Indirect effects of oral tolerance improve wound healing in skin

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 487-497

  Costa, Raquel A ^a   Ruiz De Souza, Valéria ^a   Azevedo Jr , Geraldo M ^a   Gava, Elisandra ^a   Kitten, Gregory T ^a   Vaz, Nelson M ^a   Carvalho, Cláudia R ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRONECTIN; OVALBUMIN; TENASCIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; LYMPHOCYTE; MACROPHAGE; MALE; MAST CELL; MOUSE; MYOFIBROBLAST; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; ORAL TOLERANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; SKIN INCISION; SKIN INFLAMMATION; TISSUE REGENERATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; FIBRONECTINS; GRANULATION TISSUE; IMMUNE TOLERANCE; INFLAMMATION; INJECTIONS; INJECTIONS, INTRAPERITONEAL; LYMPHOCYTES; MACROPHAGES; MALE; MAST CELLS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NEUTROPHILS; OVALBUMIN; REGENERATION; SKIN; TENASCIN; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 79960104604     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00700.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT., Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008; 453: 314-21. (Pubitemid 351693137)
2. Wynn TA., Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol 2008; 214: 199-210. (Pubitemid 351160157)
3. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM., Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 514-25.
4. Martin P., Wound healinga-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997; 276: 75-81. (Pubitemid 27161246)
5. Desmouliere A., Factors influencing myofibroblast differentiation during wound healing and fibrosis. Cell Biol Int 1995; 19: 471-6.
6. Hinz B., Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 526-37.
7. Ferguson MW, O'Kane S., Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004; 359: 839-50. (Pubitemid 38673751)
8. Harty M, Neff AW, King MW, Mescher AL., Regeneration or scarring: an immunologic perspective. Dev Dyn 2003; 226: 268-79. (Pubitemid 36158171)
9. Whitby DJ, Ferguson MW., Immunohistochemical localization of growth factors in fetal wound healing. Dev Biol 1991; 147: 207-15.
10. Hibino S, Kato K, Kudoh S, Yagita H, Okumura K., Tenascin suppresses CD3-mediated T cell activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 250: 119-24. (Pubitemid 28448634)
11. Clark RAF., Fibronectin matrix deposition and fibronectin receptor expression in healing and normal skin. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94: 124s-8s.
12. Coolen NA, Schouten KC, Middelkoop E, Ulrich MM., Comparison between human fetal and adult skin. Arch Dermatol Res 2010; 302: 47-55.
13. Eming SA, Hammerschmidt M, Krieg T, Roers A., Interrelation of immunity and tissue repair or regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009; 20: 517-27.
14. Mescher AL, Neff AW., Regenerative capacity and the developing immune system. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2005; 93: 39-66. (Pubitemid 44617146)
15. Ferguson MW, Whitby DJ, Shah M, Armstrong J, Siebert JW, Longaker MT., Scar formation: the spectral nature of fetal and adult wound repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 854-60. (Pubitemid 26089457)
16. Gawronska-Kozak B, Bogacki M, Rim JS, Monroe WT, Manuel JA., Scarless skin repair in immunodeficient mice. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 265-76. (Pubitemid 43979256)
17. Armstrong JR, Ferguson MW., Ontogeny of the skin and the transition from scar-free to scarring phenotype during wound healing in the pouch young of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica. Dev Biol 1995; 169: 242-60.
18. Martin P, Leibovich SJ., Inflammatory cells during wound repair: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15: 599-607. (Pubitemid 41619424)
19. Faria AM, Weiner HL., Oral tolerance. Immunol Rev 2005; 206: 232-59. (Pubitemid 41105174)
20. Vaz NM, Faria AM, Verdolin BA, Carvalho CR., Immaturity, ageing and oral tolerance. Scand J Immunol 1997; 46: 225-9. (Pubitemid 27400225)
21. Miller A, Lider O, Weiner H., Antigen-driven bystander suppression after oral administration of antigens. J Exp Med 1991; 174: 791-8.
22. Russo M, Jancar S, Pereira de Siqueira AL, Mengel J, Gomes E, Ficker SM, Faria AMC., Prevention of lung eosinophilic inflammation by oral tolerance. Immunol Lett 1998; 61: 15-23. (Pubitemid 28161146)
23. Yoshino S, Quattrocchi E, Weiner HL., Suppression of antigen-induced athritis in Lewis rats by oral administration of type II collagen. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1092-6.
24. Rodrigues CM, Martins-Filho OA, Vaz NM, Carvalho CR, Vaz NM., Systemic effects of oral tolerance on inflammation: mobilization of lymphocytes and bone marrow eosinopoiesis. Immunology 2006; 117: 517-25.
25. Carvalho CR, Vaz NM., Indirect effects are independent of the way of tolerance induction. Scand J Immunol 1996; 43: 613-8. (Pubitemid 26165018)
26. Carvalho CR, Verdolin BA, de Souza AV, Vaz NM., Indirect effects of oral tolerance in mice. Scand J Immunol 1994; 39: 533-8. (Pubitemid 24217145)
27. Carvalho CR, Lenzi HL, Correa-Oliveira R, Vaz NM., Indirect effects of oral tolerance to ovalbumin interfere with the immune responses triggered by Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Braz J Med Biol Res 2002; 35: 1195-9. (Pubitemid 36013568)
28. Ramos GC, Rodrigues CM, Azevedo-GM Jr, Pinho V, Carvalho CR, Vaz NM., Cell-mediated immune response to unrelated proteins and unspecific inflammation blocked by orally tolerated proteins. Immunology 2009; 126: 354-62.
29. Carvalho CR, Verdolin BA, Vaz NM., Indirect effects of oral tolerance cannot be ascribed to bystander suppression. Scand J Immunol 1997; 45: 276-81. (Pubitemid 27116033)
30. Faria AM, Garcia G, Rios MJ, Michalaros CL, Vaz NM., Decrease in susceptibility to oral tolerance induction and occurrence of oral immunization to ovalbumin in 20-38-week-old mice. The effect of interval between oral exposures and rate of antigen intake in the oral immunization. Immunology 1993; 78: 147-51. (Pubitemid 23035862)
31. Cunha AP, Oliveira RP, Junior AB, Vaz NM, Carvalho CR., Different requirements for the adoptive transfer of oral tolerance and its indirect effects assessed by DTH and antibody responses in mice. Cell Immunol 2009; 258: 152-60.
32. Montes GS., Structural biology of the fibres of the collagenous and elastic systems. Cell Biol Int 1996; 20: 15-27. (Pubitemid 26128875)
33. CarvalhÃes LS, Gervásio OLAS, Guatimosin C, Heljasvaara R, Kitten GT., Collagen XVIII/endostatin is associated with the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in the atrioventricular valves during cardiac development. Dev Dyn 2006; 235: 132-4.
34. Heber-Katz E., The regenerating mouse ear. Semin Cell Dev Biol 1999; 10: 415-9. (Pubitemid 129497990)
35. Cuttle L, Nataatmadja M, Fraser JF, Kempf M, Kimble RM, Hayes MT., Collagen in the scarless fetal skin wound: detection with picrosirius- polarization. Wound Repair Regen 2005; 13: 198-204. (Pubitemid 40489870)
36. Whitby DJ, Ferguson MW., The extracellular matrix of lip wounds in fetal, neonatal and adult mice. Development 1991; 112: 651-68.
37. Whitby DJ, Longaker MT, Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Ferguson MW., Rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds is associated with the early deposition of tenascin. J Cell Sci 1991; 99 (Pt 3): 583-6.
38. Jones FS, Jones PL., The tenascin family of ECM glycoproteins: structure, function, and regulation during embryonic development and tissue remodeling. Dev Dyn 2000; 218: 235-59. (Pubitemid 30349638)
39. Midwood KS, Valenick LV, Hsia HC, Schwarzbauer JE., Coregulation of fibronectin signaling and matrix contraction by tenascin-C and syndecan-4. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15: 5670-7. (Pubitemid 39564757)
40. Wolfe AD, Nye HL, Cameron JA., Extent of ossification at the amputation plane is correlated with the decline of blastema formation and regeneration in Xenopus laevis hindlimbs. Dev Dyn 2000; 218: 681-97. (Pubitemid 30604920)