Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance

Policy Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-94

  Edelenbos, Jurian ^a   van Schie, Nienke ^a   Gerrits, Lasse ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; Democracy; Governance; Interactive policy making; Interconnection; Interface

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION;

EID: 76549130408     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9086-2     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management; new strategies for local governments. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
2. Alkin, M. C. (1990). Debates on evaluation. London: Sage.
3. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Busenberg, G. J. (1999). Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy. Policy Sciences, 32, 1-11. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1004414605851.
5. Castells, M. (2000, first edition 1996). The rise of the network society: Economy, society and culture. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
6. Caswill, C., & Shove, E. (2000). Introducing interactive social science. Science & Public Policy, 27(3), 154-157. doi: 10. 3152/147154300781781968.
7. DeSario, J., & Langton, S. (1986). Citizen participation in public decision making. New York: Greenwood Press.
8. Edelenbos, J. (2000) Proces in vorm: procesbegeleiding van interactieve beleidsvorming over lokale ruimtelijke projecten. PhD thesis. Lemma, Utrecht.
9. Edelenbos, J. (2004). Political dimensions of interactive policy-making: New forms of interactive politics. In V. Bekkers (Ed.), Steering in the social sector (in Dutch) (pp. 10-26). The Hague: Kluwer.
10. Edelenbos, J. (2005). Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance: An international Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 18(1), 111-134.
11. Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2007). Trust in complex decision-making networks: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration and Society, 39(1), 25-50.
12. Edelenbos, J., Klok, P-J, & van Tatenhove, J. (2009). The institutional embedding of interactive policy making. Insights from a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 125-148.
13. Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (Eds.). (2001). Local interactive policy development. Utrecht: Lemma (in Dutch).
14. Ehrmann, J. R., & Stinson, B. L. (1999). Joint fact-finding and the use of technical experts. In S. Susskind, S. McKearnan, & J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.), The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement (pp. 375-400). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15. Elden, M., & Levin, M. (1991). Cogenerative learning. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 127-142). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts and the environment. The politics of local knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
17. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Power & rationality. Democracy in practice. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research. Social research for social change. London: Sage.
19. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: MacMillan.
20. Hirst, P. (1997). From statism to pluralism: Democracy, civil society and global politics. London: University College London Press.
21. Hisschemöller, M. (1993). De democratie van problemen. De relatie tussen de inhoud van beleidsproblemen en methoden van politieke besluitvorming. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
22. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412-423. doi: 10. 1080/01944369908976071.
23. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. King, L. A. (2003). Deliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy. Governance, 16, 23-50. doi: 10. 1111/1468-0491. t01-1-00203.
25. Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks; foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135-158. doi: 10. 1080/146166700411201.
26. Klijn, E. H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3), 587-609. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9299. 2007. 00662. x.
27. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
28. Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
29. Lowndes, V., Pratchet, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 1 local government perspectives. Public Administration, 76(2), 205-222. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9299. 00253.
30. MacPherson, C. (1979). The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
32. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
33. Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (2005). Interactive policy development: Undermining or sustaining democracy. Public Administration, 83(1), 179-199.
34. McLaverty, P. (Ed.). (2002). Public participation and innovations in community governance. Ashgate: Aldershot.
35. Meier, K. J., & O'Toole, L. J. (2001). Managerial strategies and behaviour in networks: A model with evidence from U. S. public education. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 3(11), 271-293.
36. Milward, H., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 10(2), 359-379.
37. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding government. Buckingham: Open University Press.
38. Rinaudo, J. D., & Garin, P. (2005). The benefits of combining lay and expert input for water-management planning at the watershed level. Water Policy, 7, 279-293.
39. Sabatier, P. A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (Eds.). (2005). Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play; actor centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder (Co): Westview Press.
41. Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.) (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict. New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington: Resources for the future.
42. Sørenson, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(4), 693-720.
43. Sørenson, E. (2005). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114. doi: 10. 1177/0275074005282584.
44. Sørenson, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114. doi: 10. 1177/0275074005282584.
45. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2003). Network politics, political capital and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(6), 609-634. doi: 10. 1081/PAD-120019238.
46. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of network governance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195-218. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9477. 2005. 00129. x.
47. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
48. Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action research. A handbook for practitioners. London: Sage Publications.
49. Verweij, M., & Josling, T. E. (2003). Special issue: Deliberately democratizing multilateral organization. Governance, 16, 1-21. doi: 10. 1111/1468-0491. t01-1-00202.
50. Wadsworth, Y. (2001). Becoming responsive-and some consequences for evaluation as dialogue across distance. New Directions for Evaluation, 92, 45-58. doi: 10. 1002/ev. 34.
51. Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17-50. doi: 10. 1177/0275074006296208.
52. Woolgar, S. (2000). Social basis of interactive social science. Science & Public Policy, 27(3), 165-173. doi: 10. 3152/147154300781782039.