOWS;

(1 1 0) SURFACE; FIELD OF VIEW (FOV); GENERAL (CO); OBSERVER (OBS); TARGET OBJECTS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL (2D) PROJECTIONS;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PAINTING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAINTINGS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 46349091917     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: 15685683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856808784532527     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bertamini, M. and Parks, T. E. (2005). On what people know about images on mirrors, Cognition 98, 85-104.
2. Bertamini, M., Latto, R. and Spooner, A. (2003). The Venus effect: people's understanding of mirror reflections in paintings, Perception 32, 593-599.
3. Bertamini, M., Spooner, A. and Hecht, H. (2003). Naive optics: predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 29, 982-1002.
4. Croucher, C. J., Bertamini, M. and Hecht, H. (2002). Naive optics: understanding the geometry of mirror reflections, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 28, 546-562.
5. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
6. Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and Illusion. Phaidon Press, Oxford, UK.
7. Gregory, R. L. (1997). Mirrors in Mind. Penguin, London, UK.
8. Hagen, M. A. (1986). Varieties of Realism: Geometries of Representational Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Hayter, C. (1813). An Introduction to Perspective, Drawing, and Painting: In a Series of Pleasing and Familiar Dialogues Between the Author's Children. Black, Parry, and Co. London, UK.
10. Hecht, H., Bertamini, M. and Gamer, M. (2005). Naive optics: acting upon mirror reflections, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 31, 1023-1038.
11. Hecht, H., Schwartz, R. and Atherton, M. (Eds) (2003). Looking into Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space. Cambridge, MIT Press, MA, USA.
12. von Helmholtz, H. (1867/1925). Treatise on Physiological Optics (trans. from 3rd German edn). Dover, New York, USA.
13. Higashiyama, A. and Shimono, K. (2004). Mirror vision: perceived size and perceived distance of virtual images, Perception and Psychophysics 66, 679-691.
14. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T. and Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look, Psycholog. Sci. 14, 201-206.
15. Koenderink, J. J. (1990). Solid Shape. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
16. Kubovy, M. (1986). The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Lawson, R. and Bertamini, M. (2006). Errors in judging information about reflections on mirrors, Perception 35, 1265-1288.
18. Lawson, R., Bertamini, M. and Liu, D. (2007). Overestimation of the projected size of objects on the surface of mirrors and windows. J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 33, 1027-1044.
19. Masuda, T. and Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans, J. Personality Social Psychol. 81, 922-934.
20. Melchior-Bonnet, S. (2001). The Mirror. Routledge, London, UK.
21. Nisbett, R. E. and Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception, Trends Cognit. Sci. 9, 467-473.
22. Pirenne, M. (1970). Optics, Painting, and Photography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Ross, H. E. and Plug, C. (1998). The history of size constancy and size illusions, in: Perceptual Constancies: Why Things Look as They Do, V. Walsh and Kulikowski, J. (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. ter Haar Romeny, B. M. and Florack, L. M. J. (2000). Front-end vision: a multiscale geometry engine, Lectures Notes in Computer Science 1811, 297-307.
25. Willats, J. (2003). Optical laws or symbolic rules? The dual nature of pictorial systems, in: Looking into Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space, Hecht, H., Schwartz, R. and Atherton, M. (Eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
26. Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and Its Objects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.