Chronic intermittent heroin produces locomotor sensitization and long-lasting enhancement of conditioned reinforcement

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 475-479

  Morrison, J ^a,b   Thornton, V ^a   Ranaldi, R ^a,b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned reinforcement; Drug addiction; Heroin; Locomotor sensitization; Protracted withdrawal; Rats

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG EXPOSURE; FOOD; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STIMULUS;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; HEROIN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS;

EID: 79959847232     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: 18735177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aston-Jones G, Harris GC. Brain substrates for increased drug seeking during protracted withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 2004;47:167-79. (Pubitemid 39298262)
2. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 1998;28:309-69.
3. Carlezon Jr WA, Nestler EJ. Elevated levels of GluR1 in the midbrain: a trigger for sensitization to drug of abuse. Trends Neurosci 2005;25:6729-33.
4. Carr KD. Chronic food restriction: enhancing effects on drug reward and striatal cell signaling. Physiol Behav 2007;91:459-72. (Pubitemid 47247778)
5. Chao J, Nestler EJ. Molecular neurobiology of drug addiction. Annu Rev Med 2004;55: 113-32. (Pubitemid 38316718)
6. Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ. Dissociable effects of antagonism of NMDA and AMPA/KA receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell on cocaine seeking behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;25:341-60. (Pubitemid 32777786)
7. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Amygdala-ventral striatal interactions and reward-related processes. In: Aggleton JP, editor. The amygdale. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1992. p. 401-30.
8. Fibiger HC, Phillips AG. Reward, motivation and cognition: psychobiology of mesotelencephalic dopamine systems. In: ZV, Bloom FE, Geiger SR, editors. Handbook of physiology: the nervous system. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 1986. p. 647-75.
9. Fitzgerald LW, Ortiz J, Hamedani AG, Nestler EJ. Drug of abuse and stress increase the expression of GluR1 and NMDAR1 glutamate receptor subunits in the rat ventral tagmental area: common adaptations among cross-sensitizing agents. J Neurosci 1996;16:274-82.
10. Harris GC, Aston-Jones G. Altered motivation and learning following opiate withdrawal: evidence for prolonged dysregulation of reward processing. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003a;28:865-71.
11. Harris GC, Aston-Jones G. Enhanced morphine preference following prolonged abstinence: association with increased fos expression in the enhanced amygdale. Neuropsychophamacology 2003b;28:292-9.
12. Ito R, Dalley JW, Howes SR, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Dissociation in conditioned dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core and shell in response to cocaine cues and during cocaine seeking behavior in rats. J Neurosci 2000;20:7489-95.
13. Ito R, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Differential control over cocaine-seeking behavior by nucleus accumbens core and shell. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:389-97. (Pubitemid 38429179)
14. Kalivas PW, Duffy P. Sensitization to repeated morphine injection in the rat: possible involvement of A10 neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987;241:204-12. (Pubitemid 17119361)
15. King GR, Joyner C, Elinwood Jr EH. Continuous or intermittent cocaine administration: effects of flupenthixol treatment during withdrawal. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994;49:883-9. (Pubitemid 24376025)
16. King GR, Joyner JC, Lee T, Kuhn C, Elinwood Jr EH. Intermittent and continuous cocaine administration: residual behavioral states during withdrawal. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1992;43:243-8.
17. Lee TH, Gee KR, Ellinwood EH, Seider FJ. Combining 'caged-dopamine' photolysis with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to assess dopamine clearance and release autoinhibition in vitro. J Neurosci Methods 1996;67:221-31.
18. Lee TH, Gee KR, Ellinwood EH, Seider FJ. Altered cocaine potency in the nucleus accumbens following 7-day withdrawal from intermittent but not continuous treatment: voltammetric assessment of dopamine uptake in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998;137:303-10. (Pubitemid 28277516)
19. Louk JM, Vanderschuren J, Guno HK, Tjon, Nestby P, Mulder AH, et al. Morphine-induced long-term sensitization to the locomotor effects of morphine and amphetamine depends on the temporal pattern of the pretreatment regimen. Psychopharmacology 1997;131:115-22. (Pubitemid 27261598)
20. Nestler EJ. Historical review: molecular and cellular mechanism of opiate and cocaine addiction. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004;25:210-8. (Pubitemid 38519912)
21. Pothos EN, Creese I, Hoebel BG. Restricted eating with weight loss selectively decreases extracellular dopamine response to amphetamine, morphine, and food intake. J Neurosci 1995;15(10):6640-50.
22. Ranaldi R, Egan J, Kest K, Fein M, Delamater AR. Repeated heroin in rats produces locomotor sensitization and enhances appetitive Pavlovian and instrumental learning involving food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009;91:351-7.
23. Ranaldi R, Munn E, Neklesa T, Wise RA. Morphine and amphetamine sensitization demonstrated under moderate-and high-dose NMDA receptor blockade with MK-801 (dizocilpine). Psychopharm 2000;151:192-201. (Pubitemid 30646422)
24. Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Functions of dopamine in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Semin. Neurosci. 1992;4:119-27.
25. Spanagel R, Almeida OF, Shippenberg TS. Long lasting changes in morphine-induced mesolimbic dopamine release after chronic morphine exposure. Synapse 1993;14: 243-5. (Pubitemid 23204950)
26. Spanagel R, Shippenberg TS. Modulation of morphine-induced sensitization by endogenous kappa opioid systems in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1993;153:232-6. (Pubitemid 23147077)
27. Taylor JR, Horger BA. Enhanced responding for conditioned reward produced by intraaccumbens amphetamine is potentiated after cocaine sensitization. Psychopharmacology 1999;142:31-40. (Pubitemid 29196061)
28. Taylor JR, Jentsch JD. Repeated intermittent administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs alters the acquisition of pavlovian approach behavior in rats: differential effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine and 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ectasy"). Biol Psychiatry 2001;15:137-43. (Pubitemid 32728213)
29. Wise RA. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Rev 2004;5:483-94. (Pubitemid 38715515)
30. Wise RA, Bozarth MA. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 1987;94:469-92.
31. Wolterink G, Phillps G, Cador M, Donselaar-Wolterink I, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Relative roles of bentral striatal d (1) and d (2) dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 1993;110:355-64. (Pubitemid 23051139)
32. Wyvell CL, Berridge KC. Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered "wanting" for sucrose reward. J Neurosci 2001;21: 7831-40.
33. Zellner MR, Ranaldi R. How conditioned stimuli acquire the ability to active VTA dopamine cells: a proposed neurobiological component of reward-related learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010;34:769-80.