The ‘post-post period’ and environmental education research

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 401-412

  McKenzie, Marcia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960152136     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620500169361     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abram, D., 1996. The spell of the sensuous, New York: Vintage Books.
2. Britzman, D. P., 2000. “ ‘The question of belief’: writing poststructural ethnography ”. In Working the ruins: feminist poststructural theory and methods in education, Edited by: St Pierre, E. A., and Pillow, W. S., 27–40. New York: Routledge.
3. Casey, K., 1995. The new narrative research in education. Review of Research in Education, 21: 211–253.
4. Connelly, M., and Clandinin, J., 1990. Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(4): 2–13.
5. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 2000a. “ Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1–29. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 2000b. “ Part VI introduction: The future of qualitative research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1019–1023. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Ellsworth, E., 1989. Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3): 297–325.
8. Fine, M., 1994. “ Working the hyphens: reinventing self and other in qualitative research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (1st edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. R., and Lincoln, Y. S., 70–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Fine, M., and Weis, L., 1996. Writing the ‘wrongs’ of fieldwork: confronting our own research/writing dilemmas in urban ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3): 251–275.
10. Fine, M., and Weis, L., 1998. The unknown city: lives of poor and working class young adults, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
11. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., and Wong, L., 2000. “ For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 107–132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Gergen, M. M., and Gergen, K. J., 2000. “ Qualitative inquiry: tensions and transformations ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1025–1046. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Gough, A., and Gough, N., 2003. Tales from Camp Wilde: queer(y)ing environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8: 44–66.
14. Gough, N., 1999. Rethinking the subject: (de)constructing human agency in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 5: 35–48.
15. Grumet, M., 1991. “ The politics of personal knowledge ”. In Stories lives tell: narrative and dialogue in education, Edited by: Witherell, C., and Noddings, N., 67–77. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R., 2000. “ Participatory action research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 567–606. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Knapp, D., and Poff, R., 2001. A qualitative analysis of the immediate and short-term impact of an environmental interpretive program. Environmental Education Research, 7: 55–65.
18. Lather, P., 1991. Getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, London: Routledge.
19. Lather, P., 1993. Fertile obsession: validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4): 673–693.
20. Lather, P., 1995. The validity of angels: interpretive and textual strategies in researching the lives of women with HIV/AIDS. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1): 41–69.
21. Lather, P., 1996. Troubling clarity: the politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3): 525–545.
22. Lather, P., and Smithies, C., 1997. Troubling the angels: women living with HIV/AIDS, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23. Lincoln, Y. S., 1995. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1: 275–289.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., and Denzin, N. K., 2000. “ The seventh moment: out of the past ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1047–1065. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Lyotard, J., 1984. The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
26. McTaggart, R., 1997. Participatory action research: international contexts and sequences, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27. Orner, M., 1992. “ Interrupting the calls for student voice in ‘liberatory’ education: a feminist poststructuralist perspective ”. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy, Edited by: Luke, C., and Gore, J., 74–89. New York: Routledge.
28. Richardson, L., 1988. The collective story: postmodernism and the writing of sociology. Sociological Focus, 21(3): 199–208.
29. Richardson, L., 2000. “ Writing: a method of inquiry ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd edn), Edited by: Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 923–948. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Robertson, A., 1994. Toward constructivist research in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(2): 21–31.
31. St Pierre, E. A., and Pillow, W. S., 2000. “ Introduction: Inquiry among the ruins ”. In Working the ruins: feminist poststructural theory and methods in education, Edited by: St Pierre, E. A., and Pillow, W. S., 1–26. New York: Routledge.
32. Scheurich, J. J., 1997. Research method in the postmodern, Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
33. Schwandt, T. A., 1996. Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2: 58–72.
34. SooHoo, S., 1993. Students as partners in research and restructuring schools. The Educational Forum, 57(4): 386–393.
35. Van Galen, J., and Eaker, D. J., 1995. “ Beyond settling for scholarship: on defining the beginning and ending points of postmodern research ”. In Continuity and contradiction: the futures of the sociology of education, Edited by: Pink, W. T., and Noblit, G. W., 113–132. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
36. Weedon, C., 1987. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.