Evaluation of mailed pediatric buccal cytobrushes for use in a case-control study of birth defects

Birth Defects Research Part A - Clinical and Molecular Teratology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 642-648

  Gallagher, Margaret L ^a   Sturchio, Cynthia ^b   Smith, Ashley ^b   Koontz, Deborah ^a   Jenkins, Mary M ^c   Honein, Margaret A ^c   Rasmussen, Sonja A ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Buccal cells; Cytobrush; DNA; Genotyping; Whole genome amplification

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME P450 1A1; CYTOCHROME P450 1A2; CYTOCHROME P450 2A6; DNA; NAT2 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY DEVICE; BIRTH DEFECT; BUCCAL CYTOBRUSHES; CHEEK; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DESICCATION; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA EXTRACTION; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; DNA; FATHERS; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MOTHERS; MOUTH MUCOSA; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 79960051696     PISSN: 15420752     EISSN: 15420760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20829     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bergen AW, Haque KA, Qi Y, et al. 2005. Comparison of yield and genotyping performance of multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlex whole genome amplified DNA generated from multiple DNA sources. Hum Mutat 26: 262-270.
2. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, et al. 2002. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 5261-5266.
3. Dean FB, Nelson JR, Giesler TL, Lasken RS. 2001. Rapid amplification of plasmid and phage DNA using Phi 29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle amplification. Genome Res 11: 1095-1099.
4. Dlugos DJ, Scattergood TM, Ferraro TN, et al. 2005. Recruitment rates and fear of phlebotomy in pediatric patients in a genetic study of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 6: 444-446.
5. Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Robertson AS, et al. 2001. Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10: 1005-1008.
6. Freeman B, Powell J, Ball D, et al. 1997. DNA by mail: an inexpensive and noninvasive method for collecting DNA samples from widely dispersed populations. Behav Genet 27: 251-257.
7. Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, et al. 2001. Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10: 687-696.
8. Garcia-Closas M, Moore LE, Rabkin CS, et al. 2006. Quantitation of DNA in buccal cell samples collected in epidemiological studies. Biomarkers 11: 472-479.
9. Gill P, Sparkes R, Fereday L, Werrett DJ. 2000. Report of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENSFI): formulation and testing of principles to evaluate STR multiplexes. Forensic Sci Int 108: 1-29.
10. Heath EM, Morken NW, Campbell KA, et al. 2001. Use of buccal cells collected in mouthwash as a source of DNA for clinical testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125: 127-133.
11. Hosono S, Faruqi AF, Dean FB, et al. 2003. Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples. Genome Res 13: 954-964.
12. Jenkins MM, Reed-Gross E, Rasmussen SA, et al. 2009. Maternal attitudes toward DNA collection for gene-environment studies: a qualitative research study. Am J Med Genet A 149A: 2378-2386.
13. King IB, Satia-Abouta J, Thornquist MD, et al. 2002. Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(10 Pt 1): 1130-1133.
14. Krakowiak PA, Guan Y, Greenhaw JJ, et al. 2003. Quality of human DNA from buccal cytobrushes depends on storage conditions. Am J Hum Genet 73S: 411.
15. Langmore JP. 2002. Rubicon Genomics, Inc. Pharmacogenomics 3: 557-560.
16. Le Marchand L, Lum-Jones A, Saltzman B, et al. 2001. Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10: 701-703.
17. Lench N, Stanier P, Williamson R. 1988. Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis. Lancet 1: 1356-1358.
18. Liang X, Trentham-Dietz A, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al. 2007. Whole-genome amplification of oral rinse self-collected DNA in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 1610-1614.
19. Lum A, Le Marchand L. 1998. A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7: 719-724.
20. Mead S, Poulter M, Beck J, et al. 2008. Successful amplification of degraded DNA for use with high-throughput SNP genotyping platforms. Hum Mutat 29: 1452-1458.
21. Meulenbelt I, Droog S, Trommelen GJ, et al. 1995. High-yield noninvasive human genomic DNA isolation method for genetic studies in geographically dispersed families and populations. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1252-1254.
22. Milne E, van Bockxmeer FM, Robertson L, et al. 2006. Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15: 816-819.
23. Moore L, Wiencke J, Eng C, et al. 2001. Evaluation of buccal cell collection protocols for genetic susceptibility studies. Biomarkers 6: 448-454.
24. Moore LE, Bergen AW, Haque KA, et al. 2007. Whole genome amplification of buccal cytobrush DNA collected for molecular epidemiology studies. Biomarkers 12: 303-312.
25. Mulot C, Stücker I, Clavel J, et al. 2005. Collection of human genomic DNA from buccal cells for genetics studies: comparison between cytobrush, mouthwash, and treated card. J Biomed Biotechnol 2005: 291-296.
26. Murphy NR, Hellwig RJ. 1996. Improved nucleic acid organic extraction through use of a unique gel barrier material. Biotechniques 21: 934-936, 938-939.
27. Navidi W, Arnheim N, Waterman MS. 1992. A multiple-tubes approach for accurate genotyping of very small DNA samples by using PCR: statistical considerations. Am J Hum Genet 50: 347-359.
28. Rasmussen SA, Lammer EJ, Shaw GM, et al. 2002. Integration of DNA sample collection into a multi-site birth defects case-control study. Teratology 66: 177-184.
29. Richards B, Skoletsky J, Shuber AP, et al. 1993. Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs. Hum Mol Genet 2: 159-163.
30. Rogers NL, Cole SA, Lan HC, et al. 2007. New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studies. Am J Hum Biol 19: 319-326.
31. Saftlas AF, Waldschmidt M, Logsden-Sackett N, et al. 2004. Optimizing buccal cell DNA yields in mothers and infants for human leukocyte antigen genotyping. Am J Epidemiol 160: 77-84.
32. Walker AH, Najarian D, White DL, et al. 1999. Collection of genomic DNA by buccal swabs for polymerase chain reaction-based biomarker assays. Environ Health Perspect 107: 517-520.
33. Walsh DJ, Corey AC, Cotton RW, et al. 1992. Isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from saliva and forensic science samples containing saliva. J Forensic Sci 37: 387-395.
34. Witsø E, Stene LC, Paltiel L, et al. 2002. DNA extraction and HLA genotyping using mailed mouth brushes from children. Pediatr Diabetes 3: 89-94.
35. Yoon PW, Rasmussen SA, Lynberg MC, et al. 2001. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Public Health Rep 116 Suppl 1: 32-40.
36. Zheng S, Ma X, Buffler PA, et al. 2001. Whole genome amplification increases the efficiency and validity of buccal cell genotyping in pediatric populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10: 697-700.