Risk Assessment for invasiveness differs for aquatic and terrestrial plant species

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1829-1842

  Gordon, Doria R ^a   Gantz, Crysta A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic plants; Australian Weed Risk Assessment; Invasive; Prevention

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AQUATIC PLANT; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVASIVENESS; NATURALIZATION; PLANT COMMUNITY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; THRESHOLD; VASCULAR PLANT;

UNITED STATES;

TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 79960046429     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-011-0002-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves. Crit Care 8: 508-512.
2. Bisset P (1905) The book of water gardening. A. T. De la Mare, New York, p 199.
3. Bureau of Invasive Plant Management (2008) Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters. Annual Report Fiscal Year 2006-2007. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida. http://www. myfwc. com/docs/WildlifeHabitats/InvasivePlants_Aquatic06-07. pdf. Accessed May 20, 2009.
4. Burns JH (2006) Relatedness and environment affect traits associated with invasive and noninvasive introduced Commelinaceae. Ecol Appl 16: 1367-1376.
5. Champion PD, Clayton JS (2000) Border control for potential aquatic weeds. Stage 1. Weed risk model. Science for conservation 141. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
6. Champion PD, Clayton JS (2001) A weed risk assessment model for aquatic weeds in New Zealand. In: Groves RH, Panetta FD, Virtue JG (eds) Weed risk assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, Australia, pp 194-202.
7. Champion PD, Burnett DA, Petroeschevsky A (2008) Risk assessment of aquatic plant trade species in Australia. Report to: New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and National Aquatic Weeds Management Group, NIWA Client Report AUS2008/001, NIWA Project NAU07901, Western Australia, Australia.
8. Chittenden FJ (ed) (1951) The royal horticultural society dictionary of gardening, vol 4. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 604.
9. Ciruna KA, Meyerson LA, Gutierrez A (2004) The ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems. Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity on behalf of the Global Invasive Species Programme, Washington, D. C., p 34.
10. Coile NC (1995) Common plants of Florida's aquatic plant industry. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of plant industry, Gainesville, Florida, p 132.
11. Cook CDK, Gut BJ, Rix EM, Schneller J, Seitz M (1974) Water plants of the world. Dr. W Junk BV Publishers, The Hague, p 561.
12. Crosson H (2005) Keeping aquatic plants in their place: Common sense tips to protect lakes and rivers. LandscapeOnline. com. http://www. plantright. org/library/pdfs/Crosson2005. pdf. Accessed May 20, 2009.
13. Crusio W (1979) A revision of Anubias Araceae Primitiae Africanae 12. Meded Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 79(14): 1-48.
14. Daehler CC (1998) The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol Conserv 84: 167-180.
15. Daehler CC (2009) Short lag times for invasive tropical plants: Evidence from experimental plantings in Hawai'i. PLoS ONE 4(2): e4462. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0004462.
16. Daehler CC, Carino DA (2000) Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol Invasions 2: 93-102.
17. Daehler CC, Denslow JS, Ansari S, Kuo H (2004) A risk-assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conserv Biol 18: 360-368.
18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837-845.
19. Gordon DR, Gantz CA (2008) Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening new plants for invasiveness. Conserv Lett 1: 227-235.
20. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK (2008a) Accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Divers Distrib 14: 234-242.
21. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK, Gantz C (2008b) Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian weed risk assessment. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1: 178-195.
22. Gordon DR, Mitterdorfer B, Pheloung PC, Ansari S, Buddenhagen C, Chimera C, Daehler CC, Dawson W, Denslow JS, LaRosa A, Nishida T, Onderdonk DA, Panetta FD, Pyšek P, Randall RP, Richardson DM, Tshidada NJ, Virtue JG, Williams PA (2010) Guidance for addressing the Australian weed risk assessment questions. Plant Prot Q 25(2): 56-74.
23. Haynes RR, Holm-Nielsen LB (1994) The Alismataceae. In: Flora Neotropica 64: 1-112. New York Botanical Garden Press on behalf of Organization for Flora Neotropica, New York.
24. Kato H, Hata K, Yamamoto H, Yoshioka T (2006) Effectiveness of the weed risk assessment system for the Bonin Islands. In: Koike F, Clout MN, Kawamichi M, De Poorter M, Iwatsuki K (eds) Assessment and control of biological invasion risk. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, Japan and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 65-72.
25. Keller RP, Lodge DM, Finnoff DC (2007) Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. PNAS 104: 203-207.
26. Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasion with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions-general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 15-38.
27. Křivánek M, Pyšek P (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers Distrib 12: 319-327.
28. Les DH, Mehrhoff LJ (1999) Introduction of nonindigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biol Invasions 1: 281-300.
29. Mack RN (2000) Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biol Invasions 2: 111-122.
30. Maki K, Galatowitsch S (2004) Movement of invasive aquatic plants into Minnesota (USA) through horticultural trade. Biol Conserv 118: 389-396.
31. McClay A, Sissons A, Wilson C, Davis S (2010) Evaluation of the Australia Weed Risk Assessment system for the prediction of plant invasiveness in Canada. Biol Invasions 12: 4085-4098.
32. Nishida T, Yamashita N, Asai M, Kurokawa S, Enomoto T, Pheloung PC, Groves RH (2009) Developing a pre-entry weed risk assessment system for use in Japan. Biol Invasions 11: 1319-1333.
33. Office of Technology Assessment (1993) Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. U. S. Congress/OTA-F-565, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
34. Pheloung PC (1995) Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia. A report on the development of a Weed Risk Assessment System commissioned by the Australian Weeds Committee and the Plant Industries Committee, Perth, Western Australia.
35. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manage 57: 239-251.
36. Sawyer RV, Perkins EH (1934) Water gardens and goldfish. New York, A. T. De La Mare, New York and General Publishing Company, Ltd, Toronto, Canada, p 259.
37. Schmitz DC, Schardt JD, Leslie AJ, Dray FA, Osborne JA, Nelson BV (1993) The ecological impact and management history of three invasive alien aquatic plant species in Florida. In: McKnight BN (ed) Biological pollution: the control and impact of invasive exotic species. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana, pp 173-194.
38. Smith CS, Lonsdale WM, Fortune J (1999) When to ignore advice: invasion predictions and decision theory. Biol Invasions 1: 89-96.
39. Speichert G, Speichert S (2004) Encyclopedia of water garden plants. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, p 386.
40. Stodola J (1967) Encyclopedia of water plants. TFH Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, p 368.
41. Stuckey RL, Salamon DP (1987) Typha angustifolia in North America: a foreigner masquerading as a native. Am J Bot 74: 757.
42. Tricker W (1897) The water garden. AT De La Mare, New York, p 120.
43. van TK, Wheeler GS, Center TD (1999) Competition between Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria americana as influenced by soil fertility. Aquat Bot 62: 225-233.
44. Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86: 3212-3218.
45. Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF (2008) Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. [Landry SM, Campbell KN (application development), Florida Center for Community Design and Research.] Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida, Tampa. http://www. florida. plantatlas. usf. edu/. Accessed May 6, 2009.
46. Zedler JB, Paling E, McComb A (1990) Differential salinity responses help explain the replacement of native Juncus kraussii by Typha orientalis in Western Australian salt marshes. Austral J Ecol 15: 57-72.
47. Zhang Z, Pepe MS (2005) A linear regression framework for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Washington: University of Washington Biostatistics Working Paper Series, paper 253.