Adaptation is automatic

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 503-510

  Samuel, Arthur G ^a   Kat, Donna ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AUTOMATISM; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032042096     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206870     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. CONNINE, C. M., & CLIFTON, C. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 291-299.
2. CUTLER, A., MEHLER, J., NORRIS, D., & SEGUI, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
3. CUTTING, J. E. (1976). Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: Inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. Psychological Review, 83, 114-140.
4. EIMAS, P. D., & CORBIT, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
5. EIMAS, P. D., HORNSTEIN, S. M., & PAYTON, P. (1990). Attention and the role of dual codes in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 160-180.
6. ELMAN, J. L., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 143-165.
7. FUJISAKI, H., & KAWASHIMA, T. (1970). Some experiments on speech perception and a model for the perceptual mechanism. Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, 29, 207-214.
8. KAT, D., & SAMUEL, A. G. (1984). More adaptation of speech by non-speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 512-525.
9. KLATT, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade-parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971-995.
10. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & WELSH, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
11. MASSARO, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
12. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1-44.
13. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
14. MCQUEEN, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 433-443.
15. MULLENNIX, J. W. (1986). Attentional limitations in the perception of speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
16. NORRIS, D. G. (1993). Bottom-up connectionist models of "interaction." In G. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 211-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. SAMUEL, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
18. SAMUEL, A. G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 452-499.
19. SAMUEL, A. G. (1988). Central and peripheral representation of whispered and voiced speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 379-388.
20. SAMUEL, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28-51.
21. SAMUEL, A. G. (1997). Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97-127.
22. SAMUEL, A. G., & KAT, D. (1996). Early levels of analysis of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 676-694.
23. SAMUEL, A. G., & NEWPORT, E. L. (1979). Adaptation of speech and non-speech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 563-578.
24. SAWUSCH, J. (1977). Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 738-750.
25. SAWUSCH, J. (1986). Auditory and phonetic coding of speech. In E. Schwab & H. Nusbaum (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines (pp. 51-88). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26. SUSSMAN, J. E. (1993). Focused attention during selective adaptation along a place of articulation continuum. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 488-498.
27. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
28. WARREN, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392-393.
29. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.