I-GEL™ vs. auraonce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients

Biomedical Papers

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-164

  Donaldson, William ^a   Abraham, Alexander ^a   Deighan, Mairead ^b   Michalek, Pavel ^a,c  

^a ANTRIM AREA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Airway pressure; Intermittent positive pressure ventilation; Laryngeal mask; Postoperative complications

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960179974     PISSN: 12138118     EISSN: 18047521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2011.023     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros AM. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1137-9.
2. Gatward JJ, Cook ™, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, Kelly F. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel™ airway in one hundred non-paralyzed patients. Anaesthesia 2008;63:1124-30.
3. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:801-5.
4. Ng SY, Teoh WHL, Lim Y, Cheong VG. Comparison of the AMBU Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Classic in anaesthetized, spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008;35:57-62.
5. Shariffuddin II, Wang CY. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce™ Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2008;63:82-5.
6. Hagberg CA, Jensen FS, Genzwuerker HV, Krivosic-Horber R, Schmitz BU, Hinkelbein J, Contzen M, Menu H, Bourzoufi K. A multicenter study of the Ambu laryngeal mask in nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1862-6.
7. Adamus M, Koutna J, Gabrhelik T, Hubackova M, Janaskova E. Influence of gender on the onset and duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2007;151:301-5.
8. Adamus M, Belohlavek R, Koutna J, Vujcikova M, Janaskova E. Cisatracurium vs. rocuronium: a prospective, comparative, randomized study in adult patients under intravenous anaesthesia. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub.2006;150:333-8.
9. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:824-7.
10. Lopez AM, Valero R, Bovaira P, Pons M, Sala-Blanch X, Anglada T. A clinical evaluation of four disposable laryngeal masks in adult patients. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:514-20.
11. Sudhir G, Redfern D, Hall JE, Wilkes AR, Cann C. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask with the reusable LMA Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2007;62:719-22.
12. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, Renner J, Scholz J, Steinfath M, Tonner PH, Doerges V. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24:134-40.
13. Theiler LG, Kleine-Bruegenney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask Supreme and the i-gel™ in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009;111:55-62.
14. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gel™ with the LMA-Unique™ in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia 2009;64:1118-24.
15. Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Randomised crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetised, paralysed adults. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:882-5.
16. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The i-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesth Scand 2009;53:376-9.
17. Jackson KM, Cook ™. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007;62:388-93.
18. Michalek P, Donaldson WJ, Hinds JM. Tongue trauma associated with the I-gel supraglottic airway: a report of three cases. Anaesthesia 2009;64:692-3.
19. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:264-8.
20. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogush G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:135-9.
21. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1022-6.
22. Michalek P, Hodgkinson P, Donaldson W. Fibreoptic intubation through an I-gel supraglottic airway in two patients with predicted difficult airway and intellectual disability. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1501-4.
23. Donaldson W, Michalek P. The use of an i-gel supraglottic airway for the airway management of a patient with subglottic stenosis: a case report. Minerva Anestesiol 2010;76:369-72.
24. Keijzer C, Buitelaar DR, Efthymiou KM, Sramek M, ten Cate J, Ronday M, Stoppa T, Huitink JM, Schutte PF. A comparison of postoperative throat and neck complaints after the use of the i-gel and the La Premiere disposable laryngeal mask: a double blind, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1092-5.
25. Liew G, John B, Ahmed S. Aspiration recognition with an i-gel airway. Anaesthesia 2008;63:786.
26. Gibbison B, Cook TM, Seller C. Case series: protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:415-7.
27. Brimacombe J, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway - a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:297-305.
28. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000;85:262-6.
29. Hemmerling ™, Beaulieu P, Jacobi KE, Babin D, Schmidt J. Neuromuscular blockade does not change the incidence or severity of pharyngolaryngeal discomfort after LMA anesthesia. Can J Anesth 2004;51:728-32.
30. Sonoda S, Kugimiya T. Effects of cuff pressure on changes in airway morphology after use of the laryngeal mask airway. J Anesth 2003;17:133-5.