-
1
-
-
79954550665
-
The public's response to the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening
-
Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AR, Bann CM, Renaud JM,. The public's response to the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prey Med. 2011; 40: 497-504.
-
(2011)
Am J Prey Med
, vol.40
, pp. 497-504
-
-
Squiers, L.B.1
Holden, D.J.2
Dolina, S.E.3
Kim, A.R.4
Bann, C.M.5
Renaud, J.M.6
-
2
-
-
72049100691
-
Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
-
US Preventive Services Task Force.;:; W-236.
-
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 716-726; W-236.
-
(2009)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.151
, pp. 716-726
-
-
-
3
-
-
0038715898
-
American Cancer Society Guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003
-
Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J CIin. 2003; 54: 141-169. (Pubitemid 36722306)
-
(2003)
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
, vol.53
, Issue.3
, pp. 141-169
-
-
Smith, R.A.1
Saslow, D.2
Andrews Sawyer, K.3
Burke, W.4
Costanza, M.E.5
Evans III, W.P.6
Foster Jr., R.S.7
Hendrick, E.8
Eyre, H.J.9
Sener, S.10
-
4
-
-
79951834315
-
Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: A review to current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening
-
Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Shah M, Brawley O,. Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: a review to current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61: 8-30.
-
(2011)
CA Cancer J Clin
, vol.61
, pp. 8-30
-
-
Smith, R.A.1
Cokkinides, V.2
Brooks, D.3
Saslow, D.4
Shah, M.5
Brawley, O.6
-
6
-
-
79960005472
-
Survey to screening mammography ordering practices to primary care physicians before and after the release to the November 2009 United States Preventative Services Task Force screening mammography guidelines
-
Takahashi J, Hardesty L, Jin M, Horn W,. Survey to screening mammography ordering practices to primary care physicians before and after the release to the November 2009 United States Preventative Services Task Force screening mammography guidelines. AIR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: A1.
-
(2011)
AIR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.196
-
-
Takahashi, J.1
Hardesty, L.2
Jin, M.3
Horn, W.4
-
7
-
-
79251529184
-
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: Science ignored
-
Hendrick RE, Helvie MA,. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W112-W116.
-
(2011)
AJR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.196
-
-
Hendrick, R.E.1
Helvie, M.A.2
-
8
-
-
79959925695
-
Neglecting to screen women aged 4049 years with mammography: What is the impact on breast cancer diagnosis
-
Plecha D, Kremer M, Pham R, et al. Neglecting to screen women aged 4049 years with mammography: what is the impact on breast cancer diagnosis. MR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196: A2.
-
(2011)
MR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.196
-
-
Plecha, D.1
Kremer, M.2
Pham, R.3
-
9
-
-
79551718990
-
Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: Evaluation to the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY)cohort
-
Hellquist BN, Dully SW, Abdsaleh S, et al. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation to the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY)cohort. Cancer. 2011; 117: 714-722.
-
(2011)
Cancer
, vol.117
, pp. 714-722
-
-
Hellquist, B.N.1
Dully, S.W.2
Abdsaleh, S.3
-
10
-
-
0023230928
-
What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial
-
Tabar L, Faberberg C, Day NE, Holmberg L,. What is the optimum interval betueen mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the late results to the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer. 1987; 55: 547-551. (Pubitemid 17098866)
-
(1987)
British Journal of Cancer
, vol.55
, Issue.5
, pp. 547-551
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Faberberg, G.2
Day, N.E.3
Holmberg, L.4
-
11
-
-
0032811791
-
Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: A review of 24,211 examinations
-
Hunt KA, Rosen EL, Sickles RE,. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review to 24,211 examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 285-289. (Pubitemid 29347342)
-
(1999)
American Journal of Roentgenology
, vol.173
, Issue.2
, pp. 285-289
-
-
Hunt, K.A.1
Rosen, E.L.2
Sickles, E.A.3
-
12
-
-
79952663827
-
Comparison to costs and benefits to breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI
-
ix.
-
Feig S,. Comparison to costs and benefits to breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011; 38: 179-196, ix.
-
(2011)
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am
, vol.38
, pp. 179-196
-
-
Feig, S.1
-
13
-
-
0029072372
-
Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness
-
Tengs TO, Adams M, Pliskin J, et al. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal. 1995; 15: 369-390.
-
(1995)
Risk Anal
, vol.15
, pp. 369-390
-
-
Tengs, T.O.1
Adams, M.2
Pliskin, J.3
-
14
-
-
0032103495
-
Screening mammography beginning at age 40 years: A reappraisal of cost- effectiveness
-
DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2235::AID-CNCR19>3.0. CO;2-V
-
Rosenquist Cl, Lindtors KK,. Screening mammography beginning at age 40 years: a reappraisal to cost-effectiveness. Cancer. 1998; 82: 2235-2240. (Pubitemid 28240831)
-
(1998)
Cancer
, vol.82
, Issue.11
, pp. 2235-2240
-
-
Rosenquist, C.J.1
Lindfors, K.K.2
-
15
-
-
67649846316
-
Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s
-
Gierisch JM, O'Neill SC, Rimer BK, DeFrank JT, Bowling JM, Skinner CS,. Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009; 33: 72-78.
-
(2009)
Cancer Epidemiol
, vol.33
, pp. 72-78
-
-
Gierisch, J.M.1
O'Neill, S.C.2
Rimer, B.K.3
Defrank, J.T.4
Bowling, J.M.5
Skinner, C.S.6
-
16
-
-
77950831807
-
-
Gierisch JM, Earp JA, Brewer NT, Rimer BK,. Longitudinal predictors to nonadherence to maintenance to mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey. 2010; 19: 1103-1111.
-
(2010)
Longitudinal Predictors to Nonadherence to Maintenance to Mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey
, vol.19
, pp. 1103-1111
-
-
Gierisch, J.M.1
Earp, J.A.2
Brewer, N.T.3
Rimer, B.K.4
-
17
-
-
0037467492
-
Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1
-
Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HT, Smith RA, Duffy SW,. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction to screening. Lancer 2003; 361: 1405-1410. (Pubitemid 36515039)
-
(2003)
Lancet
, vol.361
, Issue.9367
, pp. 1405-1410
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Yen, M.-F.2
Vitak, B.3
Tony Chen, H.-H.4
Smith, R.A.5
Duffy, S.W.6
-
18
-
-
0033178443
-
The natural history of breast carcinoma: What have we learned from screening?
-
DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<449::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2- Q
-
Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC,. The natural history to breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer. 1999; 86: 449-462. (Pubitemid 29347407)
-
(1999)
Cancer
, vol.86
, Issue.3
, pp. 449-462
-
-
Tabar, L.1
Duffy, S.W.2
Vitak, B.3
Chen, H.-H.4
Prevost, T.C.5
-
19
-
-
38749100579
-
Mammography screening to women in their 40s: Impact to changes in screening guidelines
-
Calvocoressi L, Sun A, Kasl SV, Claus EB, Jones BA,. Mammography screening to women in their 40s: impact to changes in screening guidelines. Cancer. 2008; 112: 413-480.
-
(2008)
Cancer
, vol.112
, pp. 413-480
-
-
Calvocoressi, L.1
Sun, A.2
Kasl, S.V.3
Claus, E.B.4
Jones, B.A.5
-
20
-
-
77955635233
-
Cancer statistics
-
2010.
-
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu I, Ward E,. Cancer statistics. 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 277-300.
-
(2010)
CA Cancer J Clin
, vol.60
, pp. 277-300
-
-
Jemal, A.1
Siegel, R.2
Xu, I.3
Ward, E.4
|