A problem frame-based approach to evolvability: The case of the multi-translation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6662 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 157-175

  Reggio, Gianna ^a   Astesiano, Egidio ^a   Ricca, Filippo ^a   Leotta, Maurizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS; EVOLVABILITY; LARGE CLASS; PROBLEM FRAMES; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; UNPREDICTABLE CHANGES;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; VERIFICATION; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

SOFTWARE DESIGN; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 79959973544     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21292-5_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Knowledge Structuring and Representation in Requirement Specification. In: Proceedings 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 143-150. ACM Press, New York (2002)
2. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Towards a well-founded UML-based development method. In: 1st International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, Brisbane, Australia, September 22-27 (2003)
3. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Tight Structuring for Precise UML-Based Requirement Specifications. In:Wirsing, M., Knapp, A., Balsamo, S. (eds.) RISSEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2941, pp. 16-34. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
4. Bastani, B.: A requirements analysis framework for open systems requirements engineering. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 32(2), 47-55 (2007)
5. Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)
6. Boness, K., Harrison, R.: Goal sketching: Towards agile requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, Cap Esterel, pp. 71-77 (2007)
7. Brcina, R., Bode, S., Riebisch, M.: Optimization process for maintaining evolvability during software evolution. In: IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, pp. 196-205 (2009)
8. Breivold, H.P.: Software Architecture evolution and software evolvability, PhD thesis. Mälardalen University Press Licentiate Theses No. 97 (2009)
9. Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI). Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) (2004), http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/BPMN%20V1- 0%20May%203%202004.pdf (website, last access December 13, 2007)
10. Choppy, C., Reggio, G.: A UML-Based Approach for Problem Frame Oriented Software Development. Journal of Information and Software Technology (2005)
11. Choppy, C., Reggio, G.: Requirements capture and specification for enterprise applications: a UML based attempt. In: Han, J., Staples, M. (eds.) Proc. ASWEC 2006, pp. 19-28. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006) (Pubitemid 44592136)
12. Clements, P., Bass, L., Kazman, R., Abowd, G.: Predicting software quality by architecture-level evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software Quality, Austin, Texas, vol. 5, pp. 485-497. Software Engineering Institute (1995)
13. Erl, T.: SOA Principles of Service Design. The Prentice Hall Service-Oriented Computing Series from Thomas Erl (2007)
14. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, New York (1997)
15. Jackson, M.: Problem Frames: Analyzing and Structuring Software Development Problems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)
16. Kazman, R., Abowd, G., Bass, L., Clements, P.: Scenario-based analysis of software architecture. IEEE Software 13(6), 47-55 (1996), doi:10.1109/52.542294
17. Moore, K.E., Kirshenbaum, E.R.: Building Evolvable Systems: The ORBlite Project (1997), http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/97feb/feb97a9.pdf (website, last access November 7, 2010)
18. Leotta, M., Ricca, F., Reggio, G., Astesiano, E.: Comparing the maintainability of two alternative architectures of a postal system: SOA vs. non-SOA. In: Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2011), Oldenburg, Germany, March 1-4, pp. 317-320 (2011), DOI: http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/CSMR.2011.41
19. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM 15, 1053-1058 (1972)
20. Parnas, D.L.: Software aging. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 279-287. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)
21. Schmidt, V.A.: Using service oriented architecture for evolvable software systems. In: 11th International Command and Control Technology Symposium (2006)
22. Shiri, M., Hassine, J., Rilling, J.: A requirement level modification analysis support framework. In: IEEE International Workshop on Software Evolvability, pp. 67-74 (2007)