Model development for EHR interdisciplinary information exchange of ICU common goals

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Collins, Sarah A ^a   Bakken, Suzanne ^a   Vawdrey, David K ^a   Coiera, Enrico ^b   Currie, Leanne ^c  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Intensive care unit; Interdisciplinary communication; Model development

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING; COMMUNICATION SPACES; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; DOCUMENTATION TOOLS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ESSENTIAL COMPONENT; FOCUS GROUPS; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; INFORMATION LOSS; INFORMATION TOOLS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS; VERBAL INFORMATION;

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NURSING; RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA SYNTHESIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MOTIVATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES;

EID: 79960065265     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. National Research Council Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions 2009, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
2. Strople B., Ottani P. Can technology improve intershift report? What the research reveals. J. Prof. Nurs. 2006, 22:197-204.
3. Arora V., Johnson J., Lovinger D., Humphrey H.J., Meltzer D.O. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005, 14:401-407.
4. Pronovost P., Wu A., Sexton J. Acute decompensation after removing a central line: practical approaches to increasing safety in the intensive care unit. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 140:1025-1033.
5. Patel V.L., Zhang J., Yoskowitz N.A., Green R., Sayan O.R. Translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: a review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2008, 41:413-431.
6. Humbert J., Gallagher K., Gabbay R., Dellasega C. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill geriatric patient. Crit. Care Nurs. Q. 2008, 31:14-18.
7. Creswick N., Westbrook J.I., Braithwaite J. Understanding communication networks in the emergency department. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2009, 9:247.
8. Stein-Parbury J., Liaschenko J. Understanding collaboration between nurses and physicians as knowledge at work. Am. J. Crit. Care 2007, 16:470-477. (quiz 478).
9. Donohue L.A., Endacott R. Track, trigger and teamwork: communication of deterioration in acute medical and surgical wards, Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 2010, 26:10-17.
10. Raja U., Mitchell T., Day T., Hardin J.M. Text mining in healthcare. Applications and opportunities. J. Healthc Inf. Manag. 2008, 22:52-56.
11. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2000, 7:277-286.
12. Collins S., Currie L., Patel V.L., Bakken S., Cimino J.J. Multitasking by clinicians in the context of CPOE and CIS use. Medinfo 2007, 12:958-962.
13. Hazlehurst B., McMullen C.K., Gorman P.N. Distributed cognition in the heart room: how situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery. J. Biomed. Inform. 2007, 40:539-551.
14. Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Zhang J., Patel V.L., Johnson K., Smith J., Malin J. Designing human-centered distributed information systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2002, 17:42-47.
16. Brod M., Tesler L.E., Christensen T.L. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18:1263-1278.
17. Clark H., Brennan S. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition 1991, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L. Resnick, J. Levine, S. Teasley (Eds.).
18. Cresswell K., Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Inform. Prim. Care 2009, 17:153-160.
19. Tobin A.E., Santamaria J.D. After-hours discharges from intensive care are associated with increased mortality. Med. J. Aust. 2006, 184:334-337.
20. Kim H., Harris M.R., Savova G.K., Chute C.G. The first step toward data reuse: disambiguating concept representation of the locally developed ICU nursing flowsheets. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2008, 26:282-289.
21. Cosby K.S., Croskerry P. Profiles in patient safety: authority gradients in medical error. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2004, 11:1341-1345.
22. IOM To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. The Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine 2000, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. J. Corrigan, L.T. Kohn, M. Donaldson (Eds.).
23. Mitchell B., Petrovskaya O., McIntyre M., Frisch N. Where is nursing in the electronic health record?. Advances in Information Technology and Communication in Health 2009, ITCH 2009 Steering Committee and IOS Press. J.G. McDaniel (Ed.).
24. Hazlehurst B., McMullen C., Gorman P., Sittig D. How the ICU follows orders: care delivery as a complex activity system. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2003, 284-288.
25. Baggs J.G., Schmitt M.H. Nurses' and Resident Physicians' Perceptions of the Process of Collaboration in an MICU. Res. Nurs. Health 1997, 20:71-80.