Querying semantic web data with SPARQL

Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 305-316

  Arenas, Marcelo ^a   Pérez, Jorge ^b  

^a PUC Chile ^*  (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Linked data; RDF; RDFs; Semantic web; SPARQL

Indexed keywords

DATABASE APPLICATIONS; DATABASE COMMUNITY; DATABASE PROBLEMS; DISTINCTIVE FEATURES; GRAPH STRUCTURES; LINKED DATUM; OPEN WORLD; QUERYING SEMANTICS; RDF; RDF DATA; RDF DATABASE; RDFS; RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES; SPARQL; STANDARD QUERY LANGUAGES; THEORETICAL STUDY; WEB DATA;

MODELS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 79960155354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1989284.1989312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. S. Abiteboul and V. Vianu. Queries and computation on the Web. Theor. Comput. Sci., 239(2):231-255, 2000.
2. F. Alkhateeb, J.-F. Baget, and J. Euzenat. Extending SPARQL with regular expression patterns (for querying RDF). J. Web Sem., 7(2):57-73, 2009.
3. R. Angles and C. Gutierrez. The expressive power of SPARQL. In ISWC, pages 114-129, 2008.
4. R. Angles and C. Gutiérrez. Survey of graph database models. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(1), 2008.
5. P. Barceló, C. A. Hurtado, L. Libkin, and P. T. Wood. Expressive languages for path queries over graph-structured data. In PODS, pages 3-14, 2010.
6. T. Berners-Lee. Design issues: Linked Data. http://www.w3.org/ DesignIssues/LinkedData.html July 2006.
7. T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and L. Masinter. Uniform resource identifier (URI): Generic syntax. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt 2005.
8. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data - the story so far. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 5(3):1-22, 2009.
9. C. Buil-Aranda, M. Arenas, and O. Corcho. Semantics and optimization of the SPARQL 1.1 federation extension. In ESWC, 2011.
10. D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, and M. Y. Vardi. Containment of conjunctive regular path queries with inverse. In KR, 2000.
11. J. Clark and S. DeRose. XML path language (XPath). W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath November 2008.
12. R.V. Guha D. Brickley. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema, W3C recommendation, February 2004.
13. DBpedia. http://dbpedia.org/.
14. A. Deutsch and V. Tannen. Optimization properties for classes of conjunctive regular path queries. In DBPL, pages 21-39, 2001.
15. T. Furche, B. Linse, F. Bry, D. Plexousakis, and G. Gottlob. RDF querying: Language constructs and evaluation methods compared. In Reasoning Web, pages 1-52, 2006. (Pubitemid 44568358)
16. M. R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, 1979.
17. B. Glimm and M. Krötzsch. SPARQL beyond subgraph matching. In ISWC, pages 241-256, 2010.
18. C. Gutierrez, C. A. Hurtado, A. O. Mendelzon, and J. Pérez. Foundations of semantic web databases. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 77(3):520-541, 2011.
19. S. Harris and A. Seaborne. SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C working draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/October 2010.
20. O. Hartig and A. Langegger. A database perspective on consuming Linked Data on the Web. Datenbank-Spektrum, 10(2):57-66, 2010.
21. O. Hartig, J. Sequeda, J. Taylor, and P. Sinclair. How to consume Linked Data on the Web: tutorial description. In WWW, pages 1347-1348, 2010.
22. Pat Hayes. RDF semantics, W3C Recommendation, February 2004.
23. T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011.
24. D2R DBLP Bibliography Database hosted at L3S Research Center. http://dblp.l3s.de/d2r/.
25. I. Kollia, B. Glimm, and I. Horrocks. SPARQL query answering over OWL ontologies. In ESWC, 2011.
26. F. Manola and E. Miller. RDF primer, W3C recommendation, February 2004.
27. A. O. Mendelzon and T. Milo. Formal models of Web queries. Inf. Syst., 23(8):615-637, 1998.
28. A. O. Mendelzon and P. T. Wood. Finding regular simple paths in graph databases. In VLDB, pages 185-193, 1989.
29. S. Muñoz, J. Pérez, and C. Gutiérrez. Minimal deductive systems for RDF. In ESWC, pages 53-67, 2007. (Pubitemid 47289999)
30. M. T. Özsu and P. Valduriez. Principles of Distributed Database Systems, Third Edition. Prentice-Hall, 2011.
31. P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, and I. Horrocks. OWL semantics and abstract syntax. W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/February 2004.
32. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In ISWC, pages 30-43, 2006. (Pubitemid 44892019)
33. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 34(3), 2009.
34. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. nSPARQL: A navigational language for RDF. J. Web Sem., 8(4):255-270, 2010.
35. A. Polleres. SPARQL1.1: New features and friends (OWL2, RIF). In Rules and Reasoning, pages 23-26, 2010.
36. Axel Polleres. From SPARQL to rules (and back). In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pages 787-796, 2007. (Pubitemid 47582308)
37. E. Prud'hommeaux and A. Seaborne. SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/January 2008.
38. M. Schmidt, M. Meier, and G. Lausen. Foundations of SPARQL query optimization. In ICDT, pages 4-33, 2010.
39. E. Sirin and B. Parsia. SPARQL-DL: SPARQL query for OWL-DL. In OWLED, 2007.
40. M. Y. Vardi. The complexity of relational query languages (extended abstract). In STOC, pages 137-146, 1982.
41. V. Vianu. A Web odyssey: from Codd to XML. SIGMOD Record, 32(2):68-77, 2003. (Pubitemid 40290306)