Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2667-2676

  Lubowiecka, Izabela ^a   Armesto, Julia ^b   Arias, Pedro ^b   Lorenzo, Henrique ^b  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Finite element method; Ground penetrating radar; Historic structures; Laser scanning; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX GEOMETRIES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GPR TECHNIQUES; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; GROUND PENETRATING RADARS; HISTORIC BRIDGES; HISTORIC STRUCTURES; LASER SCANNER; LASER SCANNING; MASONRY STRUCTURES; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NONINVASIVE METHODS; STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR; STRUCTURAL MODELS; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FOUNDATIONS; GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; LASER APPLICATIONS; LASERS; MASONRY MATERIALS; MODEL STRUCTURES; RADAR; RADAR ANTENNAS; SCANNING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

BRIDGE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; LASER METHOD; MASONRY; MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 70349771906     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lubowiecka I., Armesto J., Rial F.I., and Arias P. Masonry bridge FEM modelling based on Digital Photogrammetry and GPR tests. In: Topping B.H.V., and Papadrakakis M. (Eds). Proceedings of the ninth international conference on computational structures technology (2008), Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire (Scotland)
2. Zeman J., Novák J., Šejnoha M., and Šejnoha J. Pragmatic multi-scale and multi-physics analysis of Charles Bridge in Prague. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 3365-3376
3. Park H.S., Lee H.M., Adeli H., and Lee I. A new approach for health monitoring of structures: Terrestrial laser scanning. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 22 1 (2007) 19-30
4. Yastikli N. Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J Cultural Heritage 8 4 (2007) 423-427
5. Guidi G., Frischer B., Russo M., Spinetti A., Carosso L., and Micoli L. Three-dimensional acquisition of large and detailed cultural heritage objects. Mach Vis Appl 17 6 (2006) 349-360
6. Bolliger S.A., Thali M.J., Ross S., Buck U., Naether S., and Vock P. Virtual autopsy imaging: Bridging radiologic and forensic sciences, A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. European Radiol 18 (2008) 273-282
7. Barber D., Mills J., and Smith-Voysey S. Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sensing 63 1 (2008) 128-141
8. Abellán A., Vilaplana J.M., and Martínez J. Application of a long-range Terrestrial Laser Scanner to a detailed rockfall study at Vall de Núria (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Eng Geol 88 (2008) 136-148
9. Kang D.S., Lee H.M., Park H.S., and Lee I. Computing method for estimating strain and stress of steel beams using terrestrial laser scanning and FEM. Key Engineering Materials 347 (2007) 517-522
10. Besl P., and McKay N.A. Method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 14 2 (1992) 239-256
11. Daniels D. Ground penetrating radar. 2nd ed. (2004), IEE, London
12. Annan A.P. Ground penetrating radar: Principles, procedures & applications (2003), Sensors & Software Inc., Mississauga
13. Binda L., Lenzi G., and Saisi A. NDE of masonry structures: Use of radar tests for the characterization of stone masonries. NDT&E Int 31 (1998) 411-419
14. Arias P., Armesto J., Di-Capua D., González-Drigo R., Lorenzo H., and Pérez-Gracia V. Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge. Eng Failure Anal 4 8 (2007) 1444-1457
15. Armesto J., Lubowiecka I., Ordóñez C., and Rial F. FEM modeling of structures based on close range digital photogrammetry. Automation in Construction 18 (2009) 559-569
16. Petryna Y.S., and Kraetzig W.B. Compliance-based structural damage measure and its sensitivity to uncertainties. Comput & Structures 83 (2005) 1113-1133
17. Cavicchi A., and Gambarotta L. Collapse analysis of masonry bridges taking into account arch-fill interaction. Eng Struct 27 (2005) 605-615
18. Rafiee A., Vinches M., and Bohatier C. Application of the NSCD method to analyse the dynamic behaviour of stone arched structures. Internat J Solids Structures 45 (2008) 6269-6283
19. In: Bull J.W. (Ed). Computational modelling of masonry (2001), Brickwork and Blockwork Structures Saxe-Coburg Publications
20. Szymczak C. Elements of design theory (1998), PWN, Warsaw [in Polish]
21. Romera L.E., Hernandez S., and Reinosa J.M. Numerical characterization of the structural behaviour of the Basilica of Pilar in Zaragoza (Spain). Part 1: Global and local models. Adv Eng Softw 39 (2008) 301-314
22. Fanning P.J., and Boothby T.E. Three-dimensional modeling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Comput & Structures 79 (2001) 2645-2662
23. Berto L., Saetta A., Scotta R., and Vitaliani R. Shear behaviour of masonry panel: Parametric FE analyses. Internat J Solids Structures 41 (2004) 4383-4405
24. Juhasova E., Sofronie R., and Bairrao R. Stone masonry in historical buildings-Ways to increase their resistance and durability. Eng Struct 30 (2008) 2194-2205
25. Bathe K.J. Finite element procedures (1996), Prentice Hall, New Jersay
26. Colla C, Brencich A. The influence of construction technology on the mechanics of masonry railway bridges. In: Proceedings of railway engineering conference. 2002
27. Gentile C., and Saisi A. Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identification and damage assessment. Constr Build Mater 21 (2007) 1311-1321
28. Chen J.L., and Ho J.S. A comparative study of design sensitivity analysis by using commercial finite element programs. Finite Elem Anal Des 15 (1994) 189-200
29. Iwicki P. Stability of truss with linear elastic side-supports. Thin-Walled Struct 45 (2007) 849-854
30. RAMAC GPR user manual, Mala Geoscience. www.malags.se