Spatial constraints on social cognition

Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 159-164

  Maass, Anne ^a   Suitner, Caterina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960209178     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000059     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28. (Pubitemid 30433926)
2. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right-and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 351-367.
3. Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2010). Can mirror-reading reverse the flow of time? In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1342-1347). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
4. Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child's mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34, 387-405.
5. Chokron, S., Kazandjian, S., & De Agostini, M. (in press). Cultural and biological interaction in visuospatial organization. In T. Schubert & A. Maass (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 291-311). Berlin: De Gruyter.
6. Crawford, L. E., Margolies, S. M., Drake, J. T., & Murphy, M. E. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1153-1169. (Pubitemid 44803783)
7. Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
8. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15, 243-247. (Pubitemid 38535742)
10. Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2005). The metaphorical representation of affect. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 239-257. (Pubitemid 41249573)
11. Schnall, S., & Clore, G. L. (2004). Emergent meaning in affective space: Congruent conceptual relations and spatial relations produce positive evaluations. In K. Forbus, D. Genter, & T. Reiger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1209-1214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1-21. (Pubitemid 41168523)
13. Schubert, T. W., & Maass, A. (Eds.). (in press). Spatial dimensions of social thought. Berlin: De Gruyter.
14. Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2008). Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuro-scientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Suitner, C., Koch, S. C., Bachmeier, K., & Maass, A. (in press). Dynamic embodiment and its functional role: a body feedback perspective. In S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs, & C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor, and movement. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
16. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.