Performance modeling in industry: A case study on storage virtualization

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-10

  Huber, Nikolaus ^a   Becker, Steffen ^b   Rathfelder, Christoph ^b   Schweflinghaus, Jochen ^c   Reussner, Ralf H ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FZI RESEARCH CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c IBM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SYSTEMS; COMPONENT MODEL; COST SAVING; DESIGN ALTERNATIVES; DESIGN DECISIONS; EARLY DESIGN STAGES; INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS; INDUSTRIAL USE; MODEL CALIBRATION; NON-FUNCTIONAL; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE BOTTLENECKS; PERFORMANCE MODELING; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; PROOF OF CONCEPT; RESEARCH AREAS; RESOURCE UTILIZATIONS; RESPONSE TIME; STORAGE VIRTUALIZATION; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN; FORECASTING; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRY; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; VIRTUAL STORAGE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 77954726976     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1810295.1810297     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. R. Andrej. Evaluation of the prediction approach "Palladio" in the industrial context of the CAS Software AG, 2008. Master's thesis (in German).
2. S. Balsamo, A. D. Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, 2004.
3. V. R. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. D. Rombach. The Goal Question Metric approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Wiley, 1994.
4. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. Journal of Sys. and Softw., 82:3-22, 2009.
5. J. Happe. Predicting Software Performance in Symmetric Multi-core and Multiprocessor Environments. PhD thesis, Univ. of Oldenburg, 2008.
6. N. Huber. Performance Modeling of Storage Virtualization. Master's thesis, University of Karlsruhe (TH), 2009.
7. R. K. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation and Modelling. John Wiley & Sons, April 1991.
8. S. Kounev. Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Distributed Component-Based Systems using Queueing Petri Nets. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(7):486-502, July 2006.
9. H. Koziolek. Performance evaluation of component-based software systems: A survey. Performance Evaluation, 2009.
10. K. Krogmann and R. H. Reussner. The Common Component Modeling Example, volume 5153 of LNCS, pages 297-326. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, '08.
11. K.-K. Lau. Software Component Models. In ICSE'06, pages 1081-1082. ACM Press, 2006.
12. A. Martens, S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. An Empirical Investigation of the Applicability of a Component-Based Performance Prediction Method. In EPEW'08, volume 5261 of LNCS, pages 17-31. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
13. Object Management Group (OMG). UML profile for schedulability, performance and time. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2005-01-02.
14. U. Praphamontripong, S. Gokhale, A. Gokhale, and J. Gray. Performance analysis of an asynchronous web server. COMPSAC '06, 2006.
15. U. Praphamontripong, S. Gokhale, A. Gokhale, and J. Gray. Performance analysis of a middleware demultiplexing pattern. In HICSS '07, 2007.
16. S. Ramesh and H. G. Perros. A multilayer client-server queueing network model with synchronous and asynchronous messages. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 26(11):1086-1100, 2000. (Pubitemid 33776030)
17. C. Smith and L. G. Williams. Performance solutions: a practical guide to creating responsive, scalable software. Addison Wesley, 2002.
18. C. U. Smith. Increasing information systems productivity by software performance engineering. In Int. CMG Conference, pages 5-14, 1981.
19. C. Szyperski, D. Gruntz, and S. Murer. Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. ACM Press and Addison-Wesley, 2002.
20. J. Wei, J. R. Jackson, and J. A. Wiegert. Towards Scalable and High Performance I/O virtualization - A Case Study. In HPCC '07, pages 586-598, 2007.
21. J. Wiegert, G. Regnier, and J. Jackson. Challenges for scalable networking in a virtualized server. ICCCN '07, pages 179-184, 2007.
22. L. G. Williams and C. U. Smith. Making the business case for software performance engineering. In 29th Int. CMG Conference, pages 349-358, 2003.
23. M. Woodside, G. Franks, and D. C. Petriu. The future of software performance engineering. In FOSE '07, pages 171-187, 2007.
24. M. Woodside, D. C. Petriu, D. B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer. Performance by unified model analysis (puma). In WOSP '05, 2005.