Multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of historic structures based on the case of a masonry bridge in Galicia (Spain)

Computers and Structures

Volumn 89, Issue 17-18, 2011, Pages 1615-1627

  Lubowiecka, Izabela ^a   Arias, Pedro ^b   Riveiro, Belén ^b   Solla, Mercedes ^b  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Close range photogrammetry; Finite element method; Ground probing radar; Historic structures; Sensitivity analysis; Structural analysis

Indexed keywords

3D MODELS; CLOSE RANGE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY; COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS; GALICIA; GENERAL METHOD; GROUND PROBING RADAR; HISTORIC STRUCTURES; INTERNAL COMPOSITION; MASONRY STRUCTURES; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES;

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS; MASONRY BRIDGES; MASONRY MATERIALS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; RADAR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 79959823555     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. C. Szymczak, H. Walukiewicz, and A. Tomaszewska Application of structural dynamic methods in diagnosis of historic buildings P. Loureno, P. Roca, C. Modena, S. Agrawal, Proceedings of the 5th international conference structural analysis of historical constructions: possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques vol. 1 2006 Macmillan India Ltd. (Macmillan Advanced Research Series) New Delhi, India 537 544
2. A. Cointe, P. Castera, P. Morlier, and P. Galimard Diagnosis and monitoring of timber buildings of cultural heritage Struct Saf 29 2006 337 348 (Pubitemid 46865525)
3. Solla M, Lorenzo H, Rial FI, Novo A. GPR evaluation of the Roman masonry arch bridge of Lugo (Spain). NDT&E Int. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.08.004 [in press].
4. J.L. Rees, Y. Bisset, T. Lukins, C. Urquhart, H. Ravindranath, and R. Fisher 3D visualisation of skin lesions use in photogrammetry J Invest Dermatol 127 2007 S19
5. F. Samadzadegan, A. Azizi, M. Hahn, and C. Lucas Automatic 3D object recognition and reconstruction based on neuro-fuzzy modeling ISPRS J Photogr Remote Sens 59 2005 255 277 (Pubitemid 41009227)
6. P. Arias, C. Ordóñez, H. Lorenzo, J. Herráez, and J. Armesto Low-cost documentation of traditional agro-industrial buildings by close-range photogrammetry Build Environ 42 2007 1817 1827 (Pubitemid 44835409)
7. P. Arias, J. Herráez, H. Lorenzo, and C. Ordóñez Control of structural problems in cultural heritage monuments using close-range photogrammetry and computer methods Comput Struct 83 21-22 2005 1754 1766 (Pubitemid 40819695)
8. Lubowiecka I, Arias P, Armesto J. 3D photogrammetric modelling for FEM structural analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference modern building materials, structures and techniques, Vilnius, Lietuva; 2007. p. 1-6.
9. Pesci A, Casula G, Boschi E. Laser scanning the Garisenda and Asinelli towers in Bologna (Italy): detailed deformation patterns of two ancient leaning buildings. J Cult Heritage. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.01.002 [in press].
10. I. Lubowiecka, J. Armesto, P. Arias, and H. Lorenzo Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics Eng Struct 31 2009 2667 2676
11. P. Arias, J. Armesto, D. Di-Capua, R. González-Drigo, H. Lorenzo, and V. Pérez-Gracia Digital photogrammetry GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge Eng Fail Anal 14 8 2007 1444 1457 (Pubitemid 46959169)
12. G.A. Drosopoulos, G.E. Stavroulakis, and C.V. Massal Influence of the geometry and the abutments movement on the collapse of stone arch bridges Constr Build Mater 22 3 2008 200 210 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.001 (Pubitemid 350296891)
13. D.C. Brown Close-range camera calibration Photogr Eng 37 8 1971 855 866
14. T. Luhmann, S. Robson, K. Stephen, and I. Harley Close range photogrammetry: principles Methods and applications 2006 Whittles Publishing Scotland, UK
15. A.P. Annan Ground penetrating radar: principles, procedures and applications 2004 Sensors & Software Inc. Ontario
16. Frunzio G, Monaco M, Gesualdo A. 3D F.E.M. analysis of a roman arch bridge. In: Loureno PB, Roca P, editors. Historical constructions, Guimarães; 2001. p. 591-97. Available at < http://www.civil.uminho.pt/ masonry/Publications/Historical%20constructions/page%20591-598%20-69-.pdf >.
17. L. Binda, G. Lenzi, and A. Saisi NDE of masonry structures: use of radar tests for the characterization of stone masonries NDT&E Int 31 1998 411 419 (Pubitemid 128428325)
18. C. Colla, P.C. Dast, D. McCann, and M.C. Forde Sonic, electromagnetic and impulse radar investigation of stone masonry bridges NDT&E Int 30 4 1997 249 254 (Pubitemid 127381682)
19. Clark M, Forde M. Using conductivity to determine the location of moisture in a masonry arch bridge. In: International symposium on non-destructive testing in civil engineering; 2003. Available at < http://www.ndt.net/article/ndtce03/papers/v031/v031.htm >.
20. N. Diamanti, A. Giannopoulos, and M.C. Forde Numerical modeling and experimental verification of GPR to investigate ring separation in brick masonry arch bridges NDT&E Int 41 5 2008 354 363
21. J.W. Bull Computational modelling of masonry Brickwork and blockwork structures 2001 Saxe-Coburg Publications Stirling
22. J. Armesto, I. Lubowiecka, C. Ordóñez, and F.I. Rial FEM modeling of structures based on close range digital photogrammetry Autom Constr 18 2009 559 569
23. J. Heyman The masonry arch Ellis Horwood series in engineering science 1982 Ellis Horwood Ltd Chichester, England
24. M. Betti, G.A. Drosopoulos, and G.E. Stavroulakis Two non-linear finite element models developed for the assessment of failure of masonry arches CR Mécanique 336 1-2 2008 42 53 10.1016/j.crme.2007.10.014
25. Morer P, de Arteaga I, Armesto J, Arias P. Comparative structural analyses of masonry bridges: an application to the Cernadela Bridge. J Cult Heritage. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.01.006 [in press].
26. M. Girardi, C. Padovani, A. Pagni, and G. Pasquinelli Numerical modelling of the dynamic behaviour of masonry arches B.H.V. Topping, L.F. Costa Neves, R.C. Barros, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing 2009 Civil-Comp Press Stirlingshire, Scotland [paper 84]
27. P.J. Fanning, and T.E. Boothby Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges Comput Struct 79 2001 2645 2662 (Pubitemid 32997779)
28. J. Zeman, J. Novák, M. Šejnoha, and J. Šejnoha Pragmatic multi-scale and multiphysics analysis of Charles Bridge in Prague Eng Struct 30 2008 3365 3376
29. A. Cavicchi, and L. Gambarotta Collapse analysis of masonry bridges taking into account arch-fill interaction Eng Struct 27 2005 605 615 (Pubitemid 40355158)
30. L.E. Romera, S. Hernandez, and J.M. Reinosa Numerical characterization of the structural behaviour of the Basilica of Pilar in Zaragoza (Spain). Part 1: Global and local models Adv Eng Softw 39 2008 301 314 (Pubitemid 350297958)
31. L. Berto, A. Saetta, R. Scotta, and R. Vitaliani Shear behaviour of masonry panel: parametric FE analyses Int J Solids Struct 41 2004 4383 4405 (Pubitemid 38814624)
32. A. Brencich, and D. Sabia Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge Constr Build Mater 22 2008 2087 2099 (Pubitemid 351749809)
33. K.J. Bathe Finite element procedures 1996 Prentice Hall New Jersey
34. Y.S. Petryna, and W.B. Kraetzig Compliance-based structural damage measure and its sensitivity to uncertainties Comput Struct 83 2005 1113 1133 (Pubitemid 40423311)
35. C. Szymczak Elements of design theory 1998 PWN Warsaw [in Polish]
36. J.L. Chen, and J.S. Ho A comparative study of design sensitivity analysis by using commercial finite element programs Finite Elem Anal Des 15 1994 189 200
37. P. Iwicki Stability of truss with linear elastic side-supports Thin-Walled Struct 45 2007 849 854 (Pubitemid 350102721)