Fuzzy AHP based decision support system for technology selection in abrasive water jet cutting processes;Sustav potpore neizrazitom AHP utemeljenom odluĉivanju u izboru tehnologije u procesu rezanja abrazivnim vodenim mlazom

Tehnicki Vjesnik

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 187-191

  Tozan, Hakan ^a  

^a Turkish Naval Academy   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Abrasivewaterjet; FuzzyAHP; Mutli criteria decisionmaking

Indexed keywords

ABRASIVE WATERJET CUTTING; ABRASIVEWATERJET; APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES; CUTTING PROCESS; DECISION SUPPORTS; FUZZY AHP; MUTLI-CRITERIA DECISIONMAKING; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION;

ABRASIVES; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CUTTING TOOLS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; JETS; TECHNOLOGY; TITANIUM;

ABRASIVE CUTTING;

EID: 79959917941     PISSN: 13303651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Valíček, J., Hloch, S., Kozak, D. Surface geometric parameters proposal for the advanced control of abrasive waterjet technology. International Journal of Advanced ManufacturingTechnology, 41, 3-4(2009), 323-328.
2. Hloch, S. et al. Experimental study of surface topography created by abrasive waterjet cutting. Strojarstvo, 49, 4(2008), 303-309. ISSN 0562-1887.
3. Valicek, J.; Hloch, S. Using the acoustic sound pressure level for quality prediction of surfaces created by abrasive waterjet. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48, 1-4(2010), 193-203.
4. Hreha, P. et al. Waterjet technology used in medicine Tehnicki vjesnik-Technical gazette 17 (2010), 237-24
5. Valíček, J.; Hloch, S. Optical measurement of surface and topographical parameters investigation created by Abrasive Waterjet. International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, 3,4(2009), 347-359.
6. Cho, K. T. Multicriteria decision methods: An attempt to evaluate and unity. Mathematical and computer modeling, 37,(2003), 1099-1119.
7. Chantrasa, R. Decision making approaches for sharing information in supply chains. PhD. thesis, Clemson University(2005).
8. Anagnostopoulos, K. et al. A linguistic multi-criteria analysis system combining fuzzy sets theory, ideal and anti-ideal points for location site selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, (2008), 2041-2048.
9. Saaty, et al. MarketingApplications oftheAnalytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26, (1980), 641-658.
10. Simunovic, K. et al. Application of different quantitative techniques to inventory classification. Technical Gazette, 15, 4(2008), pp. 41-47.
11. Takala, J. et al. How to communicate and implement strategies in a strong organizational culture? Technical Gazette, 13,4(2006), pp.49-55.
12. Vargas L. G. An overview of the AHP and its applications. // European journal of operational research, 48, (1990), 2-8.
13. Turgut, B. T. et al. Fuzzy AHP based decision support system for disaster center location selection and a case study for Istanbul. Disaster prevention and management (accepted in Nov. 2010, waiting for publication.)
14. Tozan, H. et al. Fuzzy Forecasting Applications on Supply Chains WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 7, (2008), 600-609.
15. Tozan, H. et al. A fuzzy prediction based trajectory estimation. WSEAS Transactions on Systems (2010) 9: 885-894.
16. C. Fuzzy applications in industrial engineering. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, 201, (2006), Springer Verlag, NJ USA.g
17. Zadeh, L. A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, (1965), pp. 338-353.
18. Hloch, S.; Valicek, J.; Simkulet, V. Estimation of the smooth zone maximal depth at surfaces created by Abrasive Waterjet. International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, 3, (2009), pp. 347-359
19. Kahraman, C. et al. A SWOT-AHP application using fuzzy concept: E-Government in Turkey. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, theory and applications with recent developments, Kahraman C. (Ed.) (2008), Springer, NY, pp. 85-118.
20. Saaty, T. L. et al. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process Applied Mathematics, 11,4(1998), pp. 121-125.
21. Vijayvargiya, A. et al. An analytical approachforselectionof a logistics provider. Management Decision, 48, (2010), pp. 403-418.
22. Lee, S. K. et al. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector. International journal of hydrogen energy, 33 (2008) pp. 6840-6848.
23. Saaty, T. L. Decision Making for Leaders. RWS Publications, (1995), Pittsburgh.
24. Shin, K. C. O. et al. Applying the analytic hierarchy process to evaluation of the national nuclear R&D projects: The case of Korea. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 49, (2007), pp. 375-384.
25. Cakir, E. et al. A method for selecting third party logistic service provider using fuzzy AHP. Journal of naval science and engineering, 5, 3(2009), pp.35-54.
26. Chang, D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal ofOperational Research, 95, (1996), pp. 649-655.
27. Tabari, M. et al. Anew method for location selection: Ahybrid analysis. Applied mathematics and computation, 206, (2008), pp. 598-606.