The experiences and outcomes of domestic and international students at four Canadian universities

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 215-230

  Paul Grayson, J ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

College impact model; Domestic students; International students; Student experiences; University outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960233826     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360802183788     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antonio, M. J. (1989). The process of adjustment among sojourning foreign and Canadian students. (Unpublished MA, University of Windsor, 1989).
2. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
3. Bartlett, K. (2002). National report on international students in Canada 2000/2001. Ottawa: The Canadian Bureau for International Education.
4. Benjamin, M. (1990). Freshman daily experiences: Implications for policy, research and theory. Guelph: University of Guelph Student Environment Group.
5. Berry, J.W., & Kostovcik, N. (1983). Psychological adaptation of Malaysian students in Canada. Paper presented at the Third Asian Regional Conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.
6. Bohm, A., Fallari, M., Hewett, A., Jones, S., Kemp, N., Meares, D., et al. (2004). Vision 2020: Forecasting international student mobility. A UK perspective. Manchester: British Council, Education and Training Group.
7. Chataway, C.J., & Berry, J.W. (1989). Acculturation experiences, appraisal, coping and adaptation: A comparison of Hong Kong Chinese, French, and English students in Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21, 295-309.
8. Church, A.T. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91(May), 540-572.
9. Crawford, S.D., Couper, M.P., & Lamias, M.J. (2001). Web surveys: Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 146-162.
10. Dey, E.L. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighting adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38(2), 215-227.
11. Feldman, K.A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students' view. Research in Higher Education, 5(3), 243-248.
12. Finsterbusch, K. (Ed.). (1992). Sociology 92/93. Guilford, CT: Duschkin Publishing Group.
13. Grayson, J.P. (1997). Place of residence, student involvement, and first Year Marks. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 27(1), 1-23.
14. Hutchinson, J., Tollefson, N., & Wigington, H. (1987). Response bias in college freshman's response to mail surveys. Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 99-106.
15. Klineberg, O., & Hull, W.F. (1979). At a foreign university: An international study of adaptation and coping. New York: Praeger.
16. Marsh, H., & Dunkin, M.J. (1992). Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 8, 143-233.
17. Mason, P.M., Steagall, J.W., & Fabritius, M.M. (1995). Student evaluations of faculty: A new procedure for using aggregate measures of performance. Economics of Education Review, 14(4), 403-416.
18. Mickle, K. (1985). The adaptation of Hong Kong students to Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto-York University Joint Center on Modern East Asia.
19. National Center for Education Statistics. [NCES]. (2002). National postsecondary student aid study 1999-2000 (Npsas:2000), Cati nonresponse bias analysis report (No. 2002-03). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
20. National Survey of Student Engagement. [NSSE]. (2003). The college student report: 2003 overview. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana.
21. Pascarella, E., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L., & Terenzini, P. (1996). Influence on students' openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 174-195.
22. Pidgeon, M., & Andres, L. (2005). The first-year experiences of international and domestic students at Canadian universities. Vancouver: Department of Educational Studies, University of British Columbia.
23. Rice, R.E., Stewart, L.P., & Hujber, M. (2000). Extending the domain of instructional effectiveness assessment in student evaluations of communication courses. Communication Education, 49(3), 253-266.
24. Rohrlich, B.F. (1991). Host country and re-entry adjustment of student sojourners. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15(2), 163-182.
25. Savage, C. (2005). The national report on international students in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Bureau for International Students.
26. Sax, L.J., Gilmartin, S.K., & Bryant, A.N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in Web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432.
27. Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 23-39.
28. Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Yaeger, P.M., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1-22.
29. Terenzini, P., & Wright, T.M. (1987). Influences on students' academic growth during fours years of college. Research in Higher Education, 26(2), 161-179.
30. Uehara, A., & Hicks, J. (1989). Institutional responses to socio-cultural adjustment: Problems of foreign students in Japan. In K. Ebuchi (Ed.), Foreign students and internationalization of higher education. Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.
31. Walker, J.L. (1999). Canada first: The 1999 survey of international students. Ottawa: The Canadian Bureau for International Education.
32. Zhao, C., Kuh, G., & Carini, R. (2005). A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 209-231.