All about microtext: A working definition and a survey of current microtext research within artificial intelligence and natural language processing

ICAART 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 329-336

  Ellen, Jeffrey ^a  

^a Naval Command   (United States)

Author keywords

Information extraction; Microtext; Natural language processing; Semi structured data; Sentiment analysis; Text classification; Topic summarization

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION EXTRACTION; MICROTEXT; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMI STRUCTURED DATA; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TEXT CLASSIFICATION; TOPIC SUMMARIZATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; RESEARCH; SURVEYS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960134367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Abrol, S. and Khan, L. 2010. TWinner: understanding news queries with geo-content using Twitter. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Geographic information Retrieval (Zurich, Switzerland, February 18-19, 2010). GIR '10. ACM, New York, NY, 1-8
2. Adams, P., and Martell, C., 2008. Topic Detection and Extraction in Chat. In International Conference on Semantic Computing, IEEE.
3. Bullen, R.H. Jr., and Millen, J. K., 1972. Microtext: the design of a microprogrammed finite state search machine for full-text retrieval. In Proceedings of the AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences. ACM.
4. th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, AAAI, Washington, D.C., 2010.
5. Chi, E. 2009 "Information Seeking Can Be Social," Computer, pp. 42-46, March, 2009. IEEE
6. Cong, G., et al. (2008). Finding question-answer pairs from online forums. In SIGIR '08: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 467-474, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
7. Dalli, A., Xia, Y., and Wilks, Y., 2004. FASIL email summarisation system. InProceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '04). ACL, Morristown, NJ, USA, Article 994.
8. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A. 2010. Enhanced Sentiment Learning Using Twitter Hashtags and Smileys, In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 2010.
9. Flesch, R. (1948); A new readability yardstick, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 32, pp. 221-233.
10. Go, A., Bhayani, R., and Huang, L. 2010. Exploiting the Unique Characteristics of Tweets for Sentiment Analysis. CS224N Project Report, Stanford.
11. Gruhl, D., Nagarajan, M., Pieper, J., Robson, C., and Sheth, A. 2009. Context and Domain Knowledge Enhanced Entity Spotting in Informal Text. In Proceedings of the 8th international Semantic Web Conference. 260-276.
12. Kinsella, S., Passant, A., Breslin, J. 2010. Ten Years of Hyperlinks in Online Conversations. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference 2010. WWW2010.
13. Lee, C., Kwak, H., Park, H., Moon, S., 2010. Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (WWW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1137-1138.
14. Laporte, Leo. 2009. [Internet Radio Broadcast] This Week in Google 13. October 24, 2009.
15. Kopparapu, S. K., Srivastava, A., and Pande, A. 2007. SMS based natural language interface to yellow pages directory. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications, and Systems and the 1st international Symposium on Computer Human interaction in Mobile Technology ACM. Mobility '07. ACM, New York, NY, 558-563.
16. Kothari, G., Negi, S., Faruquie, T. A., Chakaravarthy, V. T., and Subramaniam, L. V. 2009. SMS based interface for FAQ retrieval. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th international Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Afnlp. Association for Computational Linguistics. Morristown, NJ, 852-860.
17. Marom, Y. and Zukerman, I. 2009. An empirical study of corpus-based response automation methods for an e-mail-based help-desk domain. Computational Linguist. 35, 4 (Dec. 2009), 597-635
18. Mowbray, M. 2010. The Twittering Machine. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2010). INSTICC 299-304.
19. O'Connor, B., Krieger, M., and Ahn, D. 2010. TweetMotif: Exploratory Search and Topic Summarization for Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC, May 2010
20. Phan, X.-H., et al. (2008). Learning to classify short and sparse text & web with hidden topics from large-scale data collections. In WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 91-100, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
21. Ranganath, R., Jurafsky, D., and McFarland, D. 2009. It's not you, it's me: detecting flirting and its misperception in speed-dates. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1. ACL.
22. Read, J. 2005. Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop ACL.
23. Ritter, A., Cherry, C. And Dolan, B. 2010 Unsupervised Modeling of Twitter Conversations. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Los Angeles, CA, 172-180.
24. Ritterman, J., Osborne, M., and Klein, E. 2009. Using prediction markets and Twitter to predict a swine flu pandemic. In 1st International Workshop on Mining Social Media - 13th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence, 2009. AEPIA (Asociación Española de Inteligencia Artificial).
25. Rosa, K. D. and Ellen, J. 2009. Text Classification Methodologies Applied to Micro-Text in Military Chat. In Proceedings of the 2009 international Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (December 13-15, 2009). ICMLA. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 710-71.
26. Sharifi, B., et al. (2010). Summarizing Microblogs Automatically. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 685-688, Los Angeles, CA. ACL.
27. Tumasjan, A., et al. 2010. Predicting Elections with Twitter: Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, AAAI, Washington, D.C., 2010.
28. Wang, A. H. 2010. Don't follow me - Spam Detection in Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT 2010). INSTICC 142-151.
29. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., and Hoffmann, P. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, Morristown, NJ, 347-354.