Predicting aggressive behavior in children with the help of measures of implicit and explicit aggression

International Journal of Behavioral Development

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 352-357

  Grumm, Mandy ^a,b   Hein, Sascha ^a,b   Fingerle, Michael ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA)   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aggressive behavior; Competitive computer game; Explicit aggression; Implicit aggression; Implicit Association Test

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 79960279339     PISSN: 01650254     EISSN: 14640651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165025411405955     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/ 4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997). External validity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19-41. (Pubitemid 127547052)
3. Anderson, C. A., & Murphy, C. R. (2003). Violent video games and aggressive behavior in young women. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 423-429. (Pubitemid 38628671)
4. Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist. (1998). Fragebogen fur Jugendliche; deutsche Bearbeitung der Youth Self-Report Form der Child Behavior Checklist (YSR). Einführung und Anleitung zur Handauswertung (2. Auflage mit deutschen Normen, bearbeitet von M. Döpfner, J. Plück, S. Bölte, K. Lenz, P. Melchers, & K. Heim) [Questionnaire for adolescents, German version of the Youth Self Report Form (YSR). Introduction and manual (2nd ed. with German norms by M. Döpfner, J. Plück, S. Bölte, K. Lenz, P. Melchers, & K. Heim)]. Cologne, Germany: Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und amiliendiagnostik (KJFD).
5. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie [Social psychology]. Munich, Germany: Pearson Stadium.
6. Baron R. A. Richardson, D. (1994). Human aggression. New York, NY: Plenum.
7. Beal, D. J., O'Neal, E. C, Ong, J., & Ruscher, J. B. (2000). The ways and means of interracial aggression: Modern racists' use of covert retaliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1225-1238.
8. Berkowitz, L. (2008). On the consideration of automatic as well as controlled psychological processes in aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 117-129.
9. Blümke, M., & Zumbach, J. (2007). Implicit and explicit measures in analyzing aggression of computer gamers. In G. Steffgen & M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Emotions and aggressive behavior (pp. 3-56). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
10. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108, 273-279. (Pubitemid 33604134)
11. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. (Pubitemid 37417496)
13. Giancola, P. R., & Chermack, S. T. (1998). Construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to Tedeschi and Quigley (1996). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 237-253. (Pubitemid 28354399)
14. Giancola, P. R., & Parrott, D. J. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of the Taylor aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 214-229.
15. Gollwitzer, M., Banse, R., Eisenbach, K, & Naumann, A. (2007). Effectiveness of the Vienna social competence training on explicit and implicit aggression. Evidence from an aggressiveness-IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 150-156.
16. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
17. Greenwald, A. G, & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
18. Greenwald, A. G, McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. (Pubitemid 128658112)
19. Greenwald, A. G, Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. (Pubitemid 37394958)
20. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385. (Pubitemid 41422572)
21. Holtappels, H. G., Heitmeyer, W., Melzer, W., & Tillmann, K.-J. (Eds.). (2009). Forschung über Gewalt an Schulen. Erscheinungsformen und Ursachen, Konzepte und Prdvention [Research on violence at school. Form, cause, concepts and prevention]. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.
22. Lee, K.-H., Baillargeon, R. H., Vermunt, J. K., Wu, H.-X., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Age differences in the prevalence of physical aggression among 5-11-year-old Canadian boys and girls. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 26-37'.
23. Perugini, M., O'Gorman, R., & Prestwich, A. (2007). An ontological test of the IAT: Self-activation can increase predictive validity. Experimental Psychology, 54, 134-147.
24. Phillipps, N. C, & Lochman, J. E. (2003). Experimentally manipulated change in children's proactive and reactive aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 215-227.
25. Richetin, J., & Richardson, D. S. (2008). Automatic processes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 423-430.
26. Richetin, J., Richardson, D. S., & Mason, G. D. (2010). Predictive validity of IAT aggressiveness in the context of provocation. Social Psychology, 41, 27-34.
27. Ritter, D., & Eslea, M. (2005). Hot sauce, toy guns, and graffiti: A critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 407-419. (Pubitemid 41634500)
28. Rocha, R. F., & Rogers, R. W. (1976). Ares and Babbitt in the classroom: Effects of competition and reward on children's aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 588-593.
29. Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 80-83.
30. Scheithauer, H. (2003). Aggressives Verhalten von Jungen und Mädchen [Aggressive behavior in boys and girls]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
31. Stadler, C, Rohrmann, S., Steuber, S., & Poustka, F. (2006). Effects of provocation on emotions and aggression in children. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 117-124.
32. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247. (Pubitemid 39288823)
33. Suris, A., Lind, L., Emmetta, G., Bormanc, P. D., Kashner, M., & Barratt, E. S. (2004). Measures of aggressive behavior: Overview of clinical andresearch instruments. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 165-227. (Pubitemid 38201608)
34. Todorov, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2002). Automatic sources of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 53-68. (Pubitemid 34002999)
35. Uhlmann, E., & Swanson, J. (2004). Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 41-52. (Pubitemid 38228504)
36. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.