An exploratory approach to process lifecycle transitions from a paradigm-based perspective

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 81 LNBIP, Issue , 2011, Pages 178-185

  Caron, Filip ^a   Vanthienen, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Business Process Management; Process Enactment; Process Modeling; Transitions

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS ENACTMENT; PROCESS LIFECYCLE; PROCESS MODELING;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 79960305226     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Zisman, M.: Representation, specification and automation of office procedures. PhD thesis, Wharton School (1977)
2. van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support. Computer Science-Research and Development 23(2), 99-113 (2009)
3. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Configuration and management of process variants. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 237-255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
4. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Governatori, G.: On managing business processes variants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(7), 642-664 (2009)
5. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W.: Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows. Information Systems 30(5), 349-378 (2005)
6. Group, O.M.: Business process modeling notation (bpmn) 1.1 (2006)
7. Ellis, C., Nutt, G.: Modeling and enactment of workflow systems. In: Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1993, pp. 1-16 (1993)
8. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: In: An Overview of Declarative Process Modeling Principles and Languages. Communications of systemics and informatics world network, vol. 6, pp. 51-58 (2009)
9. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Flexibility as a service. In: Chen, L., Liu, C., Liu, Q., Deng, K. (eds.) DASFAA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5667, pp. 319-333. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
10. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., Aalst, W.: Process flexibility: A survey of contemporary approaches. In: Advances in Enterprise Engineering I, pp. 16-30 (2008)
11. Kumar, A., Yao, W.: Process Materialization Using Templates and Rules to Design Flexible Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications, pp. 122-136. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
12. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the Provop approach. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice
13. Sinur, J.: The art and science of rules vs. process flows. Gartner Research, ID Number G00166408 (March 2009)
14. Keller, G., Nuttgens, M., Scheer, A.: Semantische Prozessmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK). Inst. fur Wirtschaftsinformatik (1992)
15. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. Association for Information Systems (2010)
16. Kappel, G., Rausch-Schott, S., Retschitzegger, W.: Coordination in workflow management systems a rule-based approach. In: Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications, pp. 99-119 (1998)
17. Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management, pp. 169-180 (2006)
18. van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M.: DecSerFlow: Towards a truly declarative service flow language. In: Web Services and Formal Methods, pp. 1-23 (2006)
19. OASIS: Web services business process execution language 2.0 (2007)
20. van der Aalst, W., Ter Hofstede, A.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems 30(4), 245-275 (2005)
21. Pesic, M., Aalst, W., Eijnatten, F.: Constraint-based workflow management systems: shifting control to users. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2008)
22. Yu, J., Manh, T.P., Han, J., Jin, Y., Han, Y., Wang, J.: Pattern based property specification and verification for service composition. In: Aberer, K., Peng, Z., Rundensteiner, E.A., Zhang, Y., Li, X. (eds.) WISE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4255, pp. 156-168. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
23. Zeng, L., Flaxer, D., Chang, H., Jeng, J.: PLM flow-Dynamic Business Process Composition and Execution by Rule Inference. In: Technologies for E-Services, pp. 51-95 (2002)
24. Paschke, A., Boley, H.: Rules capturing events and reactivity. In: Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches, IGI Publishing (2009)
25. Decker, G., Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Transforming BPMN diagrams into YAWL nets. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 386-389. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
26. Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., Aalst, W., Hofstede, A., Mendling, J.: From business process models to process-oriented software systems. ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology (TOSEM) 19(1), 1-37 (2009)
27. Recker, J., Mendling, J.: On the translation between BPMN and BPEL: Conceptual mismatch between process modeling languages. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (2006)
28. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Deriving active rules for workflow enactment. In: Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 94-115. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
29. Dumas, M., Fjellheim, T., Milliner, S., Vayssière, J.: Event-based coordination of process-oriented composite applications. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 236-251. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
30. El Maghraoui, K., Meghranjani, A., Eilam, T., Kalantar, M., Konstantinou, A.V.: Model driven provisioning: Bridging the gap between declarative object models and procedural provisioning tools. In: van Steen, M., Henning, M. (eds.) Middleware 2006. LNCS, vol. 4290, pp. 404-423. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
31. Hendler, J., Tate, A., Drummond, M.: AI planning: Systems and techniques. AI Magazine 11(2), 61 (1990)
32. Friedler, F., Tarjan, K., Huang, Y., Fan, L.: Combinatorial algorithms for process synthesis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 16, S313-S320 (1992)
33. Liu, J., Fan, L., Seib, P., Friedler, F., Bertok, B.: Downstream process synthesis for biochemical production of butanol, ethanol, and acetone from grains: Generation of optimal and near-optimal flowsheets with conventional operating units. Biotechnology Progress 20(5), 1518-1527 (2004)
34. Fahland, D., Mendling, J., Reijers, H., Weber, B., Weidlich, M., Zugal, S.: Declarative vs. Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability. In: 1st International Workshop on Empirical Research in Business Process Management, Ulm, Germany, pp. 65-76 (2009)
35. Regev, G., Soffer, P., Schmidt, R.: Taxonomy of flexibility in business processes. In: Regev, G., Soffer, P., Schmidt, R. (eds.) BPMDS (2006)
36. Weber, B., Sadiq, S., Reichert, M.: Beyond rigidity-dynamic process lifecycle support. Computer Science-Research and Development 23(2), 47-65 (2009)
37. Schmidt, R.: Flexibility in Service Processes. In: BPMDS 2006 (2006)
38. Bider, I.: Masking flexibility behind rigidity: Notes on how much flexibility people are willing to cope with. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE, vol. 5, pp. 7-18 (2005)