Effect of reduced attention on auditory amplitude-modulation following responses: A study with chirp-evoked potentials

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-47

  Alegre, Manuel ^a,b   Barbosa, Carla ^b   Valencia, Miguel ^a   Pérez Alcázar, Marta ^a   Iriarte, Jorge ^a,b   Artieda, Julio ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation following responses; Attention; Chirp evoked potentials; Steady state potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 40049096312     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318162e544     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, et al. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993;65:253-261.
2. Artieda J, Valencia M, Alegre M,. Potentials evoked by chirp-modulated tones: a new technique to evaluate oscillatory activity in the auditory pathway. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:699-709.
3. Cohen L. Time-frequency distributions: a review. Proc IEEE 1989;77:941-981.
4. Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;90:2467-2479.
5. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Van Roon P, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:205-224.
6. Dutton RC, Smith WD, Rampil IJ, et al. Forty-hertz midlatency auditory evoked potential activity predicts wakeful response during desflurane and propofol anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1999;91:1209-1220.
7. Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff PJ. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981;78:2643-2647.
8. Galbraith GC, Olfman DM, Huffman TM. Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response. NeuroReport 2003;14:735-738.
9. Gurtubay IG, Alegre M, Labarga A, et al. Gamma band activity in an auditory oddball paradigm studied with the Wavelet Transform. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1219-1228.
10. Gurtubay IG, Alegre M, Valencia M, Artieda J. Cortical gamma activity during auditory tone omission provides evidence for the involvement of oscillatory activity in top-down processing. Exp Brain Res 2006;175:463-470.
11. Hari R, Hamalainen M, Joutsiniemi SL. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;86:1033-1039.
12. Herdman AT, Lins O, Van Roon P, et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 2002;15:69-86.
13. Jerger J, Chmiel R, Frost JD Jr, Coker N. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. Ear Hear 1986;7:240-5.
14. Levi EC, Folsom RC, Dobie RA. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res 1993;68:42-52.
15. Light GA, Hsu JL, Hsieh MH, et al. Gamma band oscillations reveal neural network cortical coherence dysfunction in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 2006;60:1231-1240.
16. Linden RD, Campbell KB, Hamel G, Picton TW. Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985;6:167-174.
17. Linden RD, Picton TW, Hamel G, Campbell KB. Human auditory steadystate evoked potentials during selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;66:145-159.
18. Lins OG, Picton PE, Picton TW, et al. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:3051-3063.
19. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, et al. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 2002;295:690-694.
20. Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, et al. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Audiology 1990;29:322-328.
21. Picton TW, Skinner CR, Champagne SC, et al. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:165-178.
22. Plourde G, Baribeau J, Bonhomme V. Ketamine increases the amplitude of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in humans. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:524-529.
23. Ross B, Picton TW, Herdman AT, Pantev C. The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 2004;22:22.
24. Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, et al. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 1984;5:105-113.
25. Suzuki T, Kobayashi K, Umegaki Y. Effect of natural sleep on auditory steady state responses in adult subjects with normal hearing. Audiology 1994;33:274-279.
26. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J. Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J Neurosci 1996;16:4240-4249.
27. Tiitinen H, Sinkkonen J, Reinikainen K, et al. Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature 1993;364:59-60.
28. Valencia M, Alegre M, Iriarte J, Artieda J. High frequency oscillations in the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are mainly due to phase-resetting phenomena. J Neurosci Methods 2006;154:142-148.
29. Yordanova J, Kolev V, Demiralp T. Effects of task variables on the amplitude and phase-locking of auditory gamma band responses in human. Int J Neurosci 1997;92:241-258.