Rights transmission by mimeis: The biomedicine convention in central Europe

Journal of Human Rights

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 427-444

  Frances, Millard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960294443     PISSN: 14754835     EISSN: 14754843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2010.522924     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ABBING, Henriette, D.C. Roscam. (1998) The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Journal of Health Law, 5, 377-387.
2. AFFORD, CarlWarren. (2003) Corrosive Reform: Failing Health Systems in Eastern Europe (Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office).
3. BAUMGARTNER, Holger. (2001) The European Protocol on Organ Transplantation does not meet public expectations. Journal international de bióethique, 12(3), 25-32.
4. BECKMANN, Jan. (2004) On the German debate on human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(5), 603-621.
5. BEYLEVALD, Deryck, TOWNEND, David, ROUILĹ E-MIRZA, Segolene, and WRIGHT, Jessica (eds.). (2004) Implementation of the Data Protection Directive in Relation to Medical Research in Europe (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).
6. BIESAGA, Tadeusz. (2006) Europejska Konwencja Bioetyczna. Medycyna Praktyczna, 11. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.pl/artykuly/index.php?aid=30361&tc=790DC383A797472EB5F14668A8071562 [3 June 2010].
7. BIRMONTIENE, Toma. (2002) Changes in the Lithuanian Health Law and the influence of the Netherlands Civil Code. European Journal of Health Law, 9, 381-395.
8. BULGARIAN PARLIAMENT. (2003) Report. [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.bg/?page=app&lng=bg&aid=4&action=show&lid=471.
9. CABE, Inga. (2004) The implementation of Directive 95/46/EC into National Legislation with regard to medical research in Latvia. In Implementation of the Data Protection Directive in Relation to Medical Research in Europe, Deryck Beylevald, David Townend, S. Rouilĺe-Mirza, and J. Wright (eds.) (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).
10. CHERRY, Mark. (2002) The search for a global bioethics: Fraudulent claims and false promises. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(6), 683-698.
11. COMISIAJURIDIC A, DEDISCIPLINǍ S, Iimunitǎt I.(2000) Aviz Nr. 24, 25May 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdep.ro/comisii/juridica/pdf/2000/av224.pdf.
12. COMISIA PENTRU DREPTURILE OMULUI, CULTE Ş I PROBLEMELE MINORITǍ Ţ ILOR NAŢ IONALE. (2001) Report. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdep.ro/comisii/drepturile omului/pdf/2001/rp224 00.pdf.
13. COMISIA PENTRU POLITIČA EXTERNǍ. (2000) Aviz Nr. XVIII/13/ 343. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdep.ro/comisii/politica externa/pdf/2000/av224.pdf.
14. COMISIA PENTRU SǍ NǍ TATE Ş I FAMILIE. (2000)) Aviz Nr.147/XVIII/8. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdep.ro/comisii/sanatate/pdf/2000/av224.pdf.
15. COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE (CSCE). (2006) Accountability and Impunity: Investigations Into Sterilization Without Informed Consent in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, Washington, DC, August. [Online]. Available: http: //www.csce.gov/index.cfm?Fuseaction=ContentRecords.ViewTranscript&ContentRecord id= 378&ContentType=H,B&ContentRecordType=B&CFID=22744580&CFTOKEN=55773805 [30 September 2010].
16. COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (1997) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, Oviedo. [Online]. Available: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm.
17. COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (1998) Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings. 12 January. [Online].Available: http://conventions. coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/168.htm.
18. COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (2009) Report to the Czech Government on the visit to the Czech Republic carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 25 March to 2 April 2008, Strasbourg, 5 February 2009. [Online]. Available: http://cpt.coe.int/documents/cze/2009-08-inf-eng.htm.
19. CUTAS, Daniela-Ecaterina. (2005) Looking for the meaning of dignity in the bioethics convention and the cloning protocol. Health Care Analysis, 13(4), 303-313.
20. CZECH REPUBLIC GOVERNMENT. (2009) Response of the Czech Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to the Czech Republic from 25 March to 2 April 2008, Strasbourg, 5 February. [Online]. Available; http://cpt.coe.int/documents/cze/2009-09-inf-eng.htm.
21. DELKESKAMP-HAYES, Corinna. (2000) Respecting, protecting, persons, humans, and conceptual muddles in the Bioethics Convention. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(2), 147-180.
22. DOBROVOLSKIS, Romualdas. (2002) Aǐskinamasis [Explanation], IXP-1780, 7 September 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc l?p id=171248.
23. DOLOWITZ, David, and MARSH, David. (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5-24.
24. DOMMEL, F.William Jr., and ALEXANDER, Duane. (1997) The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(3), 259-276.
25. ELSTER, Jon, OFFE, Claus, and PREUSS, Ulrich. (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
26. ENSOR, Tim, and DURAN-MORENO, Antonio. (2002) Corruption as a challenge to effective regulation in the health sector. In Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European health Care Systems, Richard Saltman, Reinhard Busse, and Elias Mossialos (eds.) (Buckingham: Open University Press).
27. ESTONIAN PARLIAMENT. (2000) Stenographic Report. [Online]. Available: http://web.riigikogu. ee/ems/stenograms/2000/09/t00092002-10.html.
28. FALKNER, Gerda, and TREIB, Oliver. (2008) Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-16 compared to new member states. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 293-313.
29. Fallberg, Lars. (2003) A Review of the Rights of Patients in Latvia, 10 March (unpublished report).
30. Fallberg, Lars. (2005) Comment on the Latvian Draft Law on the Rights of Patients, 23 March (unpublished report).
31. FIGUERAS, Josep, MCKEE, Martin, and LESSOF, Suzy. (2002) Ten years of health sector reform in CEE and NIS: An Overview. USAID Conference on Ten Years of Health Systems Transition in Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, Washington DC, July (draft).
32. FISER, Bohumil. (2001). Stenograficḱy źapis 34. sch°uze, 28 February. [Online]. Available: http: //www.psp.cz/eknih/1998ps/stenprot/034schuz/34-6.html.
33. GLASA, Jozef. (2000) Ethics committees [HECs/IRBs] and healthcare reform in the Slovak Republic 1990-2000. HEC Forum, 12(4), 358-366.
34. GOETZ, Klaus H. (2005) The new member states and the EU: Responding to Europe. In The Member States of the European Union, S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds.) (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
35. GOVERNMENT OF ESTONIA. (2001) The Human Genes Research Act. [Online]. Available: http: //www.who.int.genomics/elsi/regulatory data/region/euro/078/en/index.html
36. GRZESKOWIAK, Alicja. (1999) Report of the Meeting of Senate Marshal Alicja on 20 December 1999 with Doctors and Theologians Associated with the Catholic Church. [Online]. Available: http://www.senat.gov.pl/K4/DOK/DIAR/05/0504.HTM [22 July 2010].
37. GRZYMALA-Busse, Anna, and INNES, Abby. (2003) Great expectations: The EU and domestic political competition in East Central Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 17(1), 64- 73.
38. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and RON, James. (2009) Seeing double: Human rights impact through qualitative and quantitative eyes. World Politics, 61(2), 360-401.
39. HOSPITAL COMMITTEE OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY. (1979) Charter of the Hospital Patient, Luxembourg. 9 May. [Online]. Available: http://www.hope.be/ 05eventsandpublications/docpublications/07 charter/07 charterpatients 1979.pdf.
40. HOTTOIS, Gilbert. (2010) A philosophical and critical analysis of the European Convention of Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(2), 133-146.
41. HULME, Rob. (2006) The role of policy transfer in assessing the impact of American ideas on British social policy. Global Social Policy, 6(2), 173-195.
42. HUNGARIAN PARLIAMENT. (2002) Proceedings. Magyar Kozlony, 2002/29, 1798-1814.
43. Hyde-Price, Adrian. (1996) The International Politics of East Central Europe (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press).
44. KOH Harold Hongju. (1996) Transnational legal process. Nebraska Law Review, 75(1), 181-207.
45. Komisiapreotá Zkybioetiky[Commission onBioethics]. (1998) Stanovisko k problematike klonovania cloveka, 25 April. [Online]. Available: http://www.kbs.sk/do pdf/index.php?cid= 1117107295 [2 April 2010].
46. Komiteto Isvada. (2002) Report IXP-1780, 9 September. [Online]. Available: http://www3. lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.susije l?p id=181798 and http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska. susije l?p id=181811.
47. KORTS, Külliki, WELDON, Sue, and GUDMUNDSDÓ TTIR, Margrét Lilja. (2004) Genetic databases and public attitudes: A comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK. Trames, 8(1/2), 131-149.
48. KRIZOVA, Eva, and SIMEK, Jiri. (2007) Theory and practice of informed consent in the Czech Republic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33 (May), 272-277.
49. LANDMAN, Todd. (2005) The political science of human rights. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 549-572.
50. LATHAM, Melanie, and LEONARD, Siobhan. (2001) The European Convention on Biomedicine and the Human Rights Act 1998: Grasping the nettle of biomedicine? In Healthcare: The Impact of the Human Right Act 1998, Austen Garwood-Gowers, John Tingle and Tom Lewis (eds.) (London, UK: Cavendish).
51. LATVIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND ETHNIC STUDIES. (2005) Human Rights in Latvia in 2004, May. [Online]. Available: http://www.am.gov.lv/data/file/e/parskats2004 en.pdf [30 September 2010].
52. LATVIAN PARLIAMENT. (2001a) Stenographic Report of 25 January. [Online]. Available; http:// www.saeima.lv/steno/2001/st2501.html.
53. LATVIAN PARLIAMENT. (2001b) Stenographic Report of 26 April. [Online]. Available: http:// www.saeima.lv/steno/2001/st 2604/st2604.html.
54. LATVIAN PARLIAMENT. (2006) Stenographic Report of 14 December. [Online]. Available: http://www.saeima.lv/steno/Saeima9/061214/st061214.htm#s24.
55. LATVIAN PARLIAMENT. (2009) Stenographic Report of 10 December. [Online]. Available: http://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS/SaeimaLIVS.nsf/0/3EF1B321F88F85D5C225768C00423391? OpenDocument.
56. LAW ON HEALTH CARE, SLOVENIA. (1992) Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 9, 590-601.
57. LAW OF 6 NOVEMBER 2008 ON PATIENTS' RIGHTS AND THE OMBUDSMAN FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS. (2008) Dziennik Ustaw z 31 marca 2009, no. 52, position 417.
58. LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENT. (2000) Law on the Ethics of Biomedical Research, Law VIII-1679, 5 May (trans.). [Online]. Available: http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter2/dokpaieska.showdoc e?p id = 148740
59. LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENT. (2002) Stenographic Report of 19 September 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter2/dokpaieska.showdoc l?p id=185108.
60. MAIO, Giovanni. (2004) The embryo in relationships: A French debate on stem cell research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(5), 583-602.
61. MALBY, Steven. (2002) Human dignity and human reproductive cloning. Health and Human Rights, 6(1), 103-136.
62. MALIK, Khaleel, and CUNNINGHAM, Paul. (2006) Transnational policy learning in Europe: Attempts to transfer innovation policy practices. Innovation: Management, Policy&Practice, 8(3), 262-272.
63. MANUEL, C., et al. (1999). Is the legislation of European states in keeping with the recent convention on human rights and biomedicine? European Journal of Health Law, 6, 55-69.
64. MCMENAMIN, Iain, and TIMONEN, Virpi. (2002) Poland's health reform: Politics, markets and informal payments. Journal of Social Policy, 31(1), 103-118.
65. MENTAL DISABILITY ADVISORY CENTRE. (2003) Cage Beds: Inhuman and Degrading Treatment in Four EU Accession Countries, Budapest: MDAC. [Online]. Available: http:// www.mdac.info/documents/118 MDAC Cage Bed Report.pdf [30 September 2010].
66. MORI, Maurizio, and NERI, Demetrio. (2001) Perils and deficiencies of the European convention on human rights and biomedicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26(3), 323-333.
67. MORAVCSIK, Andrew. (2000) The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization, 54(2), 217-252.
68. NESTOR, Eiki. (2000) Statement in the Riigikogu, 20 September. [Online]. Available: http://web. riigikogu.ee/ems/stenograms/2000/09/t00092002-10.html.
69. NEUMAYER, Eric. (2005) Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925-953.
70. NYS, Herman, et al. (2007) Patient rights in EUMember States after the ratification of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Health Policy, 83, 223-235.
71. PAYNE, Jir. (2001) Stenograficḱy źapis 34. sch°uze, 28 February 2001. [Online]. Available: http:// www.psp.cz/eknih/1998ps/stenprot/034schuz/34-6.html.
72. PLOMER, Aurora. (2001) Medical research, consent and the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. In Healthcare: The Impact of the Human Right Act 1998, Austen Garwood- Gowers, John Tingle, Tom Lewis (eds.) (London, UK: Cavendish).
73. POGONY, Istvan. (1995) A new constitutional (dis)order for Eastern Europe. In Human Rights in Eastern Europe Istvan Pogony (ed.) (Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar).
74. PREKER, Alexander, MELITTA Jakab, and SCHNEIDER Marcus. (2002) Health financing reforms in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. In Funding health care: options for Europe, Elias Mossialos, Anna Dixon, Josep Figueras, and Joe Kutzin (eds.) (Buckingham: Open University Press).
75. REUTER, Lars. (2000) Human is what is born of a human: Personhood, rationality, and an European Convention. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(2), 181-194.
76. RIIGIKOGU. (2001) Stenographic Report. [Online]. Available: http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/ stenograms/2001/10/t01101705-18.html#P1328 341378.
77. RIIGIKOGU PÕ HISEADUSKOMISJONI. (2001) Protokoll nr. 130/198, 8 October. [Online]. Available: http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdoc?itemid=012960018&login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne11
78. http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdoc?itemid=020140010&login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne11.
79. RISSE, Thomas, ROPP, Stephen, and SIKKINK, Kathryn. (1999) The Power of Human Rights (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
80. ROMANIAN PARLIAMENT. (2001) Stenographic Report of Debate of 6 February. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/steno/steno.stenograma?ids=5054&idm=11.
81. Sándor, Judit. (2004)Ombudspersons and patients' rights representatives inHungary. InProtecting Patients' Rights. A comparative study of the ombudsman in healthcare Stephen Mackenny and Lars Fallberg (eds.) (Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press).
82. SASSE, Gwendolyn. (2008) The politics of EU conditionality: The norm of minority protection during and beyond EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 842-860.
83. SCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank, and SEDELMEIER, Ulrich. (2005) Introduction: Conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. In The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Frank Schimmelfennigand andUlrich Sedelmeier (eds.) (Ithaca, NY: CornellUniversity Press).
84. Schirrmacher, Thomas. (1998). Human Rights Threatened in Europe: Euthanasia-Abortion-Bioethics Convention. Lecture, First European ProLife Forum, Berlin. [Online]. Available: http://www.contra-mundum.org/schirrmacher/HumanRights.pdf.
85. SIMMONS, Beth A. (2000) International law and state behavior: Commitment and Compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94 (4), 819-835.
86. SLOVAK GOVERNMENT. (1997) Document 684, 1 April. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrsr.sk/nrdk/Download.aspx?MasterID=129364.
87. SLOVAK GOVERNMENT. (1998) Government Justification of Support for the Biomedicine Convention. [Online]. Available: http://www.vlada.gov.sk/vlada/zasadnutia/1998/sk komunike 19980224 155.shtml.
88. SLOVAK PARLIAMENT. (1997) Stenographic record of 33rd session, 3 October. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrsr.sk/nrdk/Download.aspx?MasterID=65887.
89. SLOVAK PARLIAMENT. (1998) Stenogram of 52nd session, 5 August. [Online]. Available: http:// www.nrsr.sk/nrdk/Download.aspx?MasterID=65941.
90. SLOVENE GOVERNMENT. (1998) Obrazlǒzitev. [Online]. Available: http://www.dz-rs.si/index. php?id=101&st=a&vt=26&epa=0526&mandate=2&unid=PZ2%7CC12563A400339077C125 668D0026CE05&exp=PZ2C12563A400339077C12566340030A1C2#listrowPZ2C12563A 400339077C12566340030A1C2.
91. SLOVENE PARLIAMENT. (1998). Stenographic Record of Debate of 24 September. [Online].Available: http://www.dz-rs.si/index.php?id=97&mandate=-1&o=2090&sb=1&sd=1&unid=SZA2 &987CB5E1EEF612CBC125668E00464B20&ct=s&cs=1&showdoc=1.
92. SOKALSKA, Maria. (2006) Recent developments in health law in Poland: New Law on the removal, storage and transplantation of cells, tissues and organs. European Journal of Health Law, 13(2), 115-122.
93. STONE, Diane. (2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the "transnationalization" of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545-566.
94. SZALAY, Tomas. (2008) Naziadost rodiny nebudeme informova [At the request of the family we will not inform you.]. Sme, 2 July.
95. Vidin S Juris. (2001) Parliamentary Debate of 2 February. [Online]. Available: http://www.saeima. lv/steno/2001/st2501.html.
96. WHO/EURO. (1994) A Declaration on the Promotion of Patients' Rights in Europe, Amsterdam. [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/genomics/public/eu declaration1994.pdf.
97. WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. (2005) World Medical Association Declaration on the Rights of the Patient, the 34th World Medical Assembly, Lisbon, Portugal, September/October 1981 (as amended by the 47th WMA General Assembly, Bali, Indonesia, September 1995, with editorial revisions at the 171st Council Session, Santiago, Chile, October 2005). [Online]. Available: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/l4.htm [30 September 2010].
98. Zelichowski, Mariusz. (2007) Pobieranie koḿorek macierzystych z embriońow ludzkich-analiza prawna [Taking Stem Cells from Human Embryos-A Legal Analysis]. Medycyna Praktyczna. [Online]. Available: http://www.mp.pl/artykuly/?aid=26251 [16 January 2010].