Student mobility and its implications for schools' adequate yearly progress

Journal of Negro Education

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 12-21

  Thompson, Sharon M ^a   Meyers, Joel ^a   Chris Oshima, T ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AYP; NCLB; School mobility; School poverty; School size

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960205892     PISSN: 00222984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. (2003). The effects of high stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60, 32-37.
2. Audette, R., & Algozzine, R. (2000). Within district transfers and student achievement: Moving ahead by staying in one place. Special Services in the Schools, 16, 73-81.
3. Chaika, G. (1999). Student mobility: Helping children cope with a moving experience. Education World, Retrieved from http://www.educationworld.com/a- curr/curr134.shtml.
4. Engec, N. (2006). Relationship between mobility and student performance and behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 167-178.
5. Heck, R. (2006). Assessing school achievement progress: Comparing alternative approaches. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 667-699.
6. Heinlein, M. L., & Shinn, M. (2000). School mobility and student achievement in an urban setting. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 349-357.
7. Kerbow, D. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 1, 147-169.
8. Kerbow, D., Azcoitia, C., & Buell, B. (2003). Student mobility and local improvement in Chicago. The Journal of Negro Education, 72, 158-164.
9. Ligons, G., & Paredes, V. (1992, April). Student mobility rate: A moving target. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
10. Mehana, M., & Reynolds, A. J. (2004). School mobility and achievement: A meta-analysis. Children & Youth Services Review, 26, 93-119. (Pubitemid 38254293)
11. Minneapolis Family Housing Fund. (1998). Kids mobility project. Minneapolis, MN: Author. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §20, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
12. Offenberg, R. M. (2004). Inferring adequate yearly progress of schools from student achievement in highly mobile communities. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 9, 337-355.
13. Owens, A., & Sunderman, G. L. (2006, October). School accountability under NCLB: Aid or obstacle for measuring racial equity. [Policy Brief]. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
14. Paris, S. G., & Urdan, T. (2000). Policies and practices of high-stakes testing that influence teachers and schools. Issues in Education, 6, 83-107.
15. Pribesh, S., & Downey, D. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance? Demography, 36, 521-534.
16. Ream, R. K. (2005). Toward understanding how social capital mediates the impact of mobility on Mexican American Achievement. Social Forces, 84, 201-224.
17. Rhodes, V. (2005). Kids on the move: The effects of student mobility on NCLB school accountability ratings. Penn GSE Perspectives in Urban Education, 3 (online).
18. Rumberger, R. W. (2003). The causes and consequences of student mobility The Journal of Negro Education, 72, 6-21.
19. Rumberger, R. W., & Larson, K. A. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107, 1-35.
20. Rumberger, R. W., Larson, K. A., Ream, R. K., & Palardy, G. J. (1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education.
21. Temple, J., & Reynolds, A. J. (1999). School mobility and achievement: Longitudinal findings from an urban cohort. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 355-377.
22. U. S. Department of Education. (2006). Data on the percentages of economically disadvantaged students achieving at proficient levels or above on state assessments. Program assessment rating tool (PART) program results/accountability data, section 4, number 1. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/expectmore/titleiparta.doc
23. U. S. Government Accounting Office. (1994). Elementary school children: Many change schools frequently, harming their education. (GAO/HEHS Publication No. 94-95). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
24. U. S. Government Accounting Office. (2007). No Child Left Behind Act: Education should clarify guidance and address potential compliance issues for schools in corrective action and restructuring status. (GAO-07-1035). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
25. Wright, D. (1999). Student mobility: A negligible and confounded influence on student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 347-354.
26. Yeh, S. S. (2005). Limiting the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1-23.