Scientific production and impact of national registers: The example of orthopaedic national registers

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 858-863

  Boyer, P ^a,b,c,d   Boutron, I ^b,c,d   Ravaud, P ^b,c,d  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

Author keywords

Citation; Meta analysis; Prosthesis; Randomized controlled trial; Register

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CITATION ANALYSIS; FINLAND; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; ITALY; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGISTER; SLOVAKIA; SWEDEN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES;

EID: 79959936160     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sox H.C., Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the institute of medicine. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:203-205.
2. Ergina P.L., Cook J.A., Blazeby J.M., Boutron I., Clavien P.A., Reeves B.C., et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009, 374:1097-1104.
3. McCulloch P., Altman D.G., Campbell W.B., Flum D.R., Glasziou P., Marshall J.C., et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009, 374:1105-1112.
4. Rawlins M. De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Lancet 2008, 372:2152-2161.
5. Herberts P., Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:111-121.
6. Victor J. Do we need a national arthroplasty register?. Acta Orthop Belg 2006, 72:521-523.
7. Kolling C., Simmen B.R., Labek G., Goldhahn J. Key factors for a successful national arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1567-1573.
8. Lucht U. The Danish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:433-439.
9. Garellick G., Malchau H., Herberts P. Survival of hip replacements. A comparison of a randomized trial and a registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 157-167.
10. Robertsson O., Dunbar M.J., Knutson K., Lewold S., Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. 25 years experience. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999, 58:133-138.
11. Vucovich L.A., Baker J.B., Smith J.T. Analyzing the impact of an author's publications. J Med Libr Assoc 2008, 96:63-66.
12. Nieminen P., Carpenter J., Rucker G., Schumacher M. The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:42.
13. Patsopoulos N.A., Analatos A.A., Ioannidis J.P. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA 2005, 293:2362-2366.
14. Greenberg S.A. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ 2009, 339:b2680.
15. Ioannidis J.P. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005, 2:e124.
16. Pitto R.P., Lang I., Kienapfel H., Willert H.G. The German arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2002, 73:30-33.
17. Puolakka T.J., Pajamaki K.J., Halonen P.J., Pulkkinen P.O., Paavolainen P., Nevalainen J.K. The Finnish arthroplasty register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:433-441.
18. Rahme H., Jacobsen M.B., Salomonsson B. The Swedish elbow arthroplasty register and the Swedish shoulder arthroplasty register: two new Swedish arthroplasty registers. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:107-112.
19. Labek G, Stöckl B, Janda W, Hudblacbl M, Thaler M, Liebensteimer M, et al. Quality of Datasets EFORT 2009 http://www.ear.efort.org/.
20. Ahnfelt L., Andersson G., Herberts P. [Re-operation of total hip arthroplasties]. Lakartidningen 1980, 77:2604-2607.
21. Bhandari M., Busse J., Devereaux P.J., Montori V.M., Swiontkowski M., Tornetta Iii P., et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg 2007, 50:119-123.
22. Boutron I., Ravaud P., Nizard R. The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:858-863.
23. Petersen M.K., Andersen K.V., Andersen N.T., Soballe K. "To whom do the results of this trial apply?" External validity of a randomized controlled trial involving 130 p.tients scheduled for primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:12-18.
24. Rothwell P.M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet 2005, 365:82-93.
25. Robertsson O., Lewold S., Knutson K., Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty project. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:7-18.
26. Serra-Sutton V., Allepuz A., Espallargues M., Labek G., Pons J.M. Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009, 25:63-72.
27. Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009, 374:86-89.
28. Havelin L.I., Fenstad A.M., Salomonsson R., Mehnert F., Furnes O., Overgaard S., et al. The Nordic arthroplasty register association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009, 80:393-401.
29. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., Garellick G., Soderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl 2):2-20.
30. Solomon M.J., Laxamana A., Devore L., McLeod R.S. Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Surgery 1994, 115:707-712.
31. Weale A.R., Bailey M., Lear P.A. The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:14.
32. Franks A.L., Simoes E.J., Singh R., Sajor Gray B. Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006, 30:211-216.