Communication genres: Integrating communication into the software engineering curriculum

2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEE and T 2011 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 21-30

  Carter, Michael ^a   Vouk, Mladen ^a   Gannod, Gerald C ^b   Burge, Janet E ^b   Anderson, Paul V ^b   Hoffman, Mark E ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEST POSITION; ENGINEERING GRADUATES; SITUATED LEARNING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CURRICULA;

COMMUNICATION; CURRICULA; ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 79960019325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSEET.2011.5876091     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
4. Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. (2004). Teaching genre to English first-language adults: A study of the laboratory report. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 395-419.
5. Carter, M. (2007a). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58, 385-418.
6. Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. N. (2007b). Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, 278-302.
7. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Pare, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.
9. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
10. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151-167.
13. Miller, C. R. (1994). "Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre." In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric. (pp. 67-78). . Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
14. Orr, T. (1999). Genre in the Field of Computer Science and Computer Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 32-37.
15. Paretti, M. C. (2008). Teaching communication in capstone design: The role of the instructor in situated learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 491-503.
16. Reave, L. (2004). Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of topranked U.S. and Canadian programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452-490.
17. Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
18. Russell, D. R. (1991). Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870-1990: A Curricular History. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
19. Walker, C. H., & Meyer, B. J. F. (1980). Integrating different types of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal and Verbal Behavior 19(3), 263-275.