A prospective, randomized trial comparing the Vienna nomogram to an eight-core prostate biopsy protocol

BJU International

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 204-208

  Lecuona, Angus ^a   Heyns, Chris F ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; Vienna nomogram

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSURIA; EIGHT CORE PROSTATE BIOPSY; EJACULATION DISORDER; FEVER; HEMATOCHEZIA; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NOMOGRAM; ORGAN SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; URINE RETENTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; ORGAN SIZE; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79959922955     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09887.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL,. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199-203 (Pubitemid 26414957)
2. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B, Blanc E, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L,. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000; 164: 393-6 (Pubitemid 30481933)
3. Djavan B, Zlotta A, Remzi M, et al,. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men. J Urol 2000; 163: 1144-9 (Pubitemid 30169380)
4. Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS, Perlmutter AP, Byrne JC, Vaughn ED Jr,. The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. Urology 1995; 46: 831-6
5. Remzi M, Djavan B, Wammack R, et al,. Can total and transition zone volume of the prostate determine whether to perform a repeat biopsy? Urology 2003; 61: 161-6 (Pubitemid 36151734)
6. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL,. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 2000; 163: 158-62
7. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM,. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 2001; 166: 86-91; discussion 91-2 (Pubitemid 32565349)
8. Remzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M, et al,. The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol 2005; 174: 1256-61
9. McNeal JE,. Origin and development of carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1969; 23: 24-34
10. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA,. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71-5 (Pubitemid 19184006)
11. Stamey TA,. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995; 45: 2-12
12. Pelzer AE, Bektic J, Berger AP, et al,. Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the Tyrol screening project. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 916-21 (Pubitemid 41641635)
13. Philip J, Ragavan N, Desouza J, Foster CS, Javle P,. Effect of peripheral biopsies in maximising early prostate cancer detection in 8-, 10- or 12-core biopsy regimens. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1218-20 (Pubitemid 38823939)
14. Presti JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K,. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163-7
15. Inahara M, Suzuki H, Kojima S, et al,. Improved prostate cancer detection using systematic 14-core biopsy for large glands with normal digital rectal examination findings. Urology 2006; 68: 815-19 (Pubitemid 44633386)
16. Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L, Rabets JC, Zippe CD, Magi-Galluzzi C,. Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006; 175: 485-8 (Pubitemid 43067334)
17. Guichard G, Larré S, Gallina A, et al,. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 430-5 (Pubitemid 46963444)
18. Descazeaud A, Rubin M, Chemama S, et al,. Saturation biopsy protocol enhances prediction of pT3 and surgical margin status on prostatectomy specimen. World J Urol 2006; 24: 676-80 (Pubitemid 44896709)
19. Walz J, Graefen M, Chun FK, et al,. High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 498-505 (Pubitemid 44189057)
20. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, Schulman C, Rigatti P, Montorsi F,. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 1309-22 (Pubitemid 47446019)
21. Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Crissman JD, et al,. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 cases. In Vivo 1994; 8: 439-43
22. Bangma CH, Roemeling S, Schröder FH,. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer. World J Urol 2007; 25: 3-9
23. Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, et al,. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 838-9
24. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB,. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994; 271: 368-74 (Pubitemid 24037911)
25. Dall'Era MA, Cooperberg MR, Chan JM, et al,. Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer 2008; 112: 1650-9
26. O'Donnell H, Parker C,. What is low-risk cancer and what is its natural history? World J Urol 2008; 26: 415-22
27. Paul R, Schöler S, van Randenborgh H, Kübler H, Alschibaja M, Busch R,. Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region? Eur Urol 2004; 45: 450-6