Camera talk: Making the camera a partial participant

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 839-848

  Lamberty, K K ^a   Kolodner, Janet L ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Data collection method; Educational software; Learning through design; Reflection; Video data

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; INFORMATION THEORY;

CHILDREN; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE; LEARNING THROUGH DESIGN; VIDEO DATA;

CAMERAS;

EID: 79960217260     PISSN: 02749696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of Viewing Children's Thinking: A Digital Ethnographer's Journey. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and Teaching With Understanding. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. D. A. Grouws. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company: 65-97.
4. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct Manipulation Interfaces. In Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W. (eds.), User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 87-124.
5. Lamberty, K. K. and Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Exploring digital quilt design using manipulatives as a math learning tool. In Bell, P., Stevens, R., and Satwicz, T., editors, Keeping Learning Complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), pp. 552-553, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Lamberty, K. K. & Kolodner, J. L. (2004). Towards a New Kind of Computational Manipulative: Children Learning Math and Designing Quilts with Manipulatives That Afford Both. Proc. IDC 2004, 143-144.
7. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Mishra, P. and Hershey, K. A. (2004). Human-computer etiquette: managing expectations with intentional agents: Etiquette and the design of educational technology. Communications of the ACM, 47(4).
9. Roschelle, J. (2000). Choosing and Using Video Equipment for Data Collection. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. A.E. Kelly and R.A. Lesh. Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 761-776.
10. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design For Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. van Kesteren, I. E. H., Bekker, M.M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., and Lloyd, P.A. (2003). Assessing Usability Evaluation Methods On Their Effectiveness To Elicit Verbal Comments From Children Subjects. Proc. IDC 2003, 41-49.
12. Wildman, D. (1995). Getting the Most from Paired-User Testing. Interactions. July, 1995.