Applying the analytic hierarchy process to evaluation of the national nuclear R&D projects: The case of Korea

Progress in Nuclear Energy

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 375-384

  Shin, Chul Oh ^a   Yoo, Seung Hoon ^b   Kwak, Seung Jun ^c  

^a Korea Maritime Institute   (South Korea)

^b Hoseo University   (South Korea)

^c Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Decision making; National R D project; Project evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS;

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PROJECT EVALUATION; STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34547585978     PISSN: 01491970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akash B.A., Mamlook R., and Mohsen M.S. Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process. Electric Power Systems Research 52 1 (1999) 29-35
2. Al-Harbi K.A. Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management 19 1 (2001) 19-27
3. Bender A., Din A., Hoesli M., and Brocher S. Environmental preferences of homeowners: further evidence using the AHP method. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 18 4 (2000) 445-455
4. Caporaletti L.E., Dulá J.H., and Womer N.K. Performance evaluation based on multiple attributes with nonparametric frontiers. Omega 27 6 (1999) 637-645
5. Chin K.-S., Pun K.-F., Xu Y., and Chan J.S.F. An AHP based study of critical factors for TQM implementation in Shanghai manufacturing industries. Technovation 22 11 (2002) 707-715
6. Davis L., and Williams G. Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 5 1 (1994) 23-32
7. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29 4-5 (2000) 657-678
8. Israeli A.A., Mehrez A., Bochen D., and Hakim D. Justification of global positioning systems purchase using the analytic hierarchical process: the case of the Israeli defense force. Technovation 18 6-7 (1998) 409-424
9. Lee M., Son B., and Om K. Evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea. Research Policy 25 5 (1996) 805-818
10. Marshall K.T., and Oliver R.M. Decision Making and Forecasting: With Emphasis on Model Building and Policy Analysis (1995), McGraw-Hill, New York
11. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). 2000 White Paper (2000), MOST, Kwachon, Korea
12. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). Evaluation systems of the national R&D Programme in Korea (2000), MOST, Kwachon, Korea
13. Ossadnik W., and Lange O. AHP-based evaluation of AHP-software. European Journal of Operational Research 118 3 (1999) 578-588
14. Poh K.L., Ang B.W., and Bai F. A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods. R&D Management 31 1 (2001) 63-75
15. Rangone A. An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16 8 (1996) 104-119
16. Rengarajan S., and Jagannathan P. Project selection by scoring for a large R&D organization in a developing country. R&D Management 27 2 (1997) 155-164
17. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Saaty T.L. Decision Making for Leaders (1995), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
19. Saaty T.L., and Vargas L.G. Decision-making in Economics, Political, Social and Technological Environments (1994), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
20. Taylor III F.A., Ketcham A.F., and Hoffman D. Personal evaluation with AHP. Management Decision 36 10 (1998) 679-685
21. Udo G.G. Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision. Industrial Management & Data Systems 100 9 (2000) 421-429
22. Yang J., and Lee H. An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities 15 9-10 (1997) 241-254