Lexical Integrity As A Formal Universal: A Constructionist View

Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 76, Issue , 2009, Pages 83-100

  Booij, Geert ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Construction grammar; inflection; lexical integrity; morphological universals; morphology syntax interface; word formation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960078267     PISSN: 09244670     EISSN: 22150358     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Ackema, Peter and Ad Neeleman. 2005. Beyond Morphology. Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, Stephen R. 2004. Morphological universals and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer.
4. Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of a Theory of Clitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Compounding. In Language Typology and Language Universals, eds. Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, Vol. 1, 695–707. Berlin: De Gruyter.
6. Beard, Robert. 1991. Decompositional composition: The semantics of scope ambiguities and “bracketing paradoxes”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 195–229.
7. Bijker, Wiebe and Ben Peperkamp. 2002. Geëngageerde geesteswetenschappen. Perspectieven op cultuurveranderingen in een digitaliserend tijdperk. Den Haag: Adviesraad voor Wetenschaps-en Technologiebeleid.
8. Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–573.
9. Blom, Corrien. 2005. Complex predicates in Dutch, Synchrony and Diachrony. Ph. D. Diss. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.
10. Booij, Geert. 1985. Conjunction reduction in complex words: a case for prosodic phonology. In Advances in Non-linear Phonology, eds. Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, 143–160. Dordrecht: Foris.
11. Booij, Geert. 1994. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 27–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the Split Morphology hypothesis. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Booij, Geert. 2002. The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Booij, Geert. 2005a. Construction-dependent morphology. Lingue e Linguaggio 5: 163–178.
15. Booij, Geert. 2005b. The demarcation of derivation and compounding: evidence for Construction Morphology. In Morphology and its Boundaries, eds. Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar Pfeiffer, and Franz Rainer, 111–132. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Booij, Geert. 2005c. The interface between morphology and phonology. Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2: 17–25.
17. Booij, Geert. 2008. Constructional idioms as products of linguistic change: the aan het + INFINTIVE construction in Dutch. In Construction Grammar and Language Change, eds. Alexander Bergs, and Gabriele Diewald, 79–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Bresnan, Joan and Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254.
19. Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Bybee, Joan. 2006. Language change and universals. In Linguistic Universals, eds. Ricardo Mairal, and Juana Gil, 179–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Morphology without word-internal constituents A review of Anderson (1992). In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 209–234. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
24. Comrie, Bernard. 2001. Different views of language typology. In Language Typology and Language Universals, eds. Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, Vol. 1, 25–39 Berlin: De Gruyter.
25. Corbett, Greville G. 1987. The morphology/syntax interface. Language 63: 299–345.
26. Dahl, Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. 2 ].
28. Gurevich, Olga I. 2006. Constructional Morphology. The Georgian Version. Ph. D. diss, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
29. Hawkins, John A., and Anne Cutler. 1988. Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In Explaining Language Universals, ed. John Hawkins, 280–305. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Harris, Alice. 2000. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76: 593–616.
31. Harris, Alice. 2004. The challenge of typologically unusual structures. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Catania, 21–23 September 2004, eds. Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, and Salvatore Sgroi. http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/proc-mmm4.php
32. Harris, Alice. 2006a. In other words: External modifiers in Georgian. Morphology 16: 205–229.
33. Harris, Alice. 2006b. Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82: 114–130.
34. Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. To appear in Language Universals and Language Change, ed. Jeff Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Explaining some universals of causative verb formation. Lecture, LSA meeting Anaheim.
36. Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2004. Cross-linguistic generalizations and their explanations. In Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, eds. Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, and Stavros Skopeteas, 1247–1254. Berlin: De Gruyter.
37. Henderson, John. 2002. The word in Eastern / Central Arrernte. In Word. A Cross-linguistic Typology, eds. R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 100–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1992. Compounding in Hungarian. Rivista di Linguistica 4: 61–78.
39. Lieber, Rochelle, and Sergio Scalise. 2006. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. Lingue e Linguaggio 6: 7–32.
40. Loey, A. van 1959. Schönfelds Historische Grammatica van het Nederlands. Zutphen: Thieme.
41. Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht 1996. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72: 215–247.
42. Samvelian, P. 2006. Pronominal clitics in Sorani (Central) Kurdish Dialects. Paper presented at the 5th Décembrettes Morphology Meeting, Université de Toulouse, 7–8 December 2006.
43. Scalise, Sergio (ed.). 1992. The Morphology of Compounding. Rivista di Linguistica 4: 1–251.
44. Schreuder, Robert and Harald Baayen. 1997. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118–139.
45. Spencer, Andrew. 1988. “Bracketing paradoxes” and the English lexicon. Language 64: 663–682.
46. Vigario, Marina. 2003. The Prosodic Word in European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.