The relationship between acid-etch patterns and bond survival in vivo

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 502-509

  Hobson, Ross S ^a   McCabe, John F ^a   Rugg Gunn, Andrew J ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPOXIDE; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RIGHT-ON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE; HISTOMETRY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RIGHT ON;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0036582668     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.122239     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Zachrisson BJ. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173-89.
2. Read MJ, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:259-62.
3. Millett DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right On). Eur J Orthod 1994;16:203-11.
4. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998;68:351-6.
5. Barry GR. A clinical investigation of the effects of omission of pumice prophylaxis on band and bond failure. Br J Orthod 1995;22:245-8.
6. Guba CJ, Cochran MA, Swartz ML. The effects of varied etching time and etching solution viscosity on bond strength and enamel morphology. Oper Dent 1994;19:146-53.
7. Carstensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod 1986;89:70-2.
8. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in-vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991;18:125-30.
9. Robinson C, Weatherell JA, Hallsworth AS. Variation in composition of dental enamel within thin ground tooth sections. Caries Res 1971;5:44-57.
10. Li J, Nakagaki H, Tsuboi S, Kato S, Huang S, Mukai M, et al. Fluoride profiles in different surfaces of human permanent molar enamel from a naturally fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39:727-31.
11. Gwinnett AJ. Human prismless enamel and its influence on sealant penetration. Arch Oral Biol 1973;18:441-4.
12. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1982;27:383-92.
13. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparison of in-vitro acid etched buccal surfaces of different tooth types [abstract]. J Dent Res 1996;75:1158.
14. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. Variability in quality and quantity of etch pattern on different tooth types [abstract]. J Dent Res 1997;76:1029.
15. Beynon AD. Replication technique for studying microstructure in fossil enamel. Scanning Microsc 1987;1:663-9.
16. Galil KA, Wright GZ. Effects of various acids on the buccal surface of human permanent teeth: a study using scanning electron microscopy. Pediatr Dent 1979;1:155-9.
17. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod 2000;27:143-8.
18. Anderson JM. Histometry. In: Bancroft JD, Stevens A, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1982.
19. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. In-vivo acid etch patterns on human teeth [abstract]. J Dent Res 2000;79:304.
20. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: a review of clinical failure rate. J Dent 1983;11:231-6.
21. Retief DH, Dreyer CJ, Gavron G. The direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth by means of an epoxy resin adhesive. Am J Orthod 1970;58:21-40.
22. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Implications of the failure rates of bonded brackets and eyelets: a clinical study. Am J Orthod 1984;86:403-6.
23. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:476-83.
24. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:127-30.
25. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1995;22:319-23.
26. Trimpeneers EM, Verbeeck RM, Dermaut ER, Moors MG. Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:89-95.
27. Valiathan A, Krishnan VK. Development and clinical evaluation of Chitra visible light cure composite. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997;33:447-52.
28. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998;25:283-7.
29. Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:62-78.
30. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:348-51.
31. Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. The effect of timing of archwire placement on in vivo bond failure. Br J Orthod 1997;24: 243-5.
32. Nattrass C, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. An investigation into the placement of force delivery systems and the initial forces applied by clinicians during space closure. Br J Orthod 1997;24:127-31.
33. Munksgaard EC, Freund M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:261-7.
34. Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:132-41.
35. Mizrahi E, Smith DC. Direct cementation of orthodontic brackets to dental enamel: an investigation using a zinc polycarboxylate cement. Br Dent J 1969;127:371-5.
36. Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. Use of an adhesive resin for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:27-34.
37. Sonis AL. Comparison of a light-cured adhesive with an autopolymerizing bonding system. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:730-2.
38. Murray JJ, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Jenkins GN. Fluorides in caries prevention. London: Wright; 1991.
39. Crotty T. A quantitative study of enamel acid etch patterns on surfaces used for acid bridge retention [thesis]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University; 1999.
40. Hobson RS. Factors affecting the resin to composite bond in orthodontics [thesis]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University; 2000.
41. Gorelick L. Bonding metal brackets with a self-polymerizing sealant-composite: a 12-month assessment. Am J Orthod 1977; 71:542-53.
42. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod 1978;74:197-206.
43. Bates D, Retief DH, Jamison HC, Denys FR. Effects of acid etch parameters on enamel topography and composite resin - enamel bond strength. Pediatr Dent 1982;4:106-10.
44. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J Clin Orthod 1985;19:36-8.
45. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of reduced acid concentration and etching time on bond strength and enamel morphology. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:395-8.
46. Zidan O, Hill G. Phosphoric acid concentration: enamel surface loss and bonding strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:388-92
47. Bhad WA, Hazarey PV. Scanning electron microscopic study and shear bond strength measurement with 5% and 37% phosphoric acid. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:410-4.
48. Hotta K, Mogi M, Miura F, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 4-MET on bond strength and penetration of monomers into enamel. Dent Mater 1992;8:173-5.
49. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence; 1998.
50. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denys ER, Sadowsky PL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:485-92.
51. Legier LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on enamel depth of etch: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:154-60.
52. Retief DH, Busscher HJ, de Boer P, Jongebloed WL, Arends J. A laboratory evaluation of three etching solutions. Dent Mater 1986;2:202-6.