Characterization of the porosity of human dental enamel and shear bond strength in vitro after variable etch times: Initial findings using the BET Method

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 707-715

  Nguyen, Trang T ^a   Miller, Arthur ^b   Orellana, Maria F ^b  

^a Orange County   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental enamel; Etching; Porosity; Shear strength

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; POROSITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADSORPTION; CHILD; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ENAMEL PERMEABILITY; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POROSITY; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79960190572     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/083010-506.1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34: 849-853.
2. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2000;27: 143-148.
3. Mahoney E, Ismail FS, Kilpatrick N, Swain M. Mechanical properties across hypomineralized/hypoplastic enamel of first permanent molar teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112: 497-502. (Pubitemid 39627030)
4. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 184-189. (Pubitemid 33651195)
5. Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-enamel bond strength. Br Dent J. 2002;192: 463-468.
6. Hobson RS, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Booth TA. Acid-etch patterns on the buccal surface of human permanent teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47: 407-412. (Pubitemid 34601682)
7. Oliver RG. The effects of differing etch times on the etch pattern on enamel of unerupted and erupted human teeth examined using the scanning electron microscope. Br J Orthod. 1987;14: 105-107.
8. Gardner A, Hobson R. Variations in acid-etch patterns with different acids and etch times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120: 64-67. (Pubitemid 33628934)
9. Dibdin GH. The internal surface and pore structure of enamel. J Dent Res. 1969;48: 771-776.
10. Orellana MF, Nelson AE, Carey JP, Heo G, Boychuk DG, Major PW. Surface analysis of etched molar enamel by gas adsorption. J Dent Res. 2008;87: 532-536.
11. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gasses in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc. 1938;60: 309-319.
12. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RW, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface-area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem. 1985;57: 603-619.
13. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. The pore structure of human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18: 1063-1068.
14. Read MJ, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98: 259-262.
15. Millett DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right on). Eur J Orthod. 1994;16: 203-211.
16. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 1998;68: 351-356. (Pubitemid 128543202)
17. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater. 1996;12: 109-115.
18. Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976;3: 91-95.
19. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2: 171-178.
20. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of reduced acid concentration and etching time on bond strength and enamel morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1987;21: 395-398.
21. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1985;19: 36-38.
22. Johnston CD, Hussey DL, Burden DJ. The effect of etch duration on the microstructure of molar enamel: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109: 531- 534.
23. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Rugg-Gunn AJ. The relationship between acid-etch patterns and bond survival in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121: 502-509. (Pubitemid 40433051)
24. Ceppi E, Dall'Oca S, Rimondini L, Pilloni A, Polimeni A. Cementoenamel junction of deciduous teeth: SEM-morphology. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2006;7: 131-134.
25. Misra DN, Bowen RL, Mattamal GJ. Surface area of dental enamel, bone, and hydroxyapatite: chemisorption from solution. Calcif Tissue Res. 1978;26: 139-142.
26. Fridell RA, Lussi A, Crenshaw MA, Bawden JW. The in vitro uptake of fluoride by secretory and maturation stage bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1988;67: 487-490.
27. Beech DR, Jalaly T. Bonding of polymers to enamel: influence of deposits formed during etching, etching time and period of water immersion. J Dent Res. 1980;59: 1156-1162. (Pubitemid 10010446)
28. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999;27: 523-530.
29. Teaford MSM, Ferguson WJ. Development, Function and Evolution of the Teeth. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
30. Poole DF, Brooks AW. The arrangement of crystallites in enamel prisms. Arch Oral Biol. 1961;5: 14-26.
31. Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets-a comparative study of adhesives. Br J Orthod. 1976;3: 143-146.