Secular decreases in fracture rates 1986-2006 for Manitoba, Canada: A population-based analysis

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2137-2143

  Leslie, W D ^a   Sadatsafavi, M ^b   Lix, L M ^c   Azimaee, M ^a   Morin, S ^d   Metge, C J ^a   Caetano, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Administrative data; Epidemiology; Fracture; Historical cohort study; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; FEMALE; FOREARM FRACTURE; FRACTURE; HIGH TRAUMA FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; LOW TRAUMA FRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPINE FRACTURE; TREND STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOREARM INJURIES; FRACTURES, BONE; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; HUMERAL FRACTURES; MALE; MANITOBA; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 79959930814     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1470-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. NE Lane 2006 Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 2 Suppl S3 S11 16448873 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.047 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVamtLk%3D (Pubitemid 43152482)
2. O Johnell JA Kanis 2006 An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures Osteoporos Int 17 12 1726 1733 16983459 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nitVSksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44607392)
3. C Berger D Goltzman L Langsetmo L Joseph N Kreiger A Tenenhouse, et al. 2010 Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 25 1948 1957 20499378 10.1002/jbmr.95
4. SH Gehlbach JS Avrunin E Puleo 2007 Trends in hospital care for hip fractures Osteoporos Int 18 5 585 591 17146592 10.1007/s00198-006-0281-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7ptFGquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46525536)
5. A Icks B Haastert M Wildner C Becker G Meyer 2008 Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study Osteoporos Int 19 8 1139 1145 18087659 10.1007/s00198-007-0534-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvisF2mtQ%3D%3D
6. P Kannus S Niemi J Parkkari M Palvanen I Vuori M Jarvinen 2006 Nationwide decline in incidence of hip fracture J Bone Miner Res 21 12 1836 1838 17002578 10.1359/jbmr.060815 (Pubitemid 44851558)
7. LJ Melton EJ Atkinson R Madhok 1996 Downturn in hip fracture incidence Public Health Rep 11 2 146 150 (Pubitemid 126565290)
8. LJ Melton AE Kearns EJ Atkinson ME Bolander SJ Achenbach JM Huddleston, et al. 2008 Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence Osteoporos Int 20 5 687 694 18797813 10.1007/s00198-008-0742-8
9. WD Leslie S O'Donnell S Jean C Lagacé P Walsh C Bancej, et al. 2009 Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada JAMA 302 8 883 889 19706862 10.1001/jama.2009.1231 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVCjur%2FK
10. R Eastell DM Reid J Compston C Cooper I Fogelman RM Francis, et al. 2001 Secondary prevention of osteoporosis: when should a non-vertebral fracture be a trigger for action? QJM 94 11 575 597 11704688 10.1093/qjmed/94.11.575 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnosFyrsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33100207)
11. JR Center TV Nguyen D Schneider PN Sambrook JA Eisman 1999 Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study Lancet 353 9156 878 882 10093980 10.1016/S0140-6736(98) 09075-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ptFOlug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29126875)
12. C Pike HG Birnbaum M Schiller H Sharma R Burge ET Edgell 2010 Direct and indirect costs of non-vertebral fracture patients with osteoporosis in the US Pharmacoeconomics 28 5 395 409 20402541 10.2165/11531040-000000000-00000
13. N Shi K Foley G Lenhart E Badamgarav 2009 Direct healthcare costs of hip, vertebral, and non-hip, non-vertebral fractures Bone 45 6 1084 1090 19664735 10.1016/j.bone.2009.07.086
14. KJ Obrant U Bengnér O Johnell BE Nilsson I Sernbo 1989 Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations? Calcif Tissue Int 44 3 157 167 2493320 10.1007/BF02556558 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ltFSrug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19076622)
15. C Cooper EJ Atkinson M Kotowicz WM O'Fallon LJ Melton 1992 Secular trends in the incidence of postmenopausal vertebral fractures Calcif Tissue Int 51 2 100 104 1422947 10.1007/BF00298496 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FksFKrtQ%3D%3D
16. LJ Melton PC Amadio CS Crowson WM O'Fallon 1998 Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures Osteoporos Int 8 4 341 348 10024904 10.1007/s001980050073 (Pubitemid 28418268)
17. J Oskam J Kingma HJ Klasen 1998 Fracture of the distal forearm: epidemiological developments in the period 1971-1995 Injury 29 5 353 355 9813678 10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00212-X 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjtFahsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28344723)
18. B Jónsson U Bengnér I Redlund-Johnell O Johnell 1999 Forearm fractures in Malmö, Sweden. Changes in the incidence occurring during the 1950s, 1980s and 1990s Acta Orthop Scand 70 2 129 132 10366911 10.3109/17453679909011249 (Pubitemid 29221715)
19. LJ Melton CS Crowson WM O'Fallon 1999 Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time Osteoporos Int 9 1 29 37 10367027 10.1007/s001980050113 (Pubitemid 29086162)
20. NP Roos E Shapiro 1999 Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system Med Care 37 6 Suppl JS10 JS14 10409002 10.1097/00005650-199906001-00005 1:STN:280: DyaK1MzhsVOjtQ%3D%3D
21. LL Roos NP Roos SM Cageorge JP Nicol 1982 How good are the data? Reliability of one health care data bank Med Care 20 3 266 276 7078285 10.1097/00005650-198203000-00003 (Pubitemid 12077083)
22. LL Roos S Gupta R Soodeen L Jebamani 2005 Data quality in an information-rich environment: Canada as an example Can J Aging 24 Suppl 1 153 170 16080132 10.1353/cja.2005.0055 (Pubitemid 40910640)
23. LL Roos JP Nicol 1999 A research registry: uses, development, and accuracy J Clin Epidemiol 52 1 39 47 9973072 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00126-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jslemtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29064272)
24. Statistics Canada. Population urban and rural, by province and territory [Internet]. [cited 2010 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/ cst01/demo62h-eng.htm?searchstrdisabled=manitoba%20population%201986& filename=demo62h.htm&lan=eng
25. JA Kanis P Delmas P Burckhardt C Cooper D Torgerson 1997 Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 7 4 390 406 9373575 10.1007/BF01623782 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FktV2jtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27346422)
26. McCulloch C, Searle S (2001) Generalized, linear, and mixed models. Wiley, New York
27. S Zeger K Liang P Albert 1989 Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach Biometrics 45 1 347 10.2307/2532076
28. Fox J (1998) Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
29. B Abrahamsen P Vestergaard 2010 Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997-2006 Osteoporos Int 21 3 373 380 19436931 10.1007/s00198-009-0957-3 1:STN:280: DC%2BC3c%2FovFClsQ%3D%3D
30. P Kannus M Palvanen S Niemi H Sievänen J Parkkari 2009 Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007 Bone 44 4 656 659 19135560 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.007
31. M Palvanen P Kannus S Niemi J Parkkari 2010 Secular trends in distal humeral fractures of elderly women: nationwide statistics in Finland between 1970 and 2007 Bone 46 1355 1358 19945550 10.1016/j.bone.2009.11.025
32. P Kannus M Palvanen S Niemi J Parkkari M Jarvinen 2008 Stabilizing incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people Finnish statistics in 1970-2006 and prediction for the future Bone 43 2 340 342 18538645 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.015
33. JL Kelsey EJ Samelson 2009 Variation in risk factors for fractures at different sites Curr Osteoporos Rep 7 4 127 133 19968916 10.1007/s11914-009- 0022-3
34. RS Stafford RL Drieling AL Hersh 2004 National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988-2003 Arch Intern Med 164 14 1525 1530 15277283 10.1001/archinte.164.14.1525 (Pubitemid 38970472)
35. SB Jaglal I Weller M Mamdani G Hawker H Kreder L Jaakkimainen, et al. 2005 Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 20 6 898 905 15883628 10.1359/JBMR.041231 (Pubitemid 40712812)
36. L Zhao H Jiang CJ Papasian D Maulik B Drees J Hamilton, et al. 2008 Correlation of obesity and osteoporosis: effect of fat mass on the determination of osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 23 1 17 29 17784844 10.1359/jbmr.070813 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVCmtL4%3D
37. D Zingmond L Melton S Silverman 2004 Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000 Osteoporos Int 15 8 603 610 15004666 10.1007/s00198-004-1592-7 (Pubitemid 39121107)
38. WD Leslie S O'Donnell C Lagacé P Walsh C Bancej S Jean, et al. 2010 Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons Osteoporos Int 21 1317 1322 19802507 10.1007/s00198-009-1080-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cnkslSltQ%3D%3D