Direct and socially-mediated effects of food availability late in life on life-history variation in a short-lived lizard

Oecologia

Volumn 166, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 949-960

  Mugabo, Marianne ^a   Marquis, Olivier ^a   Perret, Samuel ^b   Le Galliard, Jean François ^a,b  

^a UPMC University Paris 06   (France)

^b ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

Allocation strategies; Asymmetric competition; Density dependence; Food deprivation; Zootoca vivipara

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; BREEDING SEASON; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DENSITY DEPENDENCE; ENCLOSURE EXPERIMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FOOD AVAILABILITY; GROWTH RESPONSE; IMMUNOCOMPETENCE; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LIZARD; LOADING; MORPHOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; SURVIVAL; YOUNG POPULATION;

AGE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; IMMUNOCOMPETENCE; LIZARD; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; IMMUNOCOMPETENCE; LIZARDS; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

SQUAMATA; ZOOTOCA VIVIPARA;

EID: 79960308107     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1933-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews RM (1982) Patterns of growth in reptiles. In: Gans G, Pough FH (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 13. Academic, New York, pp 273-320.
2. Aubret F, Bonnet X, Shine R, Lourdais O (2002) Fat is sexy for females but not males: the influence of body reserves on reproduction in snakes (Vipera aspis). Horm Behav 42: 135-147.
3. Avery RA (1971) Estimates of food consumption by the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. J Anim Ecol 40: 351-365.
4. Avery RA (1975) Clutch size and reproductive effort in the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. Oecologia 19: 165-170.
5. Bateson P et al (2004) Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 430: 419-421.
6. Bauwens D, Verheyen RF (1985) The timing of reproduction in the lizards Lacerta vivipara: differences between individual females. J Herpetol 19: 353-364.
7. Bauwens D, van Damme R, Verheyen RF (1989) Synchronization of spring molting behaviour with the onset of mating behavior in male lizards, Lacerta vivipara. J Herpetol 23: 89-91.
8. Beckerman A, Benton TG, Lapsley CT, Koesters N (2003) Talkin' 'bout my generation: environmental variability and cohort effects. Am Nat 162: 754-767.
9. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ (1999) Nestling diet, secondary sexual traits and fitness in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond B 266: 385-390.
10. Bolker BM et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 127-135.
11. Brommer JE, Karell P, Pietiainen H (2004) Supplementary fed Ural owls increase their reproductive output with a one year time lag. Oecologia 139: 354-358.
12. Bystrom P, Andersson J (2005) Size-dependent foraging capacities and intercohort competition in an ontogenetic omnivore (Arctic char). Oikos 110: 523-536.
13. Claessen D, de Roos AM, Persson L (2000) Dwarfs and giants: Cannibalism and competition in size-structured populations. Am Nat 155: 219-237.
14. de Roos AM, Persson L, McCauley E (2003) The influence of size-dependent life-history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities. Ecol Lett 6: 473-487.
15. Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent-energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68: 225-252.
16. Fitze PS, Le Galliard JF (2008) Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection. Ecol Lett 11: 432-439.
17. Fitze PS, Cote J, Martinez-Rica JP, Clobert J (2008) Determinants of male fitness: disentangling intra- and inter-sexual selection. J Evol Biol 21: 246-255.
18. González-Suárez M, Mugabo M, Decencière B, Perret S, Claessen D, Le Galliard JF (2011) Disentangling the effects of predator body size and prey density on prey consumption in a lizard. Funct Ecol 25: 158-165.
19. Grafen A (1988) On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 454-471.
20. Heino M, Kaitala V (1999) Evolution of resource allocation between growth and reproduction in animals with indeterminate growth. J Evol Biol 12: 423-429.
21. Kooijman SALM (2000) Dynamic energy and mass budgets in biological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Koskela E, Jonsson P, Hartikainen T, Mappes T (1998) Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and litter size in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 1129-1134.
23. Kratochvil L, Fokt M, Rehak I, Frynta D (2003) Misinterpretation of character scaling: a tale of sexual dimorphism in body shape of common lizards. Can J Zool Rev Can Zool 81: 1112-1117.
24. Kubicka L, Kratochvil L (2009) First grow, then breed and finally get fat: hierarchical allocation to life-history traits in a lizard with invariant clutch size. Funct Ecol 23: 595-601.
25. Le Galliard J-F, Ferrière R, Clobert J (2005) Juvenile growth and survival under dietary restriction: are males and females equal? Oikos 111: 368-376.
26. Lecomte J, Clobert J, Massot M, Barbault R (1994) Spatial and behavioural consequences of a density manipulation in the common lizard. Ecoscience 1: 300-310.
27. Lummaa V, Clutton-Brock T (2002) Early development, survival and reproduction in humans. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 141-147.
28. Marquis O, Massot M, Le Galliard J-F (2008) Intergenerational effects of climate generate cohort variation in lizard reproductive performance. Ecology 89: 2575-2583.
29. Martin LB, Navara KJ, Weil ZM, Nelson RJ (2007) Immunological memory is compromised by food restriction in deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292: R316-R320.
30. Massot M, Clobert J (1995) Influence of maternal food availability on offspring dispersal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37: 413-418.
31. Massot M, Clobert J, Pilorge T, Lecomte J, Barbault R (1992) Density dependence in the common lizard: demographic consequences of a density manipulation. Ecology 73: 1742-1756.
32. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16: 254-260.
33. Mugabo M, Marquis O, Perret S, Le Galliard JF (2010) Immediate and delayed life history effects caused by food deprivation early in life in a short-lived lizard. J Evol Biol 23: 1886-1898.
34. Nagy KA (1983) Ecological energetics. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 24-54.
35. Olsson M, Shine R (1997) The limits to reproductive output: offspring size versus number in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Am Nat 149: 179-188.
36. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.
37. Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Benton TG (2006) Context-dependent intergenerational effects: the interaction between past and present environments and its effect on population dynamics. Am Nat 167: 206-215.
38. Saino N, Calza S, Ninni P, Moller AP (1999) Barn swallows trade survival against offspring condition and immunocompetence. J Anim Ecol 68: 999-1009.
39. Schwarzkopf L (1994) Measuring trade-offs: a review of studies of cost of reproduction in lizards. In: Vitt LJ, Pianka ER (eds) Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 7-29.
40. Tschirren B, Rutstein AN, Postma E, Mariette M, Griffith SC (2009) Short- and long-term consequences of early developmental conditions: a case study on wild and domesticated zebra finches. J Evol Biol 22: 387-395.
41. van de Wolfshaar KE, de Roos AM, Persson L (2008) Population feedback after successful invasion leads to ecological suicide in seasonal environments. Ecology 89: 259-268.
42. Vinkler M, Bainova H, Albrecht T (2010) Functional analysis of the skin-swelling response to phytohaemagglutinin. Funct Ecol 24: 1081-1086.