Distraction task rather than focal attention modulates gamma activity associated with auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs)

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1541-1548

  Griskova Bulanova, Inga ^a,b,c   Ruksenas, Osvaldas ^b   Dapsys, Kastytis ^a,b   Maciulis, Valentinas ^a,b   Arnfred, Sidse M H ^d,e  

^a Vilnius Republican Psychiatric Hospital   (Lithuania)

^b VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^c MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^d Mental Health Center Glostrup   (Denmark)

^e Department of Children and Youth Psychiatry ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Arousal; Attention; Auditory; Multi way matrix factorization; Steady state response

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL TASK; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SITTING; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960090001     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alegre M., Barbosa C., Valencia M., Perez-Alcazar M., Iriarte J., Artieda J. Effect of reduced attention on auditory amplitude-modulation following responses: a study with chirp-evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 25(1):42-47.
2. Arnfred S.M., Hansen L.K., Parnas J., Morup M. Proprioceptive evoked gamma oscillations. Brain Res 2007, 1147:167-174.
3. Arnfred S.M., Hansen L.K., Parnas J., Morup M. Regularity increases middle latency evoked and late induced beta brain response following proprioceptive stimulation. Brain Res 2008, 1218:114-131.
4. Barry R.J., Rushby J.A., Wallace M.J., Clarke A.R., Johnstone S.J., Zlojutro I. Caffeine effects on resting-state arousal. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116(11):2693-2700.
5. Barry R.J., Clarke A.R., Johnstone S.J., Magee C.A., Rushby J.A. EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118(12):2765-2773.
6. Barry R.J., Clarke A.R., Johnstone S.J., Brown C.R. EEG differences in children between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120(10):1806-1811.
7. Bidet-Caulet A., Fischer C., Besle J., Aguera P.E., Giard M.H., Bertrand O. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2007, 27(35):9252-9261.
8. Bourdon B. Observations comparatives sur la reconnaisance, la discrimination et l'assoication. Revue Philosophique 1895, 40:153-185.
9. Brenner C.A., Sporns O., Lysaker P.H., O'Donnell B.F. EEG synchronization to modulated auditory tones in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizotypal personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2003, 160(12):2238-2240.
10. Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991, 90(5):2467-2479.
11. de Jong R., Toffanin P., Harbers M. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention. Int J Psychophysiol 2010, 75:3-15.
12. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
13. Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981, 78:2643-2647.
14. Gander P.E., Bosnyak D.J., Wolek R., Roberts L.E. Modulation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response by attention during acoustic training. Int Congress Ser 2007, 1300:37-40.
15. Garey J., Goodwillie A., Frohlich J., Morgan M., Gustafsson J.A., Smithies O., et al. Genetic contributions to generalized arousal of brain and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(19):11019-11022.
16. Griskova I., Morup M., Parnas J., Ruksenas O., Arnfred S.M. The amplitude and phase locking factor of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal. Exp Brain Res 2007, 183(1):133-138.
17. Griskova I., Morup M., Parnas J., Ruksenas O., Arnfred S.M. Two discrete components of the 20 Hz steady-state response are distinguished through the modulation of activation level. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120(5):904-909.
18. Hari R., Hamalainen M., Joutsiniemi S.L. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1989, 86:1033-1039.
19. Hebb D.O. Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). Psychol Rev 1955, 62(4):243-254.
20. Jerger J., Chmiel R., Frost J.D., Coker N. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. Ear Hear 1986, 7:240-245.
21. Jerger J. The auditory steady-state response. J Am Acad Audiol 1998, 9(5):314.
22. Kallai I., Harsh J., Voss U. Attention to external stimuli during wakefulness and sleep: evoked 40-Hz response and N350. Psychophysiology 2003, 40(6):955-966.
23. Krishnan G.P., Hetrick W.P., Brenner C.A., Shekhar A., Steffen A.N., O'Donnell B.F. Steady state and induced auditory gamma deficits in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2009, 47(4):1711-1719.
24. Kwon J.S., O'Donnell B.F., Wallenstein G.V., Greene R.W., Hirayasu Y., Nestor P.G., et al. Gamma frequency-range abnormalities to auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999, 56(11):1001-1005.
25. Landau A.N., Esterman M., Robertson L.C., Bentin S., Prinzmetal W. Different effects of voluntary and involuntary attention on EEG activity in the gamma band. J Neurosci 2007, 27(44):11986-11990.
26. Lazzouni L., Ross B., Voss P., Lepore F. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121(2):200-207.
27. Liegeois-Chauvel C., Lorenzi C., Trebuchon A., Regis J., Chauvel P. Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14(7):731-740.
28. Light G.A., Hsu J.L., Hsieh M.H., Meyer-Gomes K., Sprock J., Swerdlow N.R., et al. Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 2006, 60(11):1231-1240.
29. Linden R.D., Campbell K.B., Hamel G., Picton T.W. Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985, 6(3):167-174.
30. Linden R.D., Picton T.W., Hamel G., Campbell K.B. Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 66(2):145-159.
31. Makela J.P., Hari R. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 66:539-546.
32. Morup M., Hansen L.K., Herrmann C.S., Parnas J., Arnfred S.M. Parallel factor analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. Neuroimage 2006, 29(3):938-947.
33. Morup M., Hansen L.K., Arnfred S.M. ERPWAVELAB a toolbox for multi-channel analysis of time-frequency transformed event related potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 161(2):361-368.
34. Muller-Gass A., Stelmack R.M., Campbell K.B. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116(9):2142-2152.
35. Muller-Gass A., Stelmack R.M., Campbell K.B. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Brain Res 2006, 1078(1):112-130.
36. Muller N., Schlee W., Hartmann T., Lorenz I., Weisz N. Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm. Front Hum Neurosci 2009, 3:1.
37. O'Donnell B.F., Hetrick W.P., Vohs J.L., Krishnan G.P., Carroll C.A., Shekhar A. Neural synchronization deficits to auditory stimulation in bipolar disorder. Neuroreport 2004, 15(8):1369-1372.
38. Oken B.S., Salinsky M.C., Elsas S.M. Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117(9):1885-1901.
39. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 1996, 101(1-2):62-74.
40. Pastor M.A., Thut G., Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS. Exp Brain Res 2006, 175:702-709.
41. Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003, 42(4):177-219.
42. Pockett S., Tan S.M. The auditory steady-state response is not a suitable monitor of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2002, 95(5):1318-1323.
43. Ross B., Picton T.W., Herdman A.T., Pantev C. The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 22.
44. Saupe K., Widmann A., Bendixen A., Muller M.M., Schroger E. Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(2):321-327.
45. Skosnik P.D., Krishnan G.P., O'Donnell B.F. The effect of selective attention on the gamma-band auditory steady-state response. Neurosci Lett 2007, 420(3):223-228.