An industrial case study on quality impact prediction for evolving service-oriented software

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 776-785

  Koziolek, Heiko ^a   Schlich, Bastian ^a   Bilich, Carlos ^a   Weiss, Roland ^a   Becker, Steffen ^c   Krogmann, Klaus ^b   Trifu, Mircea ^b   Mirandola, Raffaela ^d   Koziolek, Anne ^e  

^a ABB CORPORATE RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b FZI RESEARCH CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

^d POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^e KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

case study; dtmc; industrial software; lqn; palladio; performance prediction; reliability prediction; reverse engineering; service oriented software; trade off analysis

Indexed keywords

DTMC; INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE; LQN; PALLADIO; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; RELIABILITY PREDICTION; SERVICE ORIENTED; TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRY; RESEARCH; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

FORECASTING;

EID: 79959911405     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1985793.1985902     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 30(5):295-310, May 2004.
2. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison Wesley Professional, 2nd edition, 2003.
3. S. Becker, L. Bulej, T. Bures, P. Hnetynka, L. Kapova, J. Kofron, H. Koziolek, J. Kraft, R. Mirandola, J. Stammel, G. Tamburelli, and M. Trifu. Q-ImPrESS Project Deliverable D2.1: Service Architecture Meta Model (SAMM). Technical Report 1.0, Q-ImPrESS consortium, September 2008. http://bit.ly/ bfSGrh.
4. S. Becker, M. Hauck, M. Trifu, K. Krogmann, and J. Kofron. Reverse Engineering Component Models for Quality Predictions. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, European Projects Track, pages 199-202. IEEE, 2010.
5. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. The Palladio Component Model for Model-Driven Performance Prediction. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(1):3-22, 2009.
6. G. Franks, T. Al-Omari, M. Woodside, O. Das, and S. Derisavi. Enhanced Modeling and Solution of Layered Queueing Networks. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 35(2):148-161, 2009.
7. K. Goseva-Popstojanova, M. Hamill, and R. Perugupalli. Large empirical case study of architecture-based software reliability. In Proc. 16th IEEE Int. Symp. on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE'05), pages 43-52. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
8. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and A. Sabetta. Filling the gap between design and performance/reliability models of component-based systems: A model-driven approach. J. Syst. Softw., 80(4):528-558, 2007.
9. L. Hatvani, A. Jansen, C. Seceleanu, and P. Pettersson. An Integrated Tool for Trade-off Analysis of Quality-of-Service Attributes. In Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on the Quality of Service-oriented Software Systems (QUASOSS'10). ACM Digital Library, October 2010.
10. N. Huber, S. Becker, C. Rathfelder, J. Schweflinghaus, and R. H. Reussner. Performance modeling in industry: a case study on storage virtualization. In Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE'10), pages 1-10. ACM, 2010.
11. A. Immonen and E. Niemelä. Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Springer Software and System Modeling, 7(1):49-65, 2008. (Pubitemid 350186820)
12. S. Kounev. Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Distributed Component-Based Systems Using Queueing Petri Nets. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 32(7):486-502, 2006.
13. H. Koziolek. Performance Evaluation of Component-based Software Systems: A Survey. Performance Evaluation, 67(8):634-658, 2010.
14. H. Koziolek, J. Doppelhamer, R. Weiss, C. Bilich, B. Schlich, I. Skuliber, M. Zemljic, S. Desic, and D. Huljenic. Q-ImPrESS Project Deliverable D7.3: Demonstrator Results Documentation. Technical report, Q-ImPrESS consortium, October 2010.
15. H. Koziolek, B. Schlich, and C. Bilich. A Large-Scale Industrial Case Study on Architecture-based Software Reliability Analysis. In Proc. ISSRE'10. IEEE Computer Society, November 2010. To appear.
16. B. Littlewood and J. L. Verrall. A Bayesian Reliability Growth Model for Computer Software. Applied Statistics, 22(3):332, 1973.
17. A. Martens, H. Koziolek, S. Becker, and R. H. Reussner. Automatically improve software models for performance, reliability and cost using genetic algorithms. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Performance Engineering (ICPE'10), pages 105-116. ACM, February 2010.
18. M. Masetti, S. Becker, I. Skuliber, M. Hauck, J. Kofron, K. Krogmann, J. Stammel, C. Seceleanu, J. Tysiak, R. Mirandola, and D. Ardagna. Q-ImPrESS Project Deliverable D6.1: Method and abstract workflow. Technical report, Q-ImPrESS consortium, 2009.
19. S. McConnell. Code Complete: A practical handbook of software construction. Microsoft Press, Buffalo, NY, 1993.
20. D. A. Menasce, L. W. Dowdy, and V. A. Almeida. Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example. Prentice Hall, 2004.
21. N. Nagappan, T. Ball, and A. Zeller. Mining metrics to predict component failures. In Proc. 28th Int. Conf. on Softw. Eng. (ICSE'06), pages 452-461. ACM, 2006.
22. OMG. UML Profile for MARTE: Modeling and Analysis of Real-time Embedded Systems, November 2009. http://www.omg.org/spec/MARTE/.
23. OMG. Tools related to MARTE, October 2010. http://www.omgwiki.org/marte/ node/31.
24. R. Pietrantuono, S. Russo, and K. S. Trivedi. Software Reliability and Testing Time Allocation: An Architecture-Based Approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 36(3):323-337, 2010.
25. Q-ImPrESS Consortium. Project website. http://www.q-impress.eu.
26. T. L. Saaty. Multicriteria Decision Making - The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publishing, 2nd edition, 1990.
27. L. G. Williams and C. U. Smith. Making the business case for software performance engineering. In Proc. Int. CMG Conference, pages 349-358. Computer Measurement Group, 2003.
28. M. Woodside, G. Franks, and D. C. Petriu. The future of software performance engineering. In Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07), pages 171-187. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
29. L. Zhu, A. Aurum, I. Gorton, and R. Jeffery. Tradeoff and sensitivity analysis in software architecture evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. Software Quality Journal, 13(4):357-375, 2005. (Pubitemid 41651313)