A formal theory of the selfish gene

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1801-1813

  Gardner, Andy ^a,b   Welch, J J ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b BALLIOL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Epistasis; Formal Darwinism; Gene as maximizing agent; Inclusive fitness; Optimization program

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALTRUISM; ANALOG MODEL; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; NATURAL SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 79960269947     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02310.x     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Bateson, P.P.G. 1978. Book review: The selfish gene by Richard Dawkins. Anim. Behav. 26: 316-318.
2. Bateson, P.P.G. 2006. The nest's tale. A reply to Richard Dawkins. Biol. Philos. 21: 553-558.
3. Burt, A. & Trivers, R. 2006. Genes in Conflict. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Charlesworth, B. 1990. Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution 44: 520-538.
5. Charlesworth, B. 2006. Conflicts of interest. Curr. Biol. 16: R1009-R1011.
6. Crow, J.F. 2008. Maintaining evolvability. J. Genet. 87: 349-353.
7. Daly, M. 1980. Contentious genes: a commentary on The selfish gene by Richard Dawkins. J. Soc. Biol. Struct. 3: 77-81.
8. Darwin, C.R. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London, UK.
9. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
10. Dawkins, R. 1978. Replicator selection and the extended phenotype. Z. Tierpsychol. 47: 61-76.
11. Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Dennett, D.C. 1989. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Dover, G. 2000. Anti-Dawkins. In: Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology (H. Rose & S. Rose, eds), pp. 55-77. Harmony Books, New York, NY.
14. Ewens, W.J. 2011. What is the gene trying to do? Br. J. Philos. Sci. 62: 155-176.
15. Fisher, R.A. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52: 399-433.
16. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
17. Fisher, R.A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11: 53-63.
18. Frank, S.A. 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Gardner, A. 2009. Adaptation as organism design. Biol. Lett. 5: 861-864.
20. Gardner, A. & Grafen, A. 2009. Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 659-671.
21. Gardner, A., West, S.A. & Wild, G. 2011. The genetical theory of kin selection. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1020-1043.
22. Gershenson, S. 1928. A new sex-ratio abnormality in Drosophila obscura. Genetics 13: 488-507.
23. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Gould, S.J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Grafen, A. 2000. Developments of the Price equation and natural selection under uncertainty. Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 1223-1227.
26. Grafen, A. 2002. A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimization program. J. Theor. Biol. 217: 75-91.
27. Grafen, A. 2003. Fisher the evolutionary biologist. J. R. Stat. Soc. D 52: 319-329.
28. Grafen, A. 2006a. Optimization of inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 238: 541-563.
29. Grafen, A. 2006b. A theory of Fisher's reproductive value. J. Math. Biol. 53: 15-60.
30. Grafen, A. 2007. The formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1243-1254.
31. Grafen, A. 2008. The simplest formal argument for fitness optimisation. J. Genet. 87: 421-433.
32. Grafen, A. 2009. Formalizing Darwinism and inclusive fitness theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364: 3135-3141.
33. Haig, D. 1997. The social gene. In: Behavioural Ecology, 4th edn (J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies, eds), pp. 284-304. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK.
34. Hamilton, W.D. 1963. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am. Nat. 97: 354-356.
35. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-52.
36. Hamilton, W.D. 1970. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228: 1218-1220.
37. Hamilton, W.D. 1972. Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 193-232.
38. Hamilton, W.D. 1996. Narrow Roads of Gene land I: Evolution of Social Behaviour. W.H. Freeman, Oxford, UK.
39. Hammerstein, P. & Hagen, E.H. 2006. Broken cogs or strategic agents? Science 312: 530.
40. Hampe, M. & Morgan, S.R. 1988. Two consequences of Richard Dawkins' view of genes and organisms. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 19: 119-138.
41. Hull, D.L. 2001. Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
42. Hurst, L.D., Atlan, A. & Bengtsson, B.O. 1996. Genetic conflicts. Q. Rev. Biol. 71: 317-364.
43. Israels, A.Z. 1987. Path analysis for mixed qualitative and quantitative variables. Qual. Quant. 21: 91-102.
44. Kitcher, P., Sterelny, K. & Waters, C.K. 1990. The illusory riches of Sober's monism. J. Philos. 87: 158-161.
45. Langley, C.H. 1977. A little Darwinism. Bioscience 27: 692.
46. Leigh, E. 1971. Adaptation and Diversity. Cooper, San Francisco, CA.
47. Lenormand, T., Roze, D. & Rousset, F. 2009. Stochasticity in evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 157-165.
48. Lewontin, R.C. 1977. Caricature of Darwinism. Nature 266: 283-284.
49. Lloyd, E.A. 2001. Different questions: levels and units of selection. In: Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives (R.S. Singh, C.B. Krimbas, D.B. Paul & J. Beatty, eds), pp. 267-291. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
50. Lloyd, E.A. 2005. Why the gene will not return. Philos. Sci. 72: 287-310.
51. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
52. Maynard Smith, J. 1987. How to model evolution. In: The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality (J. Dupré, ed.), pp. 119-132. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Mayr, E. 1983. How to carry out the adaptationist program? Am. Nat. 121: 324-334.
54. Mehdiabadi, N.J., Reeve, H.K. & Mueller, U.G. 2002. Queens versus workers: sex-ratio conflict in eusocial Hymenoptera. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 88-92.
55. Midgley, M. 1979. Gene juggling. Philosophy 54: 439-458.
56. Midgley, M. 1983. Selfish genes and social Darwinism. Philosophy 58: 365-377.
57. Nagylaki, T. 1991. Error bounds for the fundamental and secondary theorems of natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88: 2402-2406.
58. Nagylaki, T. 1993. The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134: 627-647.
59. von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
60. Noble, D. 2011. Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis, and Selfish Genes: are they of use in physiology? J. Physiol. 589: 1007-1015.
61. Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
62. Orlove, M.J. & Wood, C.L. 1978. Coefficients of relationship and coefficients of relatedness in kin selection: a covariance form for the RHO formula. J. Theor. Biol. 73: 679-686.
63. Paley, W. 1802. Natural Theology. Wilks & Taylor, London, UK.
64. Parker, G.A. & Maynard Smith, J. 1990. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature 348: 27-33.
65. Price, G.R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227: 520-521.
66. Price, G.R. 1972. Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann. Hum. Genet. 35: 485-490.
67. Queller, D.C. 1992. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 46: 376-380.
68. Robertson, A. 1966. A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle. Anim. Product. 8: 95-108.
69. Robertson, A. 1968. The spectrum of genetic variation. In: Population Biology and Evolution (R.C. Lewontin, ed.), pp. 5-16. Syracuse University Press, Princeton, NJ.
70. Sober, E. & Lewontin, R.C. 1982. Artifact, cause and genic selection. Philos. Sci. 47: 157-180.
71. Stent, G.S. 1977. You can take the ethics out of altruism but you can't take the altruism out of ethics. Hastings Cent. Rep. 7: 33-36.
72. Sterelny, K. & Kitcher, P. 1988. The return of the gene. J. Philos. 85: 339-361.
73. Wade, M.J. 1978. The selfish gene. Evolution 32: 220-221.
74. West, S.A. 2009. Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
75. West, S.A. & Gardner, A. 2010. Altruism, spite and greenbeards. Science 327: 1341-1344.
76. West, S.A., Griffin, A.S. & Gardner, A. 2007. Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 415-432.
77. West, S.A., El Mouden, C. & Gardner, A. In press. 16 common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav., doi:.
78. Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
79. Williams, G.C. 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels & Challenges. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
80. Wright, S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 5: 161-215.