A model for earthquake risk management based on the life-cycle performance of structures

Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-278

  Tesfamariama, Solomon ^a   Sanchez Silvab, Mauricio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Cost; Fragility; Irregularities; Life cycle; Reliability; Structures

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; COSTS; EARTHQUAKES; FUZZY SET THEORY; LIFE CYCLE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RELIABILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

BUILDING PERFORMANCE; DIFFERENT DAMAGES; FRAGILITY; IRREGULARITIES; LIFE CYCLE COSTS (LCC); LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC HAZARDS; VANCOUVER , CANADA;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 79960272705     PISSN: 10286608     EISSN: 10290249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10286608.2011.588329     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, J. and Halchuk, S., 2003. Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 national building code of Canada. Open-File 4459. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Geological Survey of Canada.
2. ATC, 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, California: Applied Technology Council, ATC-13 report.
3. ATC, 2002. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard: a handbook. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, (FEMA 154 report). Prepared by the Applied Technology Council.
4. Atkinson, G., 2004.An overview of developments in seismic hazard analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, 2-6 August, Vancouver, British Columbia, keynote paper (5001).
5. Bartlett, F.M., Hong, H.P., and Zhou, W., 2003. Load factor calibration for NBCC 2004: statistics of loads and load effects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30 (2), 429-439.
6. Blockley, D.I., 1995. Engineering safety. London: McGraw Hill.
7. Blockley, D.I. and Godfrey, P.S., 2000. Doing it differently. London: Thomas Telford.
8. Ellingwood, B.R., Celik, O.C., and Kinali, K., 2007. Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid America. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36 (13), 1935-1952.
9. FEMA (Federal EmergencyManagement Agency), 1992. A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, vols. 1 and 2. FEMA 227 and 228.
10. FEMA, 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, HAZUS-MH MR1 Technical Manual.
11. FEMA-249, 1994. Assessment of the state-of-the-art earthquake loss estimation methodologies. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Earthquake hazards reduction series 70.
12. Frangopol, D.M., Kallen, M.-J., and Noortwijk, M., 2004. Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 6, 197-212.
13. Hadipriono, F.C. and Ross, T.J., 1991.A rule-based fuzzy logic deduction technique for damage assessment of protective structure. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 44 (3), 459-468.
14. Hong, H.P. and Goda, K., 2006. A comparison of seismic-hazard and risk deaggregation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96 (6), 2021-2039.
15. Klir, G.J. and Yuan, B., 1995. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
16. Mamdani, E.H., 1977. Application of fuzzy logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 26 (12), 1182-1191.
17. Miyasato, G.H., et al., 1986. Implementation of a knowledge based seismic risk evaluation system on microcomputers. Artificial Intelligence, 1 (1), 29-35.
18. Nathwani, J.S., Lind, N.C., and Pandey, M.D., 1997. Affordable safety by choice: the life quality method. Ontario, Canada: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo.
19. Rackwitz, R., Lentz, A., and Faber, M.H., 2005. Socio-economically sustainable civil engineering infrastructures by optimization. Structural Safety, 27, 187-229.
20. Rackwitz, R., 2000. Optimization - the basis of code making and reliability verification. Structural Safety, 22 (1), 27-60.
21. Ross, T.J., 2004. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. 2nd ed. UK: JohnWiley & Sons.
22. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A., 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures, 25 (10), 1241-1263.
23. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A., 2005. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Engineering Structures, 27 (3), 397-409.
24. Salvaneschi, P., Cadei, M., and Lazzari, M., 1997. A causal modelling framework for the simulation and explanation of the behaviour of structures. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 11 (3), 205-216.
25. Sánchez-Silva, M. and García, L., 2001. Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neural network. Earthquake Spectra, 17 (1), 89-112.
26. Sánchez-Silva, M. and Rackwitz, R., 2004. Implications of the high quality index in the design of optimum structures to withstand earthquakes. ASCE Journal of Structural engineering, 130 (6), 969-977.
27. Sánchez-Silva, M., Klutke, G.-A., and Rosowsky, D., 2011. Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Structural Safety, 33 (3), 206-217.
28. Shinozuka, M., et al., 2000. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126 (12), 1224-1231.
29. Tesfamariam, S. and Saatcioglu, M., 2008. Risk-based seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 24 (3), 795-821.
30. Tesfamariam, S. and Saatcioglu, M., 2010. Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using hierarchical fuzzy rule base modeling. Earthquake Spectra, 26 (1), 235-256.
31. Wen,Y.K., 2001. Minimum lifecycle cost design under multiple hazards. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73, 223-231.
32. Wen, Y.K., et al., 2003. Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering. MAE Center Project FD-2 Report, 12 February 2003.
33. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
34. Zadeh, L.A., 1973. Outline of a newapproach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEETransactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3 (1), 28-44.
35. Zadeh, L.A., 1994. Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Communication of the ACM, 37 (3), 77-84