Comprehending ambiguous texts: A high reading span helps to constrain the situation model

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 227-242

  Dutke, Stephan ^a   Von Hecker, Ulrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Reading span; Situation models; Text comprehension; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NARRATIVE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; READING SPAN;

EID: 79959842387     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.485127     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
2. Blanc, N., Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., & Brouillet, D. (2008). Updating situation models during reading of news reports: Evidence from empirical data and simulations. Discourse Processes, 45, 103-121.
3. Bornkessel, I. A., Fiebach, C. J., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: An individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 11-21. (Pubitemid 39119608)
4. Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory and Cognition, 23, 735-748.
5. Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2007). Aging and integrating spatial mental models. Psychology and Aging, 22, 569-579. (Pubitemid 47531917)
6. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
7. Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2001). Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 208-223. (Pubitemid 33595898)
8. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A metaanalysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433. (Pubitemid 126421538)
9. Dutke, S., Baadte, C, Hähnel, A., von Hecker, U, & Rinck, M. (2010). Using diagnostic text information to constrain situation models. Discourse Processes, 47, 510-544.
10. Engle, R. W, & Oransky, N. (1999). Multi-store versus dynamic models of temporary storage in memory. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 515-555). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M., & Engle, R. W (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553-573. (Pubitemid 38882636)
12. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory, constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193-221. (Pubitemid 28159587)
13. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313-339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Research, 4, 294-298.
15. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
16. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1995). Reading skill and suppression revisited. Psychological Research, 6, 165-169.
17. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
18. Graesser, A. C, Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395. (Pubitemid 24976808)
19. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
20. Hummert, M. L., Crockett, W. H., & Kemper, S. (1990). Processing mechanisms underlying use of the balance schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 5-21.
21. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418-439.
22. Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subjects designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115-134. (Pubitemid 33604034)
23. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
24. King, J, & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580-602.
25. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kintsch, W., & Mross, E. F. (1985). Context effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 8, 336-344.
27. La Pointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1118-1133.
28. Light, L. L., & Anderson, P. A. (1985). Workingmemory capacity, age, and memory for discourse. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 737-747. (Pubitemid 16235359)
29. MacDonald, M. C, Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56-98.
30. Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127. (Pubitemid 46551014)
31. McNamara, D., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 465-482. (Pubitemid 38317888)
32. Morrow, D. G, Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292-312.
33. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity-facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017-1045.
34. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167-193. (Pubitemid 36105312)
35. Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1073-1080. (Pubitemid 34169323)
36. Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2004). Working memory span and situation model processing. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 191-213. (Pubitemid 38882776)
37. Russell, J., & Taggart, A. (1995). One model or two? Sentence verification in children and adults. Educational Psychology, 15, 379-404. (Pubitemid 126010827)
38. Sedek, G., & von Hecker, U (2004). Effects of subclinical depression and aging on generative reasoning about linear orders: Same or different processing limitations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 237-260. (Pubitemid 38707133)
39. Vandierendonck, A., Dierckx, V., & de Vooght, G (2004). Mental model construction in linear reasoning: Evidence for the construction of initial annotated models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57 A, 1369-1391. (Pubitemid 39558226)
40. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
41. Van Oostendorp, H., Otero, J., & Campanario, J. M. (2002). Conditions of updating during reading. In M. Louwerse & W van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (Vol. 3, pp. 55-76). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Von Hecker, U (1997). How do logical rules help to construct social mental models? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 367-400. (Pubitemid 127340359)
43. Von Hecker, U, Crockett, W, Hummert, M. L., & Kemper, S. (1996). Social cliques as mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 741-749. (Pubitemid 126330873)
44. Von Hecker, U, & Dutke, S. (2004). Integrative social perception: Individuals low in working memory benefit more from external representations. Social Cognition, 22, 336-365. (Pubitemid 39057710)
45. Von Hecker, U, & Sedek, G. (1999). Uncontrollability, depression, and the construction of mental models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 833-850.
46. Whitney, P., Arnett, P. A., Driver, A., & Budd, D. (2001). Measuring central executive functioning: What's in a reading span? Brain and Cognition, 45, 1-14. (Pubitemid 32175093)
47. Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working-memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14, 133-145.
48. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOS [Computer software]. Retrieved October 27, 2002, from http://psych.umb.edu/rsvp
49. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.